Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1981-1984 of 1984 results.
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......of duplex board on an undertaking to re-export those within two years from the date of the release of the consignment and in case of failure to re-export, to pay on demand, twice the amount of import duty as may be leviable thereon. The Ministry of Finance was pleased to forward the said application..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e dead bodies of night guard, Abdul Mannan and treasurer Abul Kalam Azad lying in the delivery room could understand that the dacoits looted away cash from the post office killing those two staffs on duty there. The informant then lodged First Information Report at Brahmanbaria Police Station withou..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ...... try that issue first even without settling issues of fact. The whole object of this provision seems to be that if there is any issue of law on which the entire suit may be disposed of it is the duty of the Court to try that issue first at the earliest opportunity so that the Court may not..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......d rightly pointed out that if any one is aggrieved by the new legislation, that is, by section 15 Ka Ka of the Bank Companies Act, he can raise the question in an appropriate Court and his prime duty was to hold the AGM as per direction of the Court but inspite of repeated request and reminder ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
351331330324