Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
..... 473 of 1978 and 135 of 1979 dismissing both the suits, heard and disposed of analogously. 2. The two plaintiff-respondents filed Title Suit No. 473 of 1978, against the defendant appellant for his eviction from the suit premises and for realisation of arrear rent and compensation, as al......, title and possession in the suit premises has been decreed. 4. The plaintiff-respondents also filed Title Suit No. 135 of 1979 in the same court against the same defendant-appellant for a declaration that the aforesaid compromise decree dated 19.7.77 in Title Suit No. 1 of 1977 was ille..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... to Shahjadi Begum Wakf Estate from which they got settlement and established their shops. Having learnt that the Dhaka Municipal Authorities were going to demolish their shops they filed the suit for declaration of their title; they also prayed for temporary injunction against apprehended demol......Shahjadi Begum Wakf Estate from which they got settlement and established their shops. Having learnt that the Dhaka Municipal Authorities were going to demolish their shops they filed the suit for declaration of their title; they also prayed for temporary injunction against apprehended demolitio..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....ppeal No. 5 of 1986 (Review against the Judgment and Order dated 20.7.87 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 5 of 1986). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J: This is plaintiff’s appeal by leave for review of a judgment of this Court dated 20.7.87 in Civil Appeal No. 5 of 1986, reported in 40 D...... judgment and order passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division on 16.9.85 in Civil Revision Case No. 720 of 1984. 2. The plaintiff‑appellant filed Title Suit No. 355 of 1976 for declaration of title and also for a declaration that the registered deed No. 12145 dated 11.7.75, by..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....in question is whether the "certificate", as required of that the appellants, under Rules that the goods in from question are Government properties and that these that goods are intended for "consumption or use for official purpose only" is mandatory, or mere directory. In ot......s the certificate as referred to in the Third Schedule of the Rules. 9. The learned Additional Attorney‑General has next referred to Rule 13 of the Octroi Rules and has argued that no declaration was sought for from the appellants by the respondent, lessee. Rule 13 relates to destin..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Judge of the High Court Division, Chittagong Bench, affirmed those of the first appellate Court by judgment and decree dated 16‑1‑85. 5.The plaintiff‑respondent's suit was for declaration of tide and confirmation of possession or alternatively khas possession in the land......e of the High Court Division, Chittagong Bench, affirmed those of the first appellate Court by judgment and decree dated 16‑1‑85. 5.The plaintiff‑respondent's suit was for declaration of tide and confirmation of possession or alternatively khas possession in the land of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... is the self‑acquired property of her husband and items 2‑6 thereof are immovable properties inherited by her husband from his deceased mother. Items 7 and 8 were purchased by her husband from proforma‑defendant Nos. 8‑12 by various kabalas Schedule Kha property contains the description of t......settled by Bisudaanandh Mahathero who was never empowered by the plaintiff to do so, nor did the plaintiff empower her father to sign any partition arrangement on her behalf. The plaintiff prayed for declaration of title and joint possession in Schedule Ka land. declaration of title and recovery of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Rupban Bibi Vs. Aynal Kha and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....he plaintiff is directed against the judgment of the High Court Division, Jessore Bench, passed in Civil Revision No. 249 of 1985 reversing the judgments of the courts below allowing an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The plaint......of 1985 reversing the judgments of the courts below allowing an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The plaintiff bought a suit for declaration that the order of the Circle Officer, Revenue in Misc. Case No. 110 of 1973‑74 un..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Mujibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....any narrow or restricted sense, but in a sense beneficial to the widest possible amplitude of the powers. No writ against the decision of the Appellate Tribunal The power to create an appellate forum can be found from the proviso to Article 117(2) of the Constitution and the Supreme Court was ......t of the country must have the last say in laying down the laws relating to matters described in the sub‑clauses of clause (2) of Article 117. By insertion of section 6A the Parliament has made the declaration as per clause (4) of Article 103. The Act VII of 1981 has now provided all the necessary..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Jamuna Oil Company Limited and another Vs.SK Dey and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....affirmance of those of the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka dated 31.10.89 in Title Suit No. 169 of 1984, decreeing the suit. 2. Respondent No. 1 as plaintiff instituted the suit for a declaration that the order of dismissal from service passed by defendant No. 1 Appellant Jamu......ance of those of the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka dated 31.10.89 in Title Suit No. 169 of 1984, decreeing the suit. 2. Respondent No. 1 as plaintiff instituted the suit for a declaration that the order of dismissal from service passed by defendant No. 1 Appellant Jamuna. Oi..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Abdus Sattar Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others , 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rrent decree of the courts below and dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, Title Suit No. 89 of 1964. 2. The said suit in the Additional Court of the Assistant Judge, Sylhet Sadar, was one for declaration of title and khas possession in respect of ‑/4/‑ annas share (schedule......t decree of the courts below and dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, Title Suit No. 89 of 1964. 