Judgment search - Chancery Law Chronicles

Displaying 1981-2000 of 3679 results.

Norendra Chandra Dash and others Vs. Md. Solaiman Chowdhury & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)

....fraudulent, collusive and not binding upon the plaintiffs. 3. In the plaint the plaintiffs stated, inter alia that plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and defendant No.5 are the owners in possession of the suit land along with other lands appertaining to khatian No.114 of mouza Ullashwar, that plaintiff No.3 h......e. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 81. ...... petitioner’s application for amendment of the plaint. 2. Petitioners as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 67 of 1990 in the Court of Additional Assistant Judge, Chandpur seeking declaration that the registered Saf Kabalas being 1107, 1108 and 1109 dated 30-1-86 of Laksham Registry Office ar...... is thus set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 81. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98

Kala Miah Vs. Gopal Chandra Paul and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

....ituted Title Suit No. 63 of 1985 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chandpur impleading the respondents as defendants praying for declaration of title by adverse possession in respect of the suit land described in schedule to the plaint, and for declaration that the judgment and decree passed on......ower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 77. ...... Subordinate Judge, Chandpur in Title Suit No. 63 of 1985. By the impugned judgment dated 30-6-1986 the learned Subordinate Judge, dismissed the suit. 2. The short fact leading to this appeal is, that the appellant as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 63 of 1985 in the Court of the Subordinate ......dy vs. Nageswari Debi, 8 DLR 65; 531A 89; AIR 1930 Patna 610 (Harihar Prasad vs. Sifi Gurugranth Saheb); Karam Ilahi vs. Share-ud-Din, 35 Indian Cases 14; AIR 1927 (Cal) 197 and Kelyana Sundaram vs. Korurps (1927), 50 (Mad). Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Mustafa, Advocate — For the Appellant. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51

QC Shipping Limited and another Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

....esult, I make this Rule absolute without any order as to costs. The order of stay is consequently disposed of as being infructuous. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 64. ......sain J QC Shipping Limited and another………………Petitioners Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and others……………………….... Respondents Judgment August 6, 1998. Cases Referred to- Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. vs. Bangladesh and others, 39 DLR (AD)......company owns two container vessels and has invested about US$ 40.00 million on the project in private sector as per policy of the Government. One of the conditions of the said foreign investment was that the company shall be allowed to use their own equipment for the purpose of movement of their con...... Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Md. Mozammel Hossain J QC Shipping Limited and another………………Petitioners Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and others……………………….... Respondents Judgment August 6, 1998...

Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 583

Arbi Khanom and 4 others Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

.... of 1999. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- In all these 5 Rules obtained by different petitioners the respondents were called upon to show cause as to why the order of requisition of their respective land comprising CS plot No.194 of Mouja Aliganj, PS Fatullah, District Narayanganj passed by the res......ged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 367. ......ion was made by the Government under section 5(7) of the Act and the land in question was not finally acquired and the petitioner did not get the final payment of compensation. The petitioner claims that the possession of the land was not handed over in favour of the Government. The petitioner, ther......46 DLR (AD) 89; 51 DLR (AD) 84; Bangladesh and others Vs. Commercial Trust of Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 46 DLR (AD) 89; 27 DLR 597; 51 DLR (AD) 84. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Obaidul Hasan Shaheen, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. W..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37

Sharif and Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

....ion. In the above view, this Rule is discharged. We do not award any cost having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 362. ......cts and circumstances of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 362. ...... No. 86 of 1998. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J. - This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 2-12-97 in File No. CEVT/Case/ (CRF) Review-Chatta- 07/97 relating to the cancelling of CRF by the Review Committee, Chittagong vide order dated ...... Judgment February 13, 2000. Cases Referred To- Indian jurisdiction viz. AIR 1968 (SC) 1186; AIR 1962 (SC) 1621 15; AIR 1980 (SC) 1986. Lawyers Involved: AFM Hassan Arif, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Not represented — the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 86 of 1998. Judg..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 93

