Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Alimuzzarnan (Reza) and others Vs. Md. Masudar Rahman @ Babul and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....gistered through Court and also got formal possession of the suit lands through Court. His further case is that the plaintiff’s deed of agreement for sale dated 27th March, 1984 is ante-dated and collusive one, created for the purpose of grabbing the suit lands. 4. The trial Court on assessme..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Abdul Gani Khan Vs. Shamser Ali and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....e did not enter into contract for sale of the suit land nor executed Bainapatra and never received any earnest money and the ex parte decree obtained by plaintiff against the son of Manada Sundari is collusive and fraudulent and not binding on the defendants and that plaintiff is not in possession o..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Aslam and others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... the said papers were made public and also cogent reasons given by the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court disbelieved the papers filed by the plaintiffs on the ground that these papers were collusive and never saw the light of the day inasmuch as although the plaintiff Aslam filed a title ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman Vs. G.M Mostafa and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... No. 205 Road No. 21, Dhanmondi Residential Area, under Police Station, Dhanmondi, Dhaka from the 'Ka' list of the abandoned buildings published in the official Gazette, on 23rd September 1986 is collusive, fraudulent, void-ab-initio, inoperative and not binding upon the plaintiff. ii. On the..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 118
Zakir Hossain and another Vs. Md. Yousuf Kabir and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....udge, third Court, Dhaka and also for declaration that the kabala executed through Court on 27, 02.1980 in Title Execution Case No.3 of 1980 by the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka was fraudulent, collusive, illegal and void and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The suit land measuring an area of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Nasirul Islam Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....kh Atiar Rahman, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that the writ petitioner was the lawful owner-in-possession of the land in question. The auction notice was published in a collusive manner to deprive him from his lawful property, which infringed his right to property guar..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Umme Hani Begum and others Vs. Ram Gopal Sarker and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
.... plaintiff acquired any title by adverse possession in the suit land and whether that is existing too? (v) Is the registered deed No.5112 executed on 15-4-1969 and registered on 16-4-1969 forged, collusive and not binding upon the plaintiff? (vi) What other reliefs the plaintiff is entitled ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Haji Md. Ishaque and others Vs. Rupali Bank, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....nt No. 1, Rupali Bank and other proforma respondents for declaring the ex‑parte preliminary decree dated 16.1.1986 and final decree dated 2.6.1986 passed in the said suit as illegal, fraudulent and collusive. 3. The case of the plaintiff appellants, inter alia, is that the defendant Nos. 7‑9 ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Quader Chowdhury Vs. Sayedul Hoque & others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
.... 17, 19 and 20 were created in the names of the lessees. The plaintiffs were in possession on the basis of their respective settlement on payment of salami and rents. But the father of the petitioner collusively and fraudulently got 32.50 acres of land out of 78.23 acres recorded in his name without..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Surat Ali (Md) Vs. Administrator of Waqfs and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....se decree made in Title Suit No.45 of 1957 and enrolment of the properties as waqf properties with the Administrator of Waqf bearing EC No.13274 on the basis of the said decree were illegal, void and collusive. The said suit was decreed on contest declaring the compromise decree made in Title Suit N..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 183
Silver Estate Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim Mia and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ough they have no title in the suit property; Title Suit No‑ 771 of 1979 in the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and Title suit No. 417 of 1982 in the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka are collusive proceedings between the defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and inspite of statements made in those ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abul Hashem alias Bachhu Vs. Abdul Latif, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....e 1st Court of Munsif, Noakhali for the restoration of the Title Suit No. 370 of 1982 to its original file and number after setting aside the ex parte decree dated 29.12.1982 as the same was obtained collusively upon suppression of summons and copies of plaint to them; that on 13.03.1983 knowing abo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Lutfun Nessa and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... Amor Chand were not the owners of the suit lands. They never possessed the same and therefore the deeds executed by Adhor Chand and Amor Chand in favour of the appellants predecessor were forged and collusive. 3. The defendant Nos. 3-5 contested the suit by filing a written statement denying all..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Zebunnessa Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax North (Zone), Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ting rent on behalf of “the assessee-appellant but that view is based on no evidence. There is no material to hold that the agreement between the Sonali Estate Agents and the assessee-appellant was collusive one to deprive the Government of the revenue. 15. In the circumstances, we find that th..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Salema Khatun Bibi & others Vs. Hemangini Ghosh Dastidar and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ngini Dastidar, claimed to have purchased the properties Defendant 3 was a tenant in the premises. He instituted a suit being Title suit No. 72/ 60 in the 2nd Court of Munsif, Barisal, and obtained a collusive decree in the names of defendant 1 and 2, showing the plaintiff a party to the suit and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Ayesha Khatun & others Vs. Rabindra Chandra Saha and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....removing the dwelling house of the defendant No. 1 thereon, and for the declaration of the kabala deed No. 2373 dated 5-5-1969 executed by the defendant No. 2 in favour of defendant No. 1 as illegal, collusive, ineffective, created by false personification and not binding upon the plaintiffs and for..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 126
State Vs. Shahidul Islam alias Shahid and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....bit 11). According to the report, calls were made on 23-4-98 and 24-4-98 to the residence phone of Hasan bearing No. 507294. In cross-examination PW 7 has denied that the call report (Exhibit 11) was collusive and forged. 41. PW 8 Anisuzzaman Khan was one of invitees in the PO house at the ongoin..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nurul Islam and others Vs. A Huq Munshi & others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....e disputed order of Kha schedule is legal and fair; that the claim and cause of action of the plaintiffs is false, and that solenama filed by the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 1-3, 8, 9, 11 to 13 was collusive and fraudulent and, as such, the suit is liable to be dismissed. 11. At the trial, the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Suratjan Bewa Vs. Md. Abdul Mannaf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... of 1996 for a declaration that the Hiba-bil-iwaz deed No. 3715 purported to be executed and registered by one late Haji Anfar Uddin on 21-9-1992 in respect of 6.43 acres of land is void, fraudulent, collusive and not binding upon the plaintiff. It was stated, inter alia, that the said suit land ori..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Nasima Akhter Banu Vs. Abu Taher Masud and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....7-1-1985, 537 dated 19-1-1985, 638 dated 24-1-1985, 692 dated 28-1-1985, 2698 dated 23-4-1985 and 3315 dated 1-6-1985 by which the defendant No.1 is said to have purchased the mortgaged land, are all collusive, illegal and void and not binding upon the plaintiff. The said application was allowed by ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99