Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
FM Rashiduzzaman Vs. Bahauddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ent May 3, 1976. Cases referred to: H. H. B. Gill Vs. The King, A.I.R. 1948 (P. C.) 128; Matajagdobey Vs. H. C. Bhari, P.L.D. 1957 (S.C.) (India) 160; Syed Ahmad Vs. The State, 1958, 10 D. L. R. (S. C.) 12 PLD 1958 (S.C.) 27; Baijnath Vs. State of M.P. in A.I.R. 1966, ......B. Mahmud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. FM Rashiduzzaman……….Appellant Vs. Bahauddin Ahmed and another…….Respondents Judgment May 3, 1976. ......ible for the loss of the promising life cannot be prosecuted as the said officer Bahauddin acted in the discharge of his official duty. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ible for the loss of the promising life cannot be prosecuted as the said officer Bahauddin acted in the discharge of his official duty. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
...., C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment ......ud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment &n......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J M.A. Zaher………...Appellant And Haji Jalal Ahmed …….... Appellant And Md. Khurshed Alam Khan………….Appellant Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another……..Respondent Judgment April 27, 1976. Result: ......g the appellant Khurshed Alam Khan for abetment of the offence of contempt of court and sentencing him therefor. In the result this appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......g before a Division Bench, a Rule, suo motu was issued by it against Captain M. M. Haque, Chairman, Naranyanganj Municipality, Md. Khurshed Alam Khan, Secretary, Naranyanganj Municipality and Nurul Islam Sikdar, Head Assistant Basic Democracy Section, Divisional Commissioner's Office, Dacca direct..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... A. B. Mahmud Hussain, C.J. Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases Referred to: ......sent: Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, C.J. Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases ......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....……....Respondents Judgment January 29, 1976. Cases Referred to: Jagadish Bhargava Vs. Jawaharlal Bhargava and others A.I.R. 1961(S.C.) 832; Secretary of State for India Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others ...... Mahmud Husain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Dacca Improvement Trust…………….Appellant. Vs. Waliullah and others……………....Respondents Judg...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca......Appellant. Vs. M/s. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd....... Respondent. Judgment November 19, 1975. Result: ......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141.......that this appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court are set aside and that of the Appellate Tribunal restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 141...Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....al) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April 6, 1976. ......n (Criminal) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....is not present in Bangladesh or whose whereabouts are not known or who has ceased to occupy, supervise or manage in his property including: (i) any property owned by any person who is a citizen of State which at any time after the 25th day of March, 1971, was at war with or engaged in military op......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hussain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Government of Bangladesh......Appellant. Vs. Messrs A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976......sturb the decision of the High Court Division. Subject to the observation made above, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ...... Industries Ltd. and others…….Respondents Judgement March 15, 1976. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Appellant. Shah Abu Mayeen, Advocate instructed by Ab..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of BanglaÂdesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......d Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd…………....Appellant. Vs. The Govt. of Bangladesh and others…………….....Resp......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Addl. Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Asstt. Attorney-General, instructed by S.S. Hoda, Advocate-on-Record—For the Responden..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... appeal arises in the following circumstances. Appellant Haji Md. Shariatullah filed, in the 3rd Court of the Subordinate Judge, Dacca, an application under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for pre-emption of ce......p; Present: AM Sayem CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Haji Md. Shariatullah......Appellant Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others. ...Respondents Judgment July 3, 1975......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Khondkar Mohiuddin Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment August 13, 1976. Cases referred to: Mt. Durga Choudhurani Vs. Jawahri Singh Choudhurani, L.R. 17 I.A. 122, = I.L.R. 18 Cal. 23; Venkata Kumara Mahipati Suryarao Vs. Secretary of State, L.R, 56 LA. 223 = 33 C.W.N. 725=A.I.R. 1929 Cal. 152; Ramji Patal Vs. Rao Kishore Singh, L.R.......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Khondkar Mohiuddin…………...Appellant. Vs. Syed Moin Ahmed…………....Respondent Judgment August 13, 1976. Cases referr......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ......dgment and decree of the High Court are set aside and the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 85. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......ion (Civil) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Azizur Rahman and another………….Appellants Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others………..Respondents Judgment August 26, 197......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Appellants Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others………..Respondents Judgment August 26, 1975. Result: The Appeal fails. Cases Referred to- Hajee Nurul Islam Chowdhury and others Vs. The Patya Tea Company Limited (1968) 20 DLR (Dac.) 54, PLD 1969 Dacca..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another………. Respondents Judgment ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......evanand Gir, I.L.R. 52 All. 619 same case A.I.R. 1930, All. 225; C.V. Raghavayya Vs. Chamria Talkie Distributors and another, A.I.R. 1958 Andhra Pradesh 31. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallick, Advocate-on- Record—For the ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....nim J Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others...............Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1974). Sk. Sarwaruddin……..... Appellant (In Criminal ApÂpeal No. 29 of 1974). Vs. The State ………………...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: The appeals a...... Fazle Munim J Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others...............Appellants (In Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1974). Sk. Sarwaruddin……..... Appellant (In Criminal ApÂpeal No. 29 of 1974). Vs. The State ………………...Respondent Judgment February 10, 1976. Result: T......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for exÂpeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers I...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Government of BangÂladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ct, and therefore no quesÂtion of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Government of BangÂladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases ref......ct, and therefore no quesÂtion of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......or General of India in Council Vs. Bilas Singh, and Nalini Ranjan Guha Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1954 Cal. 462. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellan..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan CineÂma Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....Ramnath Ram Prasad Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax U. P. 1964 (54) I.T.R. 777; Jamnadas Prabhudas, Bombay Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax Bombay City, 1952 (22) I.T.R. 150; Chandi Prasad Chokhani Vs. State of Bihar, 1961 (43) I.T.R. 498; Provincial Library Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax East Pakist...... A. B. Mahmud Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone........Appellant Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co...................Respondents Judgment 17th......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Matilal Sikder & ors Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin B Das & ors, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....s appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Single Judge of Dacca High Court setting aside a concurrent order allowing pre-emption by the two courts below under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act and dismissing the application for pre-emption filed by the appe...... A. B. Mahmud Hussain J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Matilal Sikder & ors……... Appellants Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin Behari Das and others.........Respondents ......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....where the tenure or holdÂing is sold in execution of a certificate, for arrears of rent due in respect thereof, the tenure or holding, shall, subject to the proviÂsions of section 90 of East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950, where that section is in force, pass to the purchaser with t......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Hussain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Golam Hafez Mia……………………………… Appellant. Vs. Khadem Ali Meah .........................Respondent Judgment November 17, 1977. Resu......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82