Abdul Jabber and others Vs. Mohammad Sekander and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

....ing the prayer for pre-emption opposite party No. I filed pre-emption case against the present petitioner and others. Case of the pre-emptor, in short, is that the opposite party 2 to 4 sold the case land on 6-11-86 to the opposite party 1 without giving notice to the petitioner who is co-sharer of ......bul Kalam Azad, Advocate — For the Petitioners. Rabishanker Chakraborty, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2147 of 1992. Judgment Abu Sayeed Ahammed J.- This Rule has been issued at the instance of the pre-emptee against the judgment and order dated 22-7-92 passed......e State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. Dismissing the prayer for pre-emption opposite party No. I filed pre-emption case against the present petitioner and others. Case of the pre-emptor, in short, is that the opposite party 2 to 4 sold the case land on 6-11-86 to the opposite party 1 without giving n......……………….Petitioners Vs. Mohammad Sekander and others ………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment May 24, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Abul Kalam Azad, Advocate — For the Petitioners. Rabishanker Chakraborty, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revisi..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67

Habibur Rahman Paikar (Md.) Vs. Gour Gopal Datta and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

...., petitioner Md. Habibur Rahman Paikar as plaintiff instituted a Suit in the 2nd Court of Munsif, Sadar Bogra, being, other Class Suit No.157 of 1977, praying for declaration of his title in the suit land alleging, inter alia, that the suit land comprising an area of 1762-1/2 acres out of 3525 acres...... Vs. Gour Gopal Datta and others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment April 28, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Bivash Chandra Biswas with SS Halder, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 218......d 29-6-1983 passed by the Second Court of Munsif, Bogra in Other Class Suit No.153 of 1977 dismissing the suit has been called in question. 2. Short facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that, petitioner Md. Habibur Rahman Paikar as plaintiff instituted a Suit in the 2nd Court of Munsif,......��……….Petitioner Vs. Gour Gopal Datta and others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment April 28, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Bivash Chandra Biswas with SS Halder, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 88

Basihur Rahman Biswas Vs. Md. Hanif Ali Biswas & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....e plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit being Title Suit No.19 of 1983 in the Court of Munsif, Second Court Khulna, against the defendant opposite parties praying for declaration of his title in the suit land contending inter alia, that 0.47 acre of land mentioned in the Schedule 1 to the plaint, origin...... records forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 346. ......a suit being Title Suit No.19 of 1983 in the Court of Munsif, Second Court Khulna, against the defendant opposite parties praying for declaration of his title in the suit land contending inter alia, that 0.47 acre of land mentioned in the Schedule 1 to the plaint, originally belonged to one Minhaj G......s………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Hanif Ali Biswas & others.…………Opposite Parties Judgment August 25, 1999. Case Referred To- Shaik Ibrahim Vs. Shaik Suleman 9 JLR Born 146. Lawyers Involved: Shahidur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioner. KS Zaman with A..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72

Syed Ahmed Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

....e morning of 24-3-84 he got information that the police of Chauddagram recovered a male dead body from Dakatia river at Hossainpur who identified the said dead body to be his father. The deceased has land dispute with Mohan Mia and others and it was suspected that out of enmity they murdered his fat......resent: Kazi Ebadul Hoque J AK Badrul Huq J Syed Ahmed…………….Petitioner Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others…………………..Opposite Parties Judgment April 1, 1998. Cases Referred to- Seraj Din vs. Kala and another, PLD 1964 SC 26=16 DLR SC 94; Lalu vs. State, PL...... is required under section 164 of the Code and the statement is not tenable in law and the confession is no confession in the eye of law. (iii) In the First Information Report there is no mention that accused Abdul Khaleque took his father from his house on 19-3-84 and the FIR being the earliest ......vs. State of Bihar (1973) 2 SCC 424; Syed Mushtaq Ahmed vs. Siddiqullah and others, PLD 1975 SC 160; Kashem Ali vs. State and others, 40 DLR (AD) 294 and Abdur Rashid Khondker vs. Chandu Master & ors, 16 DLR (SC) 605. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahmud Hossain, Advocate — For the Petitioner. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42

