Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2081-2100 of 2859 results.
Md. Nazim Uddin Vs. Managing Director and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 690. ....... ......any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 690. ...... Title Appeal No.351 of 1999 affirming the judgment and decree dated 2.6.1999 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Dhamrai, Dhaka in Title Suit No.71 of 1994 dismissing the suit. 2. The plaintiff petitioner instituted Title Suit No.170 of 1992 which subsequently being transferred on tw..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Fazlur Rahman Sikder Vs. Abdul Hashem Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nfirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 687. ......nvolved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 572 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 30th March, 2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 389......nfirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 687. ......akati in Title Appeal No. 99 of 1997 reversing those of dated 19.8.1997 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Rajapur, Jhalakati in Title Suit No.59 of 1996 decreeing the suit. 2. The plaintiff filed the above suit seeking for declaration that sale deed No.3277 executed on 5.7.1962 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Shahin Reza and others Vs. Abdul Hamid & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 682. ......is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 682. ......s on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 682. ......gainst the judgment and order dated 26.07.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4786 of 1999 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 22 of 1998 in the 4th Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka praying fo..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Hazi Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Amena Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 676. ......n: V ADC (2008) 676. ...... not find any ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 676. ......, 1990 of the Court of Assistant Judge, Dacope, Khulna in Title Suit No.36 of 1998 decreeing the same. The suit was filed seeking a decree for permanent injunction. 2. It was the case of the plaintiff that the land measuring 31.51 acres originally belonged to Bhagirath Mondal and others a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Sayed Ahmed Majumder Vs. Samsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 673. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md.Tafazzul Islam Sayed Ahmed Majumder..........................Petitioner Vs. Samsul Hoque and others........................Respondents Judgment July 10, 2006. Lawyer...... or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 673. ......essa died leaving behind two sons defendant No.3 and 4 and one daughter the defendant No.5: Tukku Mia while owning and possessing remaining 8 annas died leaving behind one son Shamsul Huq, the plaintiff No.1, and one daughter, the plaintiff No.2; the plaintiff Nos.3 and 4 are the sons of pl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Rahmat Goni Vs. Mrs. Meherun Nessa & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rrect decision. There is no cogent ground to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 670. ...... instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1217 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 30.07.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 16 of 2002.) ......rrect decision. There is no cogent ground to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 670. ......rected against the judgment and order dated 30.07.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 16 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff filed Title Suit No.33 of 1998 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Manindra Kumar Paul & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 667. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M.Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner and others .......................Petitioners Vs. Manindra Kumar Paul and others .........y or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 667. ......r Paul died in the year 1960 leaving 5 sons; S.A. Khatian No. 54 contained 3.99 acres of land out of which 2.40 acres of land became vested and non-resident property which, within the knowledge of plaintiffs, were settled to different persons including Dr. Moniruzzaman; earlier the plaintiffs fi..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Md. Iftekher Uddin Bhuiyan Vs. Ranjit Kumar Saha & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....n correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 665. ......ted by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 412 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 03.08.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5101 of 2000.) ......n correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 665. ......is petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.08.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5101 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 2. The plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.86 of 1989 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Narsingdi for..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Mosammat Namiran Nessa Vs. Aftaruddin & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....cision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 662. ......er. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-22. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 356 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 16.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3175 of 2002.) ......cision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 662. ......ated 16.08.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3175 of 2002 heard analogously with Civil Revision No.3154 of 2002 making the Rules absolute. 2. The plaintiffs of Other Class Suit No.3 of 1999 instituted the suit in the Court of Assistant Judge, Pa..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Mosammat Ashrafee Begum and others Vs. Md. Siddiqur Rahman Patwari and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ind, the judgment ought have but the result arrived at call for no interference. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 659. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Joynul Abedin J Mosammat Ashrafee Begum and others ........Petitioners Vs. Md. Siddiqur Rahman Patwari and others ........Re......ind, the judgment ought have but the result arrived at call for no interference. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 659. ......led seeking declaration that the judgment and decree dated September 25, 1978 of the Court of Assistant Judge, Faridganj in Title Suit No.19 of 1978 is fraudulent, illegal and not binding upon the plaintiffs. As it appears the said decree was obtained in respect of 6.28 acres of land. Title Suit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
