Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2101-2109 of 2109 results.
Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ...... favour of the Company by the letter dated 18.06.1990. The appellant filed a review petition on 21.07.1990 before the concerned Minister and it was considered and the respondent No. 3 the Deputy Commissioner, Cox's Bazar was given direction on 15.12.1991 (Annexure-D) for effecting long term..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.T.M. Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J A.M. Mahmudur Rahman J Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Dhaka and Assistant Custodian Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......#39;s title in the suit land. These facts are not disputed. The trial Court in the judgment of Title Suit No. 90 of 1986 stated that there was local investigation of the suit land by an Advocate Commissioner to ascertain the exact location of the suit land and the Advocate Commissioner in prese..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 1005 of 1984 for declaration of title in the first schedule land measuring 0.70 acres. The appellant and the Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Naogaon were impleaded as defendant and proforma defendant respectively. The case..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... 13. It is to be mentioned here that in this case the conduct of the investigating agency is not fair. It appears that as many as four Investigating Officers including one Assistant Police Commissioner were engaged in this case. 14. We have noticed that there is no explanatio..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. Kamal Uddin.........................Petitioner. Vs. The State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Comilla….......Respondent. Judgment 12 December 2005 Lawye..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......an, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J. Md. Hamidul Haque, J.Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abul Kalam Azad.....................Petitioner. Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others........Respondents. Judgment 8 November 2003 Lawyer..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......claration that as per judgment dated 24.6.1996 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in AAT Appeal No.181 of 1995, the appellant is entitled to get anti-dated seniority and promotions as Assistant Commissioner of Taxes with effect from 5.8.1974 and as Deputy Commissioner of Taxes with effect fr..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......Hosne Ara Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 50 DLR (AD) 11, Nur Mohammad and others Vs. Moulvi Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 39 DLR (AD) 1, Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others Vs. Basharatullah, being dead his heirs and successors: Fazle Karim a..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
375370369368354332326307303