State Vs. Babul Miah, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....al. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. The accused respondent is discharged of his bail bond. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 35, 7 LG (AD) (2010) 203, VIII ADC (2011) 66.......o Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 35, 7 LG (AD) (2010) 203, VIII ADC (2011) 66....... police, who later on made a confessional statement on 11th July, 1990 which was recorded by A.K.M. Humayan Kabir (P.W.13), a Magistrate, First Class. In his confessional statement Babul Miah stated that on 29th March, 1990 he came to Akhawara at about 11 p.m. where he met Abdul Jabber at Harashpur,......Kumar Sinha J The State ...............................Appellant Vs. Babul Miah .........................Respondent Judgment April 7, 2010. Cases Referred To- Balmakund Vs. Emperor, AIR 1931; Nishi Kant Jha Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1969 SC 422. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Zah..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58

Mohamaya Rani Saha and others Vs. Dr. Ashequr Rahman Khan and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

.... the petitioners both in Civil Petition Nos.1498 and 1499 of 2007 and respondent No.1 in Civil Petition No. 1333 of 2008, on the averments that in C.S. Dag No.3123 Altabuddin owned 05 decimal of viti land in Khatian No.1590, Kafiluddin owned 05 decimals of land in C.S. Khatian No.1591, Ukiluddin own...... Petition No. 1333 of 2008). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1498-99 of 2007. And Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1333 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 9.11.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3257 of 2003). Judgment Md. Tafazzul Is......f law involved are also same and both the petitioners are heard together and disposed of by this judgment. 2. Facts of Civil Revision No.3257 of 2003 as placed before the High Court Division, are that Dr. Ashequr Rahman, the respondent No.1 in Civil Petition No. 1498 of 2007 and the petitioner in......thers.............Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 1333 of 2008) Judgment November 9, 2008. Lawyer Involved: A.K. Badrul Huq, Advocate, instructed by A.K. M.Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner (In Civil Petition Nos. 1498-1499 of 2007). Asaduzzaman, Advocate, instruc..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62

Dijalal Majumder Vs. Munshi Bodiul Alam and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

...., Noakhali, decreeing the Title Suit No.188 of 1988 declaring that the ex parte decree obtained by the defendant No.1 of the suit as plaintiff in Title Suit No. 808 of 1977 so far relates to the suit land is collusive, fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiff-respondent hereof. 2. The respon......am Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No.1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-14. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1786 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 26.05.2009 passed-by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4712 of 2002.) Judgment Shah Abu Nayeem.......11 of 1997 filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 21.01.1997 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, 1st Additional Court, Noakhali, decreeing the Title Suit No.188 of 1988 declaring that the ex parte decree obtained by the defendant No.1 of the suit as plaintiff in Title Suit No. 80......ijalal Majumder........................Petitioner Vs. Munshi Bodiul Alam and others .............Respondents Judgment July 15, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Ibrahim Khalil, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No.1. Not rep..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Md. Anowar Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh Jute Corporation and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....ffs filed the Title Suit No.10 of 1997 for declaration of their title through adverse possession and that the tender notice described in the 'Kha’ schedule of the plaint in respect of 'Ka' schedule land of the plaint if is illegal, collusive and not binding upon the plaintiffs. 3. Facts relevan...... Anowar Hossain and others..................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Jute Corporation and others............................Respondents Judgment June 6, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Zainul Abedin, Advocate-in-on-Recor......arayanganj, decreeing the Title Suit No.10 of 1997 in part. 2. The leave petitioners as plaintiffs filed the Title Suit No.10 of 1997 for declaration of their title through adverse possession and that the tender notice described in the 'Kha’ schedule of the plaint in respect of 'Ka' schedule la...... Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Anowar Hossain and others..................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Jute Corporation and others............................Respondents Judgment June 6, 2010. Lawyers..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58