MD, Natore Sugar Mills Ltd, Natore & ors. Vs. Md. Mostafizur Rahman, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 655. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Managing Director, Natore Sugar Mills Limited, Natore and others..........Petitioners Vs. Md. Mostafizur Rahman………&hel......ived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 655. ......judgment and order dated 22.5.2007 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1743 of 2006 making the Rule absolute. 2. The short fact is that the respondent as plaintiff instituted the aforesaid Title Suit No. 175 of 2000 against the defendant-petitioners for..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Secretary, Zilla Parishad, Faridpur Vs. Md. Lutfur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ade hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 636. ......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Zilla Parishad, Faridpur.........Appellant Vs. Md. Lutfur Rahman and others ..........Respondents Judgment March 20, 2005. Lawyers Involved: ......ade hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 636. ...... seeking declaration that the 1 Memo. No.13/Sa dated 11.7.1993 issued by the defendant No.1 (herein appellant) is illegal, nul and void, in operative, without jurisdiction and not binding upon the plaintiff. 2. By the aforesaid Memo, the defendant No.1 cancelled the Memo bearing No. 126/6..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) Vs. Iqbal Ahmed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ackground of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 631. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin M.M. Ruhul Amin Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK)………Petitioner Vs. Iqbal Ahmed and others .........Respondents Judgment August 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: ......ackground of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 631. ......ellation of the lease deed made in favour of the defendant No.1 by the defendant No.2. 3. Facts, in short, are that land in suit was acquired by purchase by Md. Amanullah, predecessor of the plaintiffs, from the allottee of the RAJUK, that the transfer was made by the allottee upon obtain..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Mazu Bibi and others Vs. Rabeya Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 267; III ADC (2006) 702.......This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 267; III ADC (2006) 702.......e hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 267; III ADC (2006) 702.......and possessed by Zinder Sheikh and Harun Sheikh and in their names CS khatian was prepared, that Zinder Sheikh by amicable arrangement was enjoying 4.23 acres of land and he died leaving 2 sons, i.e. plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and a daughter plaintiff No.3, that at the time of death of Zinder Sheikh plai..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 171
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Megha Fisheries Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
...., as such, we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 97, 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 25. ......udgment July 4, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismissed Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the......, as such, we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 97, 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 25. ......inst the judgment and order dated 7-7-2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 456 of 2000 dismissing the appeal. 2. The facts leading to the appeal are that the appellant as the plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No.12 of 1996 for declaration that the registered lease deed N..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... could be pointed out for our interference. In view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 94. ......ion (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Badal Chandra Das and others.....................Appellants Vs. Amena Khatun……&h...... could be pointed out for our interference. In view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 94. ......, Rajshahi in Title Appeal No.130 of 1999 reversing those dated 28-2-1999 by the Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Rajshahi in Suit No. 265 of 1996 dismissing the suit. 2. The respondent as the plaintiff instituted the suit for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession in res..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abul Kashem Howlader & ors. Vs. Md. Kashem Ali Khan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ...... M.A. Aziz J Abul Kashem Howlader & ors……………………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Kashem Ali Khan and others.............Respondents Judgment February 16, 2005. Lawyers Involved......on 6-12-1958 as fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiffs. The petition is disposed of aforesaid modification. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 86. ...... Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1456 of 2001. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - The plaintiff seeks leave to appeal against the impugned judgment decree dated 9-5-2001 passed by the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Most. Bulbul Begum Vs. Mohammad Sanwar Belal and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....989 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now joint District Judge), Sadar, Chittagong, is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 83. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J Most. Bulbul Begum……………………….....Appellant Vs. Mohammad Sanwar Belal and another.........Respondents Judgment March 30, 2003. Cases Referred To- 40 DLR (AD) ......989 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now joint District Judge), Sadar, Chittagong, is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 83. ......(From the judgment and order dated December 2, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1056 of 1995). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - The present appeal, by leave, is by the plaintiff against the judgment and order dated December 2, 1997of a Single Bench of the High Court D..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ali Akber Ansari, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 76. ...... Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represent the Secretary, Ministry of Works and others…………....Appellants Vs. Ali Akber Ansari…&......ason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 76. ......of the Code of civil Procedure the Civil Courts have jurisdiction to try all suits of civil nature excepting suits the cognizance of which is either expressly or impliedly barred by any law but the plaintiff must show his locus standi to file such a suit. In the instant case, in our view the appe..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Vs. Shamirunnessa Bibi, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division is set aside and those of the appellate court passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 45 of 1993 are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 71. ......-1(a) Hasan Ali Matbar & others ….........Respondents Judgment June 29, 2005. Cases Referred To- Director of Housing & Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader and others, 9 MLR(AD) 73; Gannysons Ltd. Vs. Sonali Bank, 37 DLR (AD) 42, AFM Naziruddin Vs. Hameed......ourt Division is set aside and those of the appellate court passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 45 of 1993 are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 71. ......er dated 20.05.2002 passed by the Court Division rejecting the review application summarily, filed seeking review of the judgment in the civil revision. The revisional application was filed by the plaintiff against the judgment and order dated 24.05.1993 of 6th Court of Additional District Judge..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
28142813281128082807280628052804280328022800279527942790278127802778277527742773