2. The said suit in the Additional Court of the Assistant Judge, Sylhet Sadar, was one for declaration of title and khas possession in respect of ‑/4/‑ annas share (schedule 2) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Chand Mia and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Respondent No. 1 obtained an ex parte decree on 30‑5‑84 in Title Suit No. 305 of 1983 in the 1st Court of Munsif, Dhaka against the plaintiff‑appellant and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 for specific performance of a contract for sale of the suit land. The decree was put into executio......ecree for the first time on 11 ‑8‑84 on receipt of a notice under section 82 CPC arising out of the said execution case. The appellant as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 272 of 1986 for declaration that the ex parte decree dated 30‑5-84 passed in Title Suit No. 305 of 1983 in th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Aziz Molla, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....No. 295 of 1969). Judgment: MH Rahman J: Respondents filed Title suit No. 21 of 1966 for a declaration that the order dated 17th December, 1963 of the Additional Deputy Commissioner (R......5 of 1969). Judgment: MH Rahman J: Respondents filed Title suit No. 21 of 1966 for a declaration that the order dated 17th December, 1963 of the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Rev) Ba..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 178
Sahera Khatun and another Vs. Anwara Khatun and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... in Civil Revision No. 837 of 1985 discharging the Rule and upholding the concurrent decree of the Courts below in Title Suit No. 197 of 1977. 2. Plaintiff‑respondent No. 1 filed the aforesaid suit, originally numbered as Title Suit No. 68 of 1974 in the Third Court of the Subordina...... filed the aforesaid suit, originally numbered as Title Suit No. 68 of 1974 in the Third Court of the Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and on transfer to the Fourth Court renumbered as above praying for a declaration that the decree dated 20.9.72 passed in Title Suit No. 35 of 1971 by the Subordinate Ju..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Korban Ali Talukder @ Korap Ali Talukder Vs. Abdul Jalil Sarkar and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... Bench) in Civil Revision No. 895 of 1979 setting aside the concurrent judgment and decree of the Courts below dismissing Title Suit No. 48 of 1971. 2. Plaintiff‑respondent No. 1 instituted the aforesaid suit in the second court of the Assistant Judge, Serajganj for declaration of title to and ......udgment and decree of the Courts below dismissing Title Suit No. 48 of 1971. 2. Plaintiff‑respondent No. 1 instituted the aforesaid suit in the second court of the Assistant Judge, Serajganj for declaration of title to and recovery of Khash possession of the suit land by evicting the, defendant..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Fazar Ali Vs. Sikandar Ali, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....in Second Appeal No.906 of 1968 allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree of the first appellate court reversing the judgment and decree of the trial court arising out of a suit for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession. 2. Plaintiff claims title in the ......cond Appeal No.906 of 1968 allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree of the first appellate court reversing the judgment and decree of the trial court arising out of a suit for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession. 2. Plaintiff claims title in the suit ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Dudu Mia Vs. Ekram Mia Chowdhury, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Appeal No. 343 of 1970) Judgment: ATM Afzal J: In this defendants' appeal by leave, the short question for consideration is whether the High Court Division was justified in the circumstances of the case......, the predecessor‑in‑interest of the principal respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(j), as plaintiff brought other Suit No. 35 of 1969 in the Second Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chittagong for declaration of his title to the suit land described in schedule 1(a) and 2(a) of the plaint. Dudu ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Nasrin Kader Siddiqui Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....the appellant challenged the detention of her husband, Abdul Kader Siddiqui, by an order dated 13th January, 1991 under section 3(1)(a) of the Special Powers Act, 1974. Her case, in brief, is that for recognition of his contributions in the liberation war the detenu was awarded the second highes......he statute [.]….... In my view the words "in an unlawful manner" in sub‑clause (b) of Article 98 (2) have been used deliberately to give meaning and content to the solemn declaration under Article 2 of the Constitution itself that it is the inalienable right of every c..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 365
Mrinal Kanti Guha and others Vs. Brajendra Lal Dhar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... by the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Chittagong allowing Miscellaneous Case No. 56 of 1979 under Order 41 rule 19, CPC. 2. The plaintiff‑appellants' Other Suit No. 95 of 1973 for declaration of title and recovery of possession was decreed against the defendant-responde...... the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Chittagong allowing Miscellaneous Case No. 56 of 1979 under Order 41 rule 19, CPC. 2. The plaintiff‑appellants' Other Suit No. 95 of 1973 for declaration of title and recovery of possession was decreed against the defendant-respondents ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Bangladesh Vs. Shamsuzzoha Nurul Amin Chowdhury and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....;This appeal raises a complex question of interpretation of Section 20(5)(c)(ii) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950. The facts are that the plaintiff-respondents instituted a title suit for declaration of title and for khas possession of the suit lands after evicting the defendants th......s appeal raises a complex question of interpretation of Section 20(5)(c)(ii) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950. The facts are that the plaintiff-respondents instituted a title suit for declaration of title and for khas possession of the suit lands after evicting the defendants theref..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 142
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....p;…....Respondents Judgment January 29, 1976. Cases Referred to: Jagadish Bhargava Vs. Jawaharlal Bhargava and others A.I.R. 1961(S.C.) 832; Secretary of State for India Vs. Mask & Co. L. B. 67 I. A. 222 = A.I.R. 1940 P.C 105; Abdul Rouf and others Vs. Ab......ed by Respondents No. 1 and 2, under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 2. Respondents No. 1 and 2 instituted the suit against the appellant and the remaining respondents for a declaration that there was no valid and enforceable requisition and or acquisition or evictio..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99