Abdur Rashid Vs. Afzal Gazi and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....4, 148 and 170 belonged to the plaintiffs who are owner on the basis of records of right, by way of inheritance and by purchase and by accretions from the river Bishkhali on the western side of their land of the above mentioned khatians, which the predecessors of the plaintiffs have been possessing ......vision (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Abdur Rashid.........................Petitioner Vs. Afzal Gazi and others...............Respondents .............................Petitioner Vs. Afzal Gazi and others...............Respondents Judgment May 3, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quiyum, Senior Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate instructed by Harid......rendra Kumar Sinha J Abdur Rashid.........................Petitioner Vs. Afzal Gazi and others...............Respondents Judgment May 3, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quiyum, Senior Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Fazlul Kari..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Abdul Majid Pramanik and others Vs. Md. Sorhab Ali and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....dated 6th August, 2.009 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3069 of 2008. 2. Petitioners instituted the Miscellaneous Case. No. 23 of 1997 for pre-emption of the case land under section 24 of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act. According to them, .06½ acre of land of ...... Abdul Majid Pramanik and others ..........................Petitioners Vs. Md. Sorhab Ali and others ............................................Respondents Judgment July 25, 2010. Cases Referred To- Abdul Khaleque Vs. Abdul Noor and others, 11 MLR (AD) 175; Korban Ali Khan (Md....... 2. Petitioners instituted the Miscellaneous Case. No. 23 of 1997 for pre-emption of the case land under section 24 of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act. According to them, .06½ acre of land of S.A. Khatian No.1160 corresponding to S.A. Plot No. 689 and .05 acre of land of Plot No.688 of the same Kh...... Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Abdul Majid Pramanik and others ..........................Petitioners Vs. Md. Sorhab Ali and others ............................................Respondents Judgment July 25,..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54

Fatema Khatun Vs. Wach Khatun and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

...., hereinafter referred to as the Code. 10. The learned Advocate further submits that on the basis of the documents both the Courts below by the concurrent finding came to the opinion that the suit land appertains to Khatian No.123 and there was no scope for any doubt as to identity as to the land......urt Division (Civil) Present: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Fatema Khatun……….…Appellant Vs. Wach Khatun and others…………….Respondents Judgment March 5, 1998. Case Referred to- Nurul Hossain vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 49 DLR (AD) 108. Lawyer......Send down the LC records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 28. ......…….Respondents Judgment March 5, 1998. Case Referred to- Nurul Hossain vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 49 DLR (AD) 108. Lawyers Involved: Mahinudul Islam, Advocate — For the Appellant. Kh Mahbubuddin Ahmed with S M Munir, Advocates — For the Respondents. App..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59

Fatema Begum Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....tion Case No. 25 of 2001 (arising out of Mortgage Suit No. 72 of 1996). 2. The petitioner’s case in short is that her father late Dudu Mian was the lawful owner in possession of 8.04 decimals of land out of 20 decimals appertaining to C.S. Khatian No. 278, Dag No. 354 corresponding to S.A. Khat......a Begum…………….....Petitioner Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others………….... Respondents Result: The Rule is made absolute. Judgment November 11, 2010. Case Referred to- Md. Delwar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh and others, 24 BLD (HC) 323. Lawyers Involv......l Procedure and section 57 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 in Mortgage Decree Execution Case No. 25 of 2001 (arising out of Mortgage Suit No. 72 of 1996). 2. The petitioner’s case in short is that her father late Dudu Mian was the lawful owner in possession of 8.04 decimals of land out of 20 ....... Judgment November 11, 2010. Case Referred to- Md. Delwar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh and others, 24 BLD (HC) 323. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq with Shahjada Al-Amin Kabir, Advocates-for the Petitioner. M. Shafiullah, Advocate-for Respondent No. 2. M.A. Samad with M.G.H. Ruhull..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 183

Md. Chinimuddin Malitha Vs. Rahejan Bibi, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....ents inter alia, that she was an illiterate and a simple woman living in village and suffering from mental illness. Her full brother, the defendant (herein the petitioner) cultivated their father’s land and she would have proportionate share of the crops produced. In late Aswin, 1384 B.S the defen......Supreme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ruhul Quddus J Md. Chinimuddin Malitha ... ………………Petitioner Vs. Rahejan Bibi since deceased substituted by her legal heirs Md. Sukur Ali Shaikh and another ... ……………Opposite Par......o.50 of 1986 affirming those dated 22.2.1986 passed by the Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Baraigram, Natore in Other Class Suit No. 22 of 1985 decreeing the suit. 2. It appears from the order book that the Rule was issued on 14.11.1988 and initially it was numbered as Civil Revision No.627 of 1988......ahejan Bibi since deceased substituted by her legal heirs Md. Sukur Ali Shaikh and another ... ……………Opposite Parties Judgment January 2, 2011. Lawyers Involved: No one appears for either of the parties. Civil Revision No.8346 of 1991 Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J. - Th..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54

Badal Kumar Paul Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....l. IV, second print and edition, 1954. It is found in the wild or is cultivated, of course, in secret in and around the south and east of Afghanistan popularly known as the Golden Crescent and in the land blocked area surrounded by Myanmar, Thailand and Laos called Golden Triangle. Poppy is a wild o......the Directorate of Narcotics for guidance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 218.......99, which convicted him under section 19(1), Table 3 (খ) of the Narcotics Control Act, 1990, in brief, the Act, and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 5‑11‑97 at about 9‑10 AM the police found 250 bottles of Phensidyl, each contained 100 ...... Vs. State……….……………………………..………..Respondent Judgment March 12, 2003. Cases Referred To- Nannu Miah Vs. State, 55 DLR 7; State Vs. Miss Eliadah Maccord, 1996 BLD (AD) 239 = 2 BLC (AD) 157. Lawyers Involved: M Shamsul Hoque Advocate-For the Ap..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90

Md. Riaz Uddin Khan, Advocate and another Vs. Mahmudur Rahman and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....oever" [Wilmot,J. in Sparks V. Martyn (1669), 1 Vent.1]. These observations are followed by Cockburn, CJ. "In the case of superior Courts at Westminister, which represent the one Supreme Court of the land, this power was co-eval with their original constitution, and has always been exercised by them......Advocate and another………………………………. Petitioners. Vs. Mahmudur Rahman and others…………………………………….Respondents. Judgment August 19, 2010. Cases Referred to- Sparks V. Martyn (1669), 1 Vent.1. R.V. Lefroy, (1873) L.R.8 QB 134, Re. Abdool......lson Vs. Judges H.C.Lahore, 16 DLR (SC) 535, King Emperor V.Khwaja Nazir Ahmed AIR 1945 P.C. 18, D.C. Saxena case, (1996) 5 SCC 216, Bathina Ramkrishna Reddy V. State of Madras, AIR 1952 SC 149, Arundhati Roy, (2002) 3 SCC 343, P.N. Duda V. P Shiv Shankar, (1988) 3 SCC 167, Baradakanta Mishra V. Reg...... Judgment August 19, 2010. Cases Referred to- Sparks V. Martyn (1669), 1 Vent.1. R.V. Lefroy, (1873) L.R.8 QB 134, Re. Abdool, 8 WR Cr 31, Sukhdev Singh V. Teja Singh, AIR 1954 SC 186, Emperor V. B.G. Horniman, AIR 1945 All 1 p. 4 (M), Andre Paul and Terence Ambard V. The Attorney General ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 163

Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search