Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2121-2140 of 2867 results.
Giasuddin Chowdhury & anr Vs. Military Estate Officer, Central Circle, Dhk, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ved: Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioners. Munsur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 109 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2007 ......any cogent reason to differ with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 248. ......eal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1810 of 2005 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 324 of 1999 in the Court of Assistant Judge, 2nd Additional C..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Harunullah Akhand Vs. Abdul Latif & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....espondents Judgment November 5, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-an-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1150 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 26.06.2005 passed ......rect decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 243. ...... against the judgment and order dated 26.06.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3214 of 1997 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.76 of 1992 in the Court of Additional Assistant Judge, 1st ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Mojibar Matubbar and others Vs. Abdul Hamid Matubbar, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... 2. The respondent Nos.1-4 and their predecessor-in-interest as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 341 of 1982 in the Court of Munsif, Shariatpur for declaration of title and confirmation of possession in the suit land. The case of the plaintiff......fers legal infirmity and is liable to be set aside. The appeal is therefore allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 238. ...... No. 341 of 1982 decreeing the suit. 2. The respondent Nos.1-4 and their predecessor-in-interest as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 341 of 1982 in the Court of Munsif, Shariatpur for declaration of ti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Raghunath Sarker Vs. Ramnath Sarker, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....l District Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka, in Title Appeal No. 333 of 1999 reversing those dated 31.05.1999 of the Assistant Judge, Savar Thana, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 181 of 1996 and remanding the suit for re-trial. 2. The appellant filed the suit for declaring that the 'Kha' schedule deed ap......are of the opinion that the appeal has got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 232. ......nbsp; Md. Hossan Ameen J. - This appeal, by way of leave, at the instance of the plaintiff, is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.5.2001 passed by the High Court Divi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Shahabuddin and others Vs. Mahtab Uddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 812 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 05.03.2005 passed b......correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 229. ......st the Judgment and order dated 05.03.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3195 of 1998 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 269 of 1966 in the Court of Munsif(now Assistant Judge), Borol..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Ranju Roy and other Vs. Jibesh Ranjan Roy and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....sp; Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 545 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 24.1. 2006 passed b......r infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 223. ......ee sons namely Mukunda, Bipin and Manindra and after the death of Mukunda and Bipin the entire property devolved up Manindra; in the year 1972 Manindra who was ailing due to his old age brought the plaintiff to his own house and since then the plaintiff had been residing with Manindra; Mani..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Rob and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.6.1997 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.79 of 1990 allowing the application filed by the plaintiff for amendment of the plaint and then sending back the suit on remand to the trial court for fresh h...... This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.6.1997 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.79 of 1990 allowing the application filed by the plaintiff for amendment of the plaint and then sending back the suit on remand to the trial court for fresh heari......zul Islam J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.6.1997 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.79 of 1990 allowing the application filed by the plaintiff for amendment of the plaint and then sending back the suit on remand to the trial court f..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Mst. Sufia Khanam Mst. @ Sufia Khatun & another Vs. Md. Abdul Rouf @ Tara Miah, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Abdul Plaque, Advocate instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner (Appeared with the leave of the Court). Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 182 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2005 passed b......ecord arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 217. ......e to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.12.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2716 of 2001 making the Rule absolute. 2. The plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No.6 of 1998 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Muktagacha, Mym..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Md. Amzad Hossain alias Khoka Vs. Dr. A.K.M. Mobarak Hossain, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
...., instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Firoz Shah, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos.1, 3-8. Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 2, 9-12. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1094 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 24.04.2006 passed by the ...... on record arrived at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 212. ...... directed against the judgment and order dated 24.04.2006 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2149 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 2. The short fact is that the plaintiff-respondent Nos.1-8 instituted Other Class Suit No. 56 of 1993 in the court of the Assista..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Abu Yousuf and others Vs. Md. Hanif, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nstructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. A.K.M. Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1423 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 16.5.2007 passed by the ......orrect decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 209, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 413. ......cree dated 20.7.2003 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Chatkhil, Noakhali, in title Suit No.13 of 2002 decreeing the suit for permanent injunction. 2. The Short fact is that the respondent as plaintiff instituted the aforesaid Title Suit No.13 of 2002 against the defendant-petitioners for ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Jahanara Begum Vs. Badura Begum and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment September 16, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 792 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 25 day of May, ......n the submissions of the learned Advocate-on-Record for our interference. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 197. ......; 2. The predecessor of opposite party Nos.1 to 4 as plaintiffs filed a Other Class Suit No.19 of 1988 in the Court of the Assistant Judge, Hathazari, C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Afazuddin Mollah and others Vs. Sadhan Chandra Roy, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....wyers Involved: A. K. M. Shafiqul Alam, Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Mahmuda Begum, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. None represented-For Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 604 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 10.03.2004 passed b......ubstances in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 193. ......Title Appeal No. 132 of 1999 by the Additional District Judge, Magura reversing those dated 20.06.1999 in Title Suit No.7 of 1985 dismissing the suit by the Subordinate Judge, Magura. 2. The plaint case is that the suit land originally belonged to Fazal Sheikh and others and District ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Mahadeb Chandra Mondal and other Vs. Rebati Sarder and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioners. S. R. Khoshnabish, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 5. None represented- For Respondent Nos. 1-4, 6-16. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 245 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated the 28th November, ...... substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 186. ......o.244 of 1966 and the order dated 23.12.1970 passed by Assistant Commissioner (Revenue) in Miscellaneous Case No. 180 of 1971 to the fraudulent, forged, collusive, illegal and not binding upon the plaintiff contending, inter-alia, that the land of District Settlement Khatian No. 82 of mouza Boya..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
K.K.K. Garments Limited Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Limited and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. None Represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-3 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.723 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated the 27th March, 2005......erit in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 181. ......People's Republic of Bangladesh is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 121 of 2000 allowing the appeal. 2. The plaintiff-respondents instituted Title Suit No. 239 of 1997 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Arth..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Md. Ataur Rahman & others Vs. B. M. Muhibur Rahman & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ereby declaring the impugned Notification Gm,Avi, I bs 250-AvBb/2006 mg (wewa-5)-15/2002 dated 11.10.2006 as of no legal effect being unconstitutional. 2. The respondent Nos.1-6 filed the aforesaid writ petition No.10238 of 2006 challenging the vires of the impugned No......In this background of the matter, the President in exercise of his power conferred under Article 133 of the Constitution and in consultation with the Public Service Commission brought about an amendment to the Bangladesh Civil Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1981 by adding Rule 8(1) (dd) after ......ppeal. Both the appeals are accordingly owed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 111; 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 62; 29 BLD (AD) 2009, 15. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Abdur Rashid Bepari Vs. Soleman Ali, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... A. Y. Mosihuzzaman, Advocate instructed by Mr. Md. Nawab Ali, advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1589 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 14.05.2006 passed b......d any illegality or error of law so as to warrant interference by this court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 139. ......and decree dated 28.09.1995 passed in Other Appeal No.75 of 1994 upholding the judgment and decree dated 26.06.1994 passed in Other Suit No. 44 of 1994. 2. The facts, in short, are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed the aforesaid Other Suit No.44 of 1994 against the defendant-opposite pa..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Elahi Mondal Vs. Juran Mondal and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 697 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 25.1.2007 passed b...... there being no illegality or infirmity in the above decision no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 135. ...... 1999 affirming those of dated 25.8.1999 of the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Jhenidah in Title Suit No.62 of 1988 decreeing the suit. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the respondent No.1, as plaintiff, filed the above suit seeking declaration of his title in the land as described Ka schedu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Tazimuddin and others Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....e Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No. 122 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 29.05.2008 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1642 of 2007. Judgment &nb......e plaintiff from 0.11 acres of land out of .38 decimals from the western side of plot No.1609 on 21.01.1996 forcibly where they made pucca construction and (which fact was asserted in the amendment of the plaint after the remand) so the plaintiff also prayed for a decree for recovery of......it No. 20 of 1989 in the Court of the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Mithapukur, Rangpur for partition and for recovery of khas possession in respect of the portion of the suit land. 3. The plaint case is that the land measuring 2.27 acres comprising Khatian No. 479(Hal) belonged t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Abdul Quddus Matabbar Vs. Yousuf Ali Bayati and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on No.3194 of 1991 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.59 of 1983 in the Court of Subordinate Judge (now joint District Judge), Barguna for declaration of title to the suit land measuring 10.47 acres out of 13.14 acres of land stating,......regarding the findings of the court of appeal on question of fact. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with, costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 45. ......d against the judgment and order dated 23.03.1999 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3194 of 1991 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.59 of 1983 in the Court of Subordinate Judge (now joint Distric..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Gazi Rafiqul Islam @ Manzu Vs. Mosharaf Hossain & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment September 10, 2007. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M.Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 131 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 13.07.2005 passed by......ocate-on-Record could not point out any other legal infirmity in the impugned judgment. The Petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 24. ......leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.07.2005 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1162 of 2002 discharging the Rule. 2. The plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.77 of 1991 in the Court of Assistant Judge, 4th Additional Cour..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
30053003300129992998299629952994299229912988298729852984297929642963295729432942