Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4181-4200 of 5120 results.
Mohammad Salim Ahmed @ Md. Salim Miah Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 214 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1784 of 2003 Judgm....... 5. We have considered the submissions made by the learned Advocate-oh-record and perused the materials. P.W.1 the informant was accompanied by other employees of the company at the time of occurrence and as such they are most natural witnesses of the occurrence. We are, therefore, of th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Jahangir Alam (Selim) Vs. Md. Hebjul Bari and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on Record-For Respondent No.1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-4 Civil Appeal No. 231 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 13th April, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No. 536 of 2003) J......without any order as to cost. The impugned judgment and order dated 13-04-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 536 of 2003 are hereby set aside and the rule so issued is hereby recalled. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Chief Engin, Dredger Direct, BD Water Dev. Board. Vs. Chairman, 2nd Lbour Court, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... nos. 2 & 3 (In Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1998) Ex-parte-Respondent No. 1(In Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1998) Civil Appeal No. 99-100 of 1998 (From the Judgment and Order dated 27-10-1997 passed by the High Court Division in writ petition No. 2126 of 1994 and judgm......ed to be taken away without issuing a show cause. 17. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed without any orders to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-4. Not Represented-For Respondent Nos. 5-8. Civil Appeal No. 235 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated 6.1.1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992). Judgm......ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r the Appellant Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Civil Appeal No. 234 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated August 17, 2002 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2000) Judg......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... instructed by A.K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1(a) Not represented.....Respondent Nos. 2-4 Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 8,1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2419 of 1990) ......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Sarker(in person)-For the Appellant Not represented-Respondents Civil Appeal No. 131 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 31.07.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 664 of 1994) Judgme......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-5 (in all the cases) Civil Appeal Nos. 56-86 of 2005 (From the Judgment and order dated 12,04.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 4919, 4920, 4921, 4922, 49......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- In Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 189 of 2003 informant Mainul Islam seeks leave to appeal against the Judgment and order dated 26.11.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 o......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 45 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 18.01.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 625 of 1999) Jud......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Represented-Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave-to Appeal No. 195 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 28.10.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 12022 of 2003......tted error failing to consider that entire case is false and was initiated at the instance of one Joynal Hazari, an enemy of the petitioner and that there was no eye of witness to the alleged occurrence and as such the judgment of the High Court Division has been passed illegally. There bei..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No. 130 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 7th May. 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 1156 of 200) ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cted by A. K. M. Shahidul Hug, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 179 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 26.4 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1127 of 1998) Judge......ge for a jack fruit and .at one stage it turned into a severe altercation between them and on hearing the hue and cry, the other accused persons including the petitioners came to the place of occurrence with arms in their hands and encircled his father Durud Miah and Tunu Miah and started a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....orney General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondents (In Crl. A. No. 15-16/2001) Criminal Appeal No. 14-16 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 9th December, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 22 of 1994) ......s seriously prejudiced the defendant. In elaborating the above submission, the learned Counsel pointed out that prosecution could not prove its case in respect of the time, place and manner of occurrence, rather, it was disproved by prosecution evidence itself in as much as a written F.I.R ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lants M.A. Rouf, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2002 (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th November, 2000 passed by the High Court Division, in Criminal Appeal No.772 of 1993) ...... of which P.W. 1 informant, who did not suspect any body in the FIR, P.W-3 deposed in the Court that she saw the accused fleeing away by crossing the boundary wall of the deceased Rubel after occurrence but did not state the same before the Investigation Officer, P.W.4 suspected the a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....olved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Respondent-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 142 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 22nd January, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 557 of 1997) ......n the bag is very much available in Bogra town and every shops of Bogra town sell such black alachi which the prosecution branded as black Indian alachi and further the alleged place of occurrence was far away from the Indian border and as such it was not possible to bring illegal goo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and othÂers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 210 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order dated 11.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1656 of 2000) Judg......titioners merit consideration. 7. Leave is granted to consider the additional grounds furnished on behalf of the petitioners, which are as follows. I. Because the place of occurrence has been shifted and in this respect witnesses have contradicted themselves particu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Appellants Shahadat Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 2000 (From the Judgment and Order dated 18.7.1995 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 3225 of 1991). Judg......ossain chased the culprits from behind with a torch of three batteries and recognized the accused respondents running towards the east and that thereafter P. Ws, 6, 7, 8 and 11 came to the place of occurrence and Romeza was at first taken to the local hospital and then to the hospital at Khulna...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e with him) instructed by Md. Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-3 Civil Appeal No. 193 of 2002 (From the Judgment and Order dated 17.05.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2992 of 1996) Judgme...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pellant. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents (1a-1j). Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-11. Civil Appeal No. 269 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 01.04.1996 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 473 of 1981) Judgme......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
20672066206520642063206220612060205920582057205620552054205320522051205020492048