Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......vision in Civil Revision No. 356 of 1990). Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendants' appeal by leave against the judgment dated July 31, 2000 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 356..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Monowara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......by Mvi Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 564 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 9-2-2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5151 of 2..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Jainul Abedin Jamal Vs. Qais Huda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......tition No. 1675 of 1999). Not represented- Respondent No. 1 (In Civil Petition No. 1674 of 2004). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1674-75 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 17-8-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 3420 and ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdur Rahim (Md) Vs. Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itioner. 14. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. In view of the above, the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed.......fa Niaz Mohammad, Advocate, instructed by Md. Feroz Shah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 2 (In both the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 113 and 114 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 20-7-2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 198 and ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cate with him) instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-22. Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 19-11-1999 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 559 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ants (In Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2004). Sajjadid Hoq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In both the appeals). Criminal Appeal Nos. 12 and 16 of 2004. (From the judgment dated 28th January 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous suo mo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Agrani Bank. Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......rs Involved: MG Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ansarul Hague (in person)—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 323 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 9th January 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 55..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......r for stay was made therein. 4. MA Jalil MP filed Writ Petition No.9180 of 2005 with similar prayers. Both the petitions being heard by the High Court Division have been disposed of by the judgment and order dated 4-1 -2006 giving some findings and observations. 5. Being aggrieve..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......d by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent No. 2. Civil Appeal No. 121 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 26-8-2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3100 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Agrani Bank and other Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nts to granting of entire relief sought in the proceeding the ad interim relief so granted is not legally well founded and granting of such ad interim relief has been deprecated by the Court whose judgment is binding on all Courts. 17. In the case of Bank of Maharashtra vs. Race Shipping..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Abdul Mannan Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... to questions of law and he is bound to accept the lower Appellate Court’s finding of fact if the same is based on proper evidence……….(11) There is nothing in the judgment of the High Court Division to indicate that the findings arrived at by the lower Appellate..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Fatema Khatun and others Vs. Abdul Quddus, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 721. ...... Civil Revision No. 1722 of 1993). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appeal is by the heirs of the pre-emptee against the judgment dated June 28, 2000 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1722 of 1993 making ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......dent No. 1. Civil Appeal 129 of 1998. Judgment: MM Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is from the judgment and order dated 1st September, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Vs. Ekushey Television Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....f upto 100% of the overall share holding of the telecommunications operating company. The Government also undertook to make all endeavours to remove all procedural and other impediments for quick implementation of the projects including investment proposals from foreign investors in the countr......epresented—Respondent No. 2 (Civil Appeal Nos. 387 of 2003). Not represented—Respondent Nos. 1-9 (Civil Appeal No. 384 of 2003). Civil Appeal Nos. 383-384 with 385-387 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 28th August 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 41..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 266
Yaor Mia (Md) and another Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Ex parte— The Respondent Nos. 1-2. Dispensed with— Respondent Nos. 3-12. Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 6th May 1992 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1585 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Yogeshwar Gope Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 982; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 226. ......ek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 41 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 12-1-2003 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 46 of 20..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Abdul Kader Vs. Secretary, Election Commission and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....f their duties." 8. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed Ed. ......ab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 4. Not represented—For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1099 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25th July 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 480 ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sec., Min. of Food, Government of BD & ors Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......r Advocate, instructed by NI Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Dispensed with—Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Civil Appeal No. 70 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 7-12-1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2170 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abu Dakar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......l, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not represented—The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 386 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 9th February, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
State Vs. Abdur Rahim, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e of issuance of Rule in an application under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and hence the same requires interference. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. Ed. ......ucted by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1999. (From the judgment and orders dated 9-12-1997 and 21-5-1998 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Mis..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57