Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 5541-5560 of 5957 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and Others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....49 of 1992) Judgment October 28, 1993. Cases Referred to- Narendra Chadda Vs. Union of India, AIR 1986 (SC) 638; Asoke Gulati Vs. BS Jain, AIR 1987 (SC) 424 ; PD Agarwal and another Vs. State of UP and others, AIR 1987 (SC) 1676; KC Arora Vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1987 (SC) 1858; TR Ka......ts (In Civil Appeal No. 63 of 1992) SM Abdul Bari and another .... .........Appellants (In Civil Appeal No. 76 of 1992) Md. Shahidul Alam ……….Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 77 of 1992) Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and Others……Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 44 & 76 of 1992) Md......e 4(1) (Kha) and 5(2) of the impugned Rules of 1990 cannot be declared to be void as those are not violative of the fundamental rights. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 19. ...... 76 of 1992) Md. Shahidul Alam ……….Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 77 of 1992) Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and Others……Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 44 & 76 of 1992) Md. Mofizul Islam and others ………..Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 45 & 76 of 1992) Md. Qutubuddin..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Momtazuddin and another Vs. Yakub Ali, 1993, 22 CLC (AD)
....he view taken in that case, we wish to lay stress that it is a rule sanctioned by expediency and established by practice that a separate application is necessary to be filed for condonation of delay. Statements made in the memo of appeal or in the main petition setting out facts for condonation of d......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Momtazuddin and another………….Defendant-Appellants Vs. Yakub Ali .......................Plaintiff-Respondent Judgment May 27, 1993 Resul......f limitation will remain open for decision at the hearing of the appeal and the respondent is free to take all legitimate objections. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 13. ......d Vs. Shamsuddin, 40 DLR 10; Krishnasami Vs. Ramasami 41 Madras 412 (PC) & Sunderabai Vs. Collector 43 Bom 376 (PC). Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Wahed Ali Dewan Vs. State and another, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....0. ......1994) 10. ......nue to remain in the Jimma of her cider sister as affirmed by the High Court Division. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 10. ......nue to remain in the Jimma of her cider sister as affirmed by the High Court Division. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 10. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Bangladesh Bank and others Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....r Vs. Pakistan PLD (1962) SC 142; Dr Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh 33 DLR (AD) 201; PL Dhingra Vs. Union of India AIR 1958 (SC) 36 & BSI Corporation Vs. Mahbub Hussain 29 DLR (SC) 41; West Bengal State Electricity Board and others Vs. Desh Bandhu Ghose, AIR 1985 (SC) 722; 0 P Bhandari Vs. India......hmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh Bank and others ....... Appellants Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan............ Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1992)......unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ......rred to- Abdul Hannan Sikder and Ershad Ali Vs. Bangladesh Bank 31 DLR (AD) 298; Abdul Majid Vs. Mushafee Ahmed 17 DLR (SC) 63; Gholam. Sarwar Vs. Pakistan PLD (1962) SC 142; Dr Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh 33 DLR (AD) 201; PL Dhingra Vs. Union of India AIR 1958 (SC) 36 & BSI Corp..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Sharif Nurul Ambia Vs. Dhaka City Corporation represented by its Mayor and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he Master Plan of Greater Dhaka City cannot be allowed in spite of all that they have done so far…………..(23, 25-28). Cases Referred to- V Lakshmipathy vs. State of Karnataka reported in AIR 1992 Karnataka 57; RV Paddingtom Valuation Officer Ex P Peachey ......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 293
Sheikh Farid (Md) & others Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dence is contradictory and he has no regard for truth, that PW 5 has stated that bainapatra was written on a plain paper but, in fact, the same was written on cartridge paper bearing the water mark State of Calcutta and the national symbol of India (bengali) and as such it can be safely concluded......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sheikh Farid (Md) & others. ............. Appellants Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others...................Respondents Judgment M......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Selim (Md) and others Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Selim (Md) and others........................Petitioners Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others....................Respondents Judgment February 8, 2002 The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1951 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 96 The Limitation Act, 190......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J Selim (Md) and others........................Petitioners Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others....................Respondents Judgment ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Serajul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment April 15, 2002. The State Acquisition and tenancy Act, 1951 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 143 The Limitation Act, 1...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Anwar Hossain Vs. Mainul Hosein & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ic exercise. All the appeals are allowed……………………(28) Cases Referred to- Kudrat e-Elahi Panir vs. Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 319; State of Bihar vs. Rai Bahadur Hurdut Roy Moti Lal Jute Mills and another AIR 1960 SC 378; Madhu L......vil) Present : Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Anwar Hossain………………….Appellant Vs. Mainul Hosein & others... ......Respondents Judgment May 2, 2005. ...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ...... appeals. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Rana Awan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... to the Solicitor. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n case, the right of pre-emption would not be lost…………………….(14) The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (IV of 1882), section 52 The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), section 96 If re-conveyance is ma......resent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Harendra Nath Mahali…………………………… Appellant Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others...............Respondents Judgment Ma...... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......gly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ip;…………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others... .........................Respondents Judgment March 14, 2006. The State Acquisition and tenancy Act, 1951 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 96 If by reconveyance, ......sent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Afia Begum and others…………………………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others... .........................Respondents Judgment....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Nur Amin and others..............Appellants Vs. Abdul Quddus and others... .............Respondents Judgment March 23......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ...... appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Monowara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS)...........................Petitioner Vs. Monowara Begum and others.......................................Respondents Jud......ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......s of law. The case is set back for trial rightly in accordance with law……………………(10, 11 & 12) Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitione..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Jainul Abedin Jamal Vs. Qais Huda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jainul Abedin Jamal....................Petitioner Vs. Qais Huda and others....................Respondents Judgment December 15......e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......h the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others.................Appellants Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others..................Respondents Judgment November 22, 2005. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1951 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 96(2) Objection as to def......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others.................Appellants Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others..................Respondents Judgment Nove......im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Benodini Dasi 28 DLR (AD) 5; 14 DLR 847. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, (Probir Neogi, Advocate with him) instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others..................Appellants Vs. State............................Respondent Judgment December 7, 2004. The...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others..................Appellants Vs. State............................Respondent Judgment December 7, 2004......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......st sincerely submitted and undertook that in future they will be most careful not to repeat such incident as would amount to contempt of Court. 8. At the hearing of the Rules Mr. Mahmudul Islam, a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh was asked to appear as amicus curiae in..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Agrani Bank. Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank........................Appellant Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors................Respondents Judgment April 17, ...... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......side. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on Commission represented by the Chairman (Chief Election Commissioner) and anr.......Respondents Judgment April 17, 2006. Contempt of Court Statement of para 3 of the impugned Petition filed on 5-02-2006 in the impugned case is likely to c...... Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka.........................Petitioner Vs. Election Commission represented by the Chairman (Chief Election Commissioner) and......Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dha..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha......................Appellant Vs. Abdul Jakir and others........................Respondents Judgment......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......if vs. Province of West Pakistan, PLD 1970 SC 180; Al-Haj Abul Basher being dead his heirs Hosne Ara Begum vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
11241122112111191117111611141113111011051104110211011100109810931092109110901089