Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Chand Miah and others Vs. Md. Ibrahim and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....3-01-1938 is collusive, fraudulent, void, forged and without jurisdiction and also for partition of the suit land. 3. The plaintiffs case, in brief, is that Habibulla father of plaintiff was the owner in possession of 19.90 acres of land in C.S. Khatian No.408 in Mouza Zoarshahara; that Habibul...... This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 306. ......tands vacated. 24. Communicated the order at once with a copy of the Judgment for information and taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 306. ..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 8 Aug, 2006 | Hits: 25
Category: Abandoned Properties Law | Date: 24 Jul, 2006 | Hits: 21
Nani Gopal Hazra Vs. Sree Nagendar Nath Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....te parties Nos.3 and 4 respectively and that Fakuram Hazra died without any issue leaving his widow, Mokshoda Bala Dassya; that the appellant and the opposite parties Nos.3 and 4 became the owners of the estate left by Fakuram Hazra according to Hindu Law of Dayabhaga and for that matter t......hellip;………………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Sree Nagendar Nath Roy and others……………………………&h......missing the same is set aside and the Misc. case No.58 of 1972 is allowed. Send down the Lower Court's Record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 540. ..Category: Hindu Law, Property Law | Date: 19 Jul, 2006 | Hits: 15
Nirmalandu Nath Majumder Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ten statement stating that the plaintiff has neither title to nor possession in the suit land and his predecessor in interest neither purchased nor possessed the suit land, that the Government is the owner of the suit land and it has been correctly recorded in the name of Government in the RoR,......dgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 493. ......ass Appeal No.256 of 1984 is hereby affirmed. Send down the lower court records at once along with a copy of the judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 493. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 2 Jul, 2006 | Hits: 3
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 9 May, 2006 | Hits: 6
Ershadul Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....hat he saw the accused and the phensidyle in the office of Sharoda Transport where the police seized the goods and wrote the F.I.R. 12. P.W.5 helper of Sharoda Paribahan deposed that as the owner of the jute bag was not found, he brought the bag from the bus. 13. P.W.6 deposed that a ...... The Appeal is allowed. Where the prosecution has a definite case, it must be proved the whole of it. Partial departure from the prosecution case affects credibility of the witnesses and complete departure makes their testimony to be entirely discarded. Any departure or deviati......ith any other case. Send down the lower courts records along with a copy of the judgment and order to the court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 490. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2006 | Hits: 5
Moju Bibi and others Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ed Title Suit No.2 of 1991 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar Court, Comilla for redemption of mortgaged land. 4. The plaintiffs case in short, was that Lal Mia the original owner mortgaged the suit land to defendants' predecessor Suruj Mia initially for a consideration......This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 639. ...... order as to cost. The judgments and decrees of the courts below are upheld. The lower Courts record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 639. ..Category: Property Law, Procedural Law | Date: 25 Jan, 2006 | Hits: 5
M. Manzur Ahmed Vs. Mrs. Inge Flatz and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... she was living in the then East Pakistan, acquired the suit land by an indenture of lease deed exeÂcuted on 14.09.1965 by the then Dhaka ImÂprovement Trust and thus the defendant No.1 became the owner of the suit land by dint of the lease deed and got possession of the same. Subsequently the d......tion) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Syed AB Mahmudul Huq J M. Manzur Ahmed……………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Mrs. Inge Flatz and others…………………………………….Respondent Judgment December 15, 2005...... liberty to get the sale deed executed and registered through court in accordance with law. Send down the L.C.R. at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 41. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 8
Abdul Aziz & Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hindu Deity Luxmi Gobinda Jew & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd also for performing the Sheba Puja and other religious cereÂmonies. The suit land was recorded as such in her name in the C.S. record of rights as debatter properties. The plaintiff has thus been owner in peaceful possesÂsion of the suit land. During the survey operation under the State Acquisi......angladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner & Deputy Custodian Enemy Property, Dhaka .....................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 217 of 2000) Vs. Hindu Deity Luxmi Gobinda Jew and othÂers .... Respondents (In both the appeals) Judgment December 8, 2005. Result: ......the Civil Appeal No. 216 of 2000 is dismissed with cost of Tk. 500/- and the Civil Appeal No. 217 of 2000 is disÂmissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 90
Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Aug, 2005 | Hits: 4
Golam Hossain Sikder (Md.) and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....pulation that after the expiry of 5 years from the settlement or after 5 years from the payment of the last installment of salami (whichever is later) the lease would be permanent and lessee would be owner of the land which would be heritable; that last installment of the salami was paid on 10‑4â€......ase is also Reported in: 57 DLR (HCD) (2005) 598. ...... any order as to cost. Me judgments and decrees of both the Courts below are hereby set aside and decreed the suit accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (HCD) (2005) 598. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3
