Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Mir Niaz Mohammad Vs. Additional District Judge and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....iving rise to a disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division (II) the law is now well settled that since there being special provision for appeal in the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 no application under Article 102 of the Constitution lies against the Jud......rise to a disputed question of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division (II) the law is now well settled that since there being special provision for appeal in the Artha Rin Adalat Act, 1990 no application under Article 102 of the Constitution lies against the Judgment ......y order as to costs. The order of stay granted at the time of issuance of the Rule stands vacated. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 108. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 145
Sonali Bank Limited Vs. Syed Shakhawat Hossain and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....h is still pending. Besides, in order to realize the outstanding loan of Taka 8,21,19,720 (eight crores twenty one lakh nineteen thousand and seven hundred twenty), the Bank had filed, in the first Artha Rin Court, Dhaka, Artha Rin Suit No.310/2003 in which the Artha Rin Court passed Judgment and ......till pending. Besides, in order to realize the outstanding loan of Taka 8,21,19,720 (eight crores twenty one lakh nineteen thousand and seven hundred twenty), the Bank had filed, in the first Artha Rin Court, Dhaka, Artha Rin Suit No.310/2003 in which the Artha Rin Court passed Judgment and decree......e, preferably within 60 (sixty) working days of receiving the Judgment and Order of this Division. Communicate the orders at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 22. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 212
AKM Tofazzel Hossain and others Vs. Rupali Bank Limited and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
..... Writ Petition No.5376 of 2007. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi, the petitioners challenged the legality of the order No.12 dated 27-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Jari Case No.74 of 2003 imposing 6 months Civil detention of t......; Writ Petition No.5376 of 2007. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi, the petitioners challenged the legality of the order No.12 dated 27-2-2005 passed by the learned Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Artha Jari Case No.74 of 2003 imposing 6 months Civil detention of the pet......Ain is to be followed before taking action under section 34 (1) of the Ain. Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 435. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Setara Begum Vs. Al-Arafah Islami Bank Ltd. and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 24-8-2006 (Annexure-E to the writ petition) passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006, conferring title of petitioner'...... the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 24-8-2006 (Annexure-E to the writ petition) passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Artha Execution Case No.60 of 2006, conferring title of petitioner's mort......ccordance with law. Office is directed to communicate the order at once with a copy of judgment of information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (HCD) (2009) 791. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Nawabgonj Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....91(3) dated 2-10-1989, passed by the respondent No.4 and subsequently making it rule/ decree of the Court and the proceedings of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998, now pending in the First Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Nawabganj (Annexure-H), should not be declared to have been made without any lawfu......dated 2-10-1989, passed by the respondent No.4 and subsequently making it rule/ decree of the Court and the proceedings of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998, now pending in the First Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Nawabganj (Annexure-H), should not be declared to have been made without any lawful auth......down the record of Money Execution Case No.4 of 1998 to the concerned Court at once, and the same will proceed in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 46. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Sultana Jute Mills Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....ers and it has been also circulated to all banks behind the back and knowledge of the petitioners. The respondent No.3 bank instituted Mortgage Suit No.21 of1990 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin AdalatNo.1,Chittagong, claiming an amount of Tk. 8,89,94,800.22/-against the petitioners a......d it has been also circulated to all banks behind the back and knowledge of the petitioners. The respondent No.3 bank instituted Mortgage Suit No.21 of1990 in the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin AdalatNo.1,Chittagong, claiming an amount of Tk. 8,89,94,800.22/-against the petitioners and oth......is discharged without any order as to cost. The order of stay granted at the time of issuance of Rule on 3.12.2000 is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 434. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Md. Sazzad Hossain Vs. M/S. Kaderia Publication and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.271 vacating the order dated 04.02.2002 by allowing t......section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.271 vacating the order dated 04.02.2002 by allowing the pla......f this court to the learned Joint District Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 170. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Osarunnessa Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....l Islam J.- At the instance of the petitioner Osarunnessa, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.17 dated 25-01-2011 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annex......m J.- At the instance of the petitioner Osarunnessa, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No.17 dated 25-01-2011 passed by the learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Artha Execution Case No.195 of 2007 issuing warrant of arrest (Annexure-B)......ared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and hereby set aside. Communicate this order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 417. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Dr. M. Rafiquzzaman Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....3,01,85,650/=. The respondent bank proceeded under Section 33 of the Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Order 1972 (President's Order No.129 of 1972) and filed Misc. Case before the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat on 1.8.1992. The learned Joint District Judge Artha Rin Adalat registered it as Mis......desh Shilpa Bank and others, 42 DLR (AD) 221, 18 BLD (AD) 124, 18 BLD (AD) 136; Jahanara Akhter Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 47 DLR (HCD) 158; Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sanstha Vs. Azir Uddin, 51 DLR (AD) 1996. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Mannan with Subrata Chowd......k any adjournment. The order of stay is vacated and the connected civil rule is discharged. Let the L.C.R be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 18. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Rashida Mahabub Vs. IFIC Bank & others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No.711 of 2004. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi the petitioner challenged the legality of the orders dated 12-8-2003 and 8-2-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.123 of 2002. 2. Material facts relevant f......ndent No.1. Writ Petition No.711 of 2004. Judgment Zinat Ara J.- In this Rule Nisi the petitioner challenged the legality of the orders dated 12-8-