Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 181-200 of 614 results.
Adhir Das Vs. Arati Rani Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....hs from the date of receipt of the lower Court record. There is no order as to costs. Send down the lower Court record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 53. ......hs from the date of receipt of the lower Court record. There is no order as to costs. Send down the lower Court record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 53. ......ndant-petitioner under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) against the judgment and decree dated 18.9.1997 passed by the learned Judge of the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat (hereinafter referred to as the Adalat) in Family Appeal No.7 of 1997 affirming the judgment ......nal Jurisdiction) Present: Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J Adhir Das………………………………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Arati Rani Das and others……………………………………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Khalil Ullah and others Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....t High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Naima Haider J Md. Khalil Ullah and others………………………….Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and others………………………..Respondents Judgment ......igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Naima Haider J Md. Khalil Ullah and others………………………….Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and others………………………..Respondents Judgment Janua......Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Naima Haider J Md. Khalil Ullah and others………………………….Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and others………………………..Respondents Judgment January 2......ase is also Reported in: 18 BLT (HCD) (2010) 69. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 37
....ismissed the suit by judgment and decree dated 28.6.1989, against which the plaintiffs preferred Title Appeal No.257 of 1989 in the Court of District Judge, Jessore. Ultimately the Subordinate Judge (Artha Rin), Jessore heard the appeal and dismissed the same by judgment and decree dated 14.10.1993.......ed the suit by judgment and decree dated 28.6.1989, against which the plaintiffs preferred Title Appeal No.257 of 1989 in the Court of District Judge, Jessore. Ultimately the Subordinate Judge (Artha Rin), Jessore heard the appeal and dismissed the same by judgment and decree dated 14.10.1993. Being......above observations, however, without any order as to cost. The order of status quo granted earlier is vacated.
Send down the lower Courts’ records.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......ed in:
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Mir Niaz Mohammad Vs. Additional District Judge and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....iving rise to a disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division (II) the law is now well settled that since there being special provision for appeal in the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 no application under Article 102 of the Constitution lies against the Jud......rise to a disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division (II) the law is now well settled that since there being special provision for appeal in the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 no application under Article 102 of the Constitution lies against the Judgment ...... to a disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division (II) the law is now well settled that since there being special provision for appeal in the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 no application under Article 102 of the Constitution lies against the Judgment and ...... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Sheikh Abdul Awal J Mir Niaz Mohammad……………………Petitioner Vs. Additional District Judge and others…………………….Respondents Judgment August 9, 2007. Result: The Rul..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 114
.....224 (F.M.) of 2004.
Judgment
Sheikh Abdul Awal J.- This first miscellaneous appeal is directed against the Order No.102 dated 7.7.2003 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court and Artha Rin Adalat, Feni in Execution Case No.3 of 1995 rejecting the application of the appellant und......F.M.) of 2004.
Judgment
Sheikh Abdul Awal J.- This first miscellaneous appeal is directed against the Order No.102 dated 7.7.2003 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court and Artha Rin Adalat, Feni in Execution Case No.3 of 1995 rejecting the application of the appellant under Ord......) of 2004.
Judgment
Sheikh Abdul Awal J.- This first miscellaneous appeal is directed against the Order No.102 dated 7.7.2003 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court and Artha Rin Adalat, Feni in Execution Case No.3 of 1995 rejecting the application of the appellant under Order X......Appellate Jurisdiction)
Present:
Sheikh Abdul Awal J
M. Moazzam Husain J
Awlad Hossain………………………Appellant
Vs.
Bangladesh Shilpa Bank (BSB), Maijdi Branch, Noakhali and others………………………Respondents
Judgment
April 29, 2010.
