Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2001-2020 of 3391 results.
Alauddin (Md.) Vs. State and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....igh Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Mir Hashmat Ali J ABM Hatem Ali Alauddin (Md.) ………………………………………Petitioner Vs. State and others……………………………………..Opposite-Parties. Judgment June 29, 2005......f the nature of the case on attachment appointed the Officer-in-Charge of Mirsarai Police Station as receiver and receiver is none but a police officer and he cannot be dispossessed from the disputed property since he has authority to arrest anyone and send him to jail and also prosecute him for com..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Abdus Salam (Md.) Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....te Jurisdiction) Present: MA Wahhab Miah J Zinat Ara J Abdus Salam (Md.)……………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and others……………………………Respondents. Judgment March 16, 2005. Cases Refe......other registrations of the trade mark 'Crocodile' in the name of the different companies vide registration Nos. 18366, 18378 and 19935 in class 25. These findings of the Deputy Registrar are based on proper and correct appreciation of the facts and the circumstances of the case and the evidence prod..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Ismail Howlader and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 335.......or and the merit of the case as a whole and acquitted the accused persons including the child. In consideration of the merit of the case it was further held that the retrial of the child would not be proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 26. Turning back to the question of legality o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Nil Sen Singh Vs. Radha Mohan Singh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....nal Jurisdiction) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Md. Rais Uddin J Nil Sen Singh…………………………………………………………...Petitioner Vs. Radha Mohan Singh and others …………………………………Opposite Parties. Judgment April 24, 2006. ......bordinate Judge, Mouivibazar, which was subsequently transferred to the Court of Joint District Judge, First Court, Mouivibazar, for partition of his 2/3 rd share out of 2.782/3 acres in the schedule properties. 3. The case of the plaintiff, in short, is that Babu Ram Singh was the owner of the s..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Noorjahan Ahmed and others Vs. Tarifuddin Ahmed, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 326.......d obtained a decree dated 1 7-11-1984. It was specifically stated that the defendant appellants were not residing at the addresses shown in the plaint rather they were residing at Dhaka. There was no proper service upon them as summons was fraudulently suppressed. 3. The defendant contested the s..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
....Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Tariq-ul-Hakim J
Afzal Hossain Ahmed J
Faruque Hasan…………………………………………………...Petitioner
Vs.
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Ltd. and others……..Respondents
Judgment
August 16, 2005.
Cases......t at Demra, Dhaka should not be declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.
2. In Writ Petition No.9 of 2002 Rule Nisi has been issued calling upon the respondents t..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Ahad Vs. State and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....riminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Anwarul Haque J Farah Mahbub J Abdul Ahad…………………………………………………………Accused Petitioner Vs. State and another……………………………………………….Opposite Parties. Judgment O...... of the petitioner in Criminal Appeal No. 86 of 1987 arising out of CR Case No. 206 of 87 should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Facts leading to disposal of the Rule are as follows: Opposite-party No.2 Abdur Rah..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Kazi Moniruzzaman and others Vs. Kazi Nuruzzaman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 306.......ted as follows; The predecessors of the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 1 and 2 Kazi Abul Kashem filed Title Suit No. 153 of 1992 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, First Court, Dhaka claiming the suit property to have been acquired by him in the benami of his two sons defendant Nos. 1 and 2 namely, K..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Abdur Rashid Salam Vs. Md. Moniruzzaman, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioner Vs. Md. Moniruzzaman …………………………………………………..Opposite Party. Judgment July 19, 2005. Cases Referred to- S. Azizul Hassan and another Vs. Malik Ghulam Muhammad, 1971 SCMR 123; Shankar Rao and others Vs. Raghunath Rao, AIR ......the relief claimed is undervalued, and the plaintiff, on being required by the Court to correct the valuation within a time to be fixed by the Court fails to do so; (c) Where the relief claimed is properly valued, but the plaint is written upon paper insufficiently stamped, and the plaintiff, on ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Amin Uddin (Md.) Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....Rule was issued under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure at the instance of accused petitioner Md. Amin Uddin calling upon the sole state opposite party represented by Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate, Brahmanbaria to show cause as to why the proceedings or Nari-o-Shishu Nirja...... 2000 as amended, now pending in the Court of Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal, Brahmanbaria should not be quashed or to pass such other or further order or orders as this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Pending disposal of the Rule further proceedings as above was stayed. 3. Rule was m..