Mahmuda Begum and others Vs. Chairman, First Court of Settlement and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....cle 10 of PO No.16 of 1972 contemplate that any allotment, lease or agreement granted or entered into before the 25th March, 1971 is binding upon the GovernÂment in the same way as upon the original owner. In the instant case, the agreement for sale being entered into before 25th March, 1971, i.e. ......so Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 247. ......dent No.2 is directed to exclude the said case property from the aforesaid 'Ka' List of abandoned buildings within 60 days from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 247. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2005 | Hits: 33
Sec. Min. of Works and Urban Dev., Govt. of BD & ors Vs. Rowshan Ara Begum & anr, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....t Division in Writ Jurisdiction and obtained the Rule. 7. The High Court Division made the Rule absolute on the findings that the respondents ie, the appellants herein, did not challenge ownership of Sahera Khatun but they challenge ownership of Sahera Khatun’s daughter Anwari Kha...... ......background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. 18. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 15 May, 2005 | Hits: 120
Jamuna Builders Ltd. and another Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ithout obtaining approved plan which is not permitted under the Building Construction Act, 1952 as amended. She has referred to Rule 7(5) of the Building Construction Rules, 1996 and submits that the owner of the proposed building should have served prior notice 7 days ahead of such construction. Su......in: 57 DLR (2005) 762. ...... the Building Construction Rules, 1996. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 762. ..Category: Administrative Law, Company Law | Date: 9 May, 2005 | Hits: 9
Debobrota Baiddya @ Debu Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....f the house of Prafula Saha when Chinmoy told her that both of them were going to their private teacher to read. 11. Prosecution witness Sunil Kumar Karmakar, aged 53 years, stated that he was the owner of jewellery shop named Shoma Jewellers at Madaripur Gold Patti that some 8 to eight and a hal...... years, was a student of Class IX of local SM Model Government High School Science Section. On 1- 6-2002 at 7-15 hours in the morning accused appellant on the pretext of going to private tutor called and took away his son Chinmoy from his rented residence of 243, Udayan Road, Battala, PS and Distric......ganj PS Case No. 3 dated 3-11-2002 under sections 6/7 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 and he be discharged from his bail bonds. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 71...Category: Women and Children | Date: 9 May, 2005 | Hits: 84
Category: Property Law | Date: 3 May, 2005 | Hits: 3
Md. Abdur Rahman Faroque Vs. Md. Shamsul Hoque and another , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....suit premises but later on it was found that the defendant No.2, the appellant, was carrying on trade of retail medicine in the suit premises beyond the knowledge of the landlord, that the aforesaid owner died leaving Debendra Nath Basu who sold the suit premises on June 1, 1995 to plaintiff's fath......(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdur Rahman Faroque………………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Shamsul Hoque and another……………………………..Respondent Judgment May 2, 2005. Result: ......he background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 181. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 2 May, 2005 | Hits: 119
Asadul Hossain (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 DLR (HCD)
....upports the prosecution case indirectly by expressing the prevailing situation of that time which is very much pertinent in this context. 22. We cannot subscribe ourselves to believe that as the owner of the house and his sons and daughter and other inmates of the house were not cited as witnes......espondent. Criminal Appeal No. 1381 of 2002 with Criminal Appeal No. 1396 of 2002 with Criminal Rule No. 152(R) of 2002. Judgment Md. Ashfaqul Islam J.- Criminal Appeal No.1381 of 2002 and Criminal Appeal No.1396 of 2002 preferred by the convict appellant Md. Asadul Hossain and Mukul ......shall be counted from their date of arrest. Send down the lower court records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 615. ..Category: Arms Law, Criminal Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 9
Bangladesh rep. by Sec., Ministry of Works Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
...., Section 42 The plaintiff was in possession after the agreement for sale which was entered into on 10-7-1969 and he could defend his possession against anyone except the real owner…….(6) Lawyers Involved: B Hossain......; Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works........Appellant Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others ..................Respondents Judgment March 27, 2005. ...... the argument advanced by Mr. B Hossain and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is affirmed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 101
Ali Hossen @ Ali & another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....risonment for 10 years is set aside and/or struck down. The petitioners be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 1. ...... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Md. Emdadul Huq J Ali Hossen @ Ali & another……………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others………………………….Respondent Judgment March 20, 2005. Result: The......ification in the official gazette extend this section to any particular place where possession of such non-fire arms without licence and against the manner permitted shall be an offence rendering the possessors liable to be prosecuted. If such notification is issued by the Government and published i..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 71