Result:
The ap..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 145
Sonali Bank Limited Vs. Syed Shakhawat Hossain and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....h is still pending. Besides, in order to realize the outstanding loan of Taka 8,21,19,720 (eight crores twenty one lakh nineteen thousand and seven hundred twenty), the Bank had filed, in the first Artha Rin Court, Dhaka, Artha Rin Suit No.310/2003 in which the Artha Rin Court passed Judgment and ......till pending. Besides, in order to realize the outstanding loan of Taka 8,21,19,720 (eight crores twenty one lakh nineteen thousand and seven hundred twenty), the Bank had filed, in the first Artha Rin Court, Dhaka, Artha Rin Suit No.310/2003 in which the Artha Rin Court passed Judgment and decree......ase No.574 of 2005, the learned Court had put the mortgaged property in auction twice, but it could not be sold. Hence, the decree-holder Bank filed an application under section 33 (5) of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 for issuance of a certificate as per provisions of section 33(5) of the said Ain, T......gh Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: MA Hye J Md. Rezaul Hasan J Sonali Bank Limited……………………Defendant-Appellants Vs. Syed Shakhawat Hossain and others…………………………………Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment August 21, 201..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 212
AKM Tofazzel Hossain and others Vs. Rupali Bank Limited and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
..... Writ Petition No.5376 of 2007. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi, the petitioners challenged the legality of the order No.12 dated 27-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Jari Case No.74 of 2003 imposing 6 months Civil detention of t......; Writ Petition No.5376 of 2007. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi, the petitioners challenged the legality of the order No.12 dated 27-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Jari Case No.74 of 2003 imposing 6 months Civil detention of the pet...... Writ Petition No.5376 of 2007. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi, the petitioners challenged the legality of the order No.12 dated 27-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Jari Case No.74 of 2003 imposing 6 months Civil detention of the petit...... This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 435. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Setara Begum Vs. Al-Arafah Islami Bank Ltd. and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 24-8-2006 (Annexure-E to the writ petition) passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006, conferring title of petitioner'...... the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 24-8-2006 (Annexure-E to the writ petition) passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006, conferring title of petitioner's mort...... Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 24-8-2006 (Annexure-E to the writ petition) passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006, conferring title of petitioner's mortgage......me Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J SM Ziaul Karim J Setara Begum.......................Petitioner Vs. Al-Arafah Islami Bank Ltd. and others ………………….Respondents Judgment November 20, 2008. Result: The Rul..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Nawabgonj Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....91(3) dated 2-10-1989, passed by the respondent No.4 and subsequently making it rule/ decree of the Court and the proceedings of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998, now pending in the First Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Nawabganj (Annexure-H), should not be declared to have been made without any lawfu......dated 2-10-1989, passed by the respondent No.4 and subsequently making it rule/ decree of the Court and the proceedings of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998, now pending in the First Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Nawabganj (Annexure-H), should not be declared to have been made without any lawful auth......d 2-10-1989, passed by the respondent No.4 and subsequently making it rule/ decree of the Court and the proceedings of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998, now pending in the First Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Nawabganj (Annexure-H), should not be declared to have been made without any lawful authorit......iginal Jurisdiction) Present: ABM Khairul Haque J SM Ziaul Karim J Nawabgonj Central Co-operative Bank Ltd.……………………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……………………………Respondents Judgment April 29, 2007. Result: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Sultana Jute Mills Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....ers and it has been also circulated to all banks behind the back and knowledge of the petitioners. The respondent No.3 bank instituted Mortgage Suit No.21 of1990 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin AdalatNo.1,Chittagong, claiming an amount of Tk. 8,89,94,800.22/-against the petitioners a......d it has been also circulated to all banks behind the back and knowledge of the petitioners. The respondent No.3 bank instituted Mortgage Suit No.21 of1990 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin AdalatNo.1,Chittagong, claiming an amount of Tk. 8,89,94,800.22/-against the petitioners and oth...... has been also circulated to all banks behind the back and knowledge of the petitioners. The respondent No.3 bank instituted Mortgage Suit No.21 of1990 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin AdalatNo.1,Chittagong, claiming an amount of Tk. 8,89,94,800.22/-against the petitioners and others....... is also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 434. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Md. Sazzad Hossain Vs. M/S. Kaderia Publication and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.271 vacating the order dated 04.02.2002 by allowing t......section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.271 vacating the order dated 04.02.2002 by allowing the pla......ion 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.271 vacating the order dated 04.02.2002 by allowing the plainti......nt: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Syed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J Md. Sazzad Hossain…………………………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. M/S. Kaderia Publication and another……………………………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 21, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Osarunnessa Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....l Islam J.- At the instance of the petitioner Osarunnessa, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.17 dated 25-01-2011 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annex......m J.- At the instance of the petitioner Osarunnessa, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.17 dated 25-01-2011 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annexure-B)......- At the instance of the petitioner Osarunnessa, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.17 dated 25-01-2011 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annexure-B) in ......ourt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ashfaqul Islam J Mustafa Zaman Islam J Osarunnessa………………………..Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others………………………Respondents Judgment March 12, 2012. Result: The Ru..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Dr. M. Rafiquzzaman Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....3,01,85,650/=. The respondent bank proceeded under Section 33 of the Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Order 1972 (President's Order No.129 of 1972) and filed Misc. Case before the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat on 1.8.1992. The learned Joint District Judge Artha Rin Adalat registered it as Mis......desh Shilpa Bank and others, 42 DLR (AD) 221, 18 BLD (AD) 124, 18 BLD (AD) 136; Jahanara Akhter Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 47 DLR (HCD) 158; Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sanstha Vs. Azir Uddin, 51 DLR (AD) 1996. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Mannan with Subrata Chowd......0/=. The respondent bank proceeded under Section 33 of the Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Order 1972 (President's Order No.129 of 1972) and filed Misc. Case before the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat on 1.8.1992. The learned Joint District Judge Artha Rin Adalat registered it as Misc. Case No......t: The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Vs. Jahanara Akhter, 49 DLR (AD) 1980; New Ideal Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Bank and others, 42 DLR (AD) 221, 18 BLD (AD) 124, 18 BLD (AD) 136; Jahanara Akhter Begum and others Vs. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Rashida Mahabub Vs. IFIC Bank & others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No.711 of 2004. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi the petitioner challenged the legality of the orders dated 12-8-2003 and 8-2-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.123 of 2002. 2. Material facts relevant f......ndent No.1. Writ Petition No.711 of 2004. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi the petitioner challenged the legality of the orders dated 12-8-2003 and 8-2-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.123 of 2002. 2. Material facts relevant for dis......t No.1. Writ Petition No.711 of 2004. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi the petitioner challenged the legality of the orders dated 12-8-2003 and 8-2-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.123 of 2002. 2. Material facts relevant for disposa......Bank & others……………………………Respondents Judgment September 16, 2007. Result: The Rule is made absolute in part. Cases Referred to- Abbasuddin Chowdhury Vs. Chandra Mohan Chowdhury, 18 DLR 535; Sahara Khatun Vs. Abdul Gafur @ Abdul Gaffer, 55 DLR (AD) 79; Abd..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 136
M. A. Jaher and others Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....o.1-2. Writ Petition No.6067 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J.- This rule has arisen out of order No.49 dated 16.6.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the writ petitioners passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Bhola in Artha Rin Execution Case No.6 of 2001. 2. The facts relevant for ...... Writ Petition No.6067 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J.- This rule has arisen out of order No.49 dated 16.6.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the writ petitioners passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Bhola in Artha Rin Execution Case No.6 of 2001. 2. The facts relevant for dispos...... Writ Petition No.6067 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J.- This rule has arisen out of order No.49 dated 16.6.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the writ petitioners passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Bhola in Artha Rin Execution Case No.6 of 2001. 2. The facts relevant for disposal o......This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 283. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
....f People's Republic of Bangladesh a rule was issued in the following terms:
Let a rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.15 dated 12-5-2009 passed in Artha Execution Case No.145 of 2007 by the Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka so far as it relates to issu......ed in the following terms:
Let a rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.15 dated 12-5-2009 passed in Artha Execution Case No.145 of 2007 by the Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka so far as it relates to issuing warrant of arrest against the petitioners sha......n the following terms:
Let a rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.15 dated 12-5-2009 passed in Artha Execution Case No.145 of 2007 by the Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka so far as it relates to issuing warrant of arrest against the petitioners shall n......BLD (HCD) (2010) 359.
..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ragib Hasan Khan @ Munu Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ly hanged the sign board "Munu Shoe Museum" instead of "New shoe Museum" with a view to misappropriate the loan money; that for realization of money, the complainant bank filed a suit in the court of Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna being Money Suit No.92 of 1997 against the accused No.1 and accused No.2 and......ged the sign board "Munu Shoe Museum" instead of "New shoe Museum" with a view to misappropriate the loan money; that for realization of money, the complainant bank filed a suit in the court of Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna being Money Suit No.92 of 1997 against the accused No.1 and accused No.2 and that ......the sign board "Munu Shoe Museum" instead of "New shoe Museum" with a view to misappropriate the loan money; that for realization of money, the complainant bank filed a suit in the court of Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna being Money Suit No.92 of 1997 against the accused No.1 and accused No.2 and that the ...... (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Md. Ataur Rahman Khan J Md. Ragib Hasan Khan @ Munu………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State and another………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 6, 2009. Res..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Contech Ltd. and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....is directed to dispose of the suit within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order in the interest of all the parties. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 133. ......arketing Company Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the SMC') vide their letter dated 14.12.1998, would be made directly by the Siemens to the bank, the appellant. The defence taken by the respondent in Artho Rin Case is more or less is the case as made out by the respondent in Title Suit No.227 of 2004. The......e mortgaged property of the defendant-respondents till the disposal of the suit. 2. The relevant facts in short are that the defendant-appellant (hereinafter called 'the appellant') filed Arthorin Adalat Case No.33 of 2002 against the respondents for realising an amount of Tk.39 lac and odd. The ......ion (Civil Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Sheikh Abdul J Pubali Bank Ltd……………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Contech Ltd. and others………………………………………..Respondents Judgment July 9, 2005. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Habib Khan Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ore Hafazat Nirapad Abssan are directed to set at liberty the victim Mosammat Rokeya Dil Afroz Munmun forthwith. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 462, 18 MLR (HCD) (2013) 19. ......ore Hafazat Nirapad Abssan are directed to set at liberty the victim Mosammat Rokeya Dil Afroz Munmun forthwith. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 462, 18 MLR (HCD) (2013) 19. ......rected to opposite parties to set the victim at liberty. 2. The prosecution story in short is that Md. Abul Hossain filed a complaint case before the learned Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Special Adalat No.1, Dhaka, the case was registered as Nari-o-Shishu Petition Case No.134 of 2010 and therea...... Result: The Rule is made absolute. When the state does not raise any objection in such circumstances the High Court Division can certainly interfere, when the liberty of a citizen is curtailed and his valuable right of freedom is taken away by the order of the subordinate Court and the High C..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 176
Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ial Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. ......iginal Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. Res......al Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. Result:......sdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. Result: The..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 254
84448443840683998398839583948393835683478344830882918283827082498248824782258224