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Motleb Mondal Vs. State & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....e & others ……………………………………………...Accused-Opposite Parties. Judgment August 29, 2005. Cases Referred to: 18 DLR (SC) 474; 6 BLC 17; Nur Elahi Vs. State and others, 8 DLR (SC) 474. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamsul Huda, Advocate—For the Petitioner.......s Court witnesses under section 540 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be examined in Sessions Case 28/2001 should not be set aside or pass such other order or orders as this court may deem fit and proper. Rule was made returnable within 4 weeks. 2. Pending hearing of the Rule further proceedin..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Sonali Bank Limited and others Vs. M/s. Fair Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd. and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....is Order is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 52. ......on to examine a witness, is an exceptional one and should be used carefully and only after being fully satisfied that there is no other way to examine the said witness whose evidence is necessary for proper disposal of the suit. An occasional illness or temporary infirmity is not enough to allow a c..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Kabir Ahmed Sawdagar Vs. Md. Syed Saifuddin Jaheed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....vil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Md. Rais Uddin J Kabir Ahmed Sawdagar…………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Md. Syed Saifuddin Jaheed and others…………………………Opposite Parties. Judgment March 7, 2006. Case Refe......ant for the purpose Of this case are that the suit land belonged to Md. Ibrahim and RS khatian was prepared in his name who died leaving 3(three) sons and 3(three) daughters and a widow who got their property and they separated their share by agreement held in a salish dated 28-1-1957 and again thei..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Kazi Rashed Akhter Shahid (Prince) Vs. Rokshana Choudhury (Sanda), 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Md. Rais Uddin J Kazi Rashed Akhter Shahid (Prince)…………………Petitioner Vs. Rokshana Choudhury (Sanda)………………………..Opposite Party. Judgment February 27, 2006. Cases Referre......wer amount of the marriage, if any, according to her status cannot be more than 30,000 (thirty thousand). He further submits that the judgment and decree passed by the learned lower Court are neither proper nor in accordance with law and, as such, the impugned judgment and decree caused serious inju..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 184
State Vs. Harun Chowdhury, District Magistrate and Mostafa Kamal, SP Sylhet, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ivil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mozammel Hossain J Md. Abdul Hye J State…………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Harun Chowdhury, District Magistrate and Mostafa Kamal, SP Sylhet…………… Contemners-Opposite Parties. Judgment May 24, 2005...... by this Hon'ble Court and that since they tender unconditional apology and undertake that they would not repeat the same thing in the future, the Hon'ble Court may pass any order as it deems fit and proper. 7. We have heard the learned Advocates of both the contemners and the learned Assistant Atto..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 1272
MA Salam Vs. Additional District Judge & Dewlia Adalat, Chittagong and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....in J Zubayer Rahman Chowdhury J MA Salam…………………………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Additional District Judge & Dewlia Adalat, Chittagong and another…… Respondents. Judgment November 17, 2005. Cases Referred to- Messrs S......respondent No. 1 should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner is the proprietor of M/s MA Salam and Company. The respondent No. 1 is ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Abdur Razzaque Zoarder and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 245. ......nd is of no legal effect and why the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 shall not be directed to withdraw and cancel the same and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. It is the case of the five petitioners that upon obtaining their Diplomas in Engineeri..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Alimuddin and others Vs. Abdul Kabir and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 240.......002 passed by the Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Kishoreganj in Title Appeal No. 372 of 1993 should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court deems fit and proper. 2. Short facts necessary for the purpose of the Rule is that the petitioners as plaintiff..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Shomurunessa and others Vs. Md. Musa Miah and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....s to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 228. ......Nos. 1-6 to show cause as to why the delay of 309 days in filing this revisional application should not be condoned and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. None appears to support the Rule. 3. Mr. Md. Ibrahim Mollah, the learned Advocate, ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Golap Vs. Md. Abdul Hakim & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....cause as to why the portion of impugned order dated 6-10-98 passed in Title Suit No. 59 of 1996 by the Assistant Judge, Muktagacha Court, Mymensingh so far it relates to passing an order of abatement and allowing the petition for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased defendant is concerned......owing the petition for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased defendant is concerned should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Before the issuance of the Rule delay of 29 days was condoned. The plaintiff-opposite ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
47964791479047894788478647854784478247814779477747764775477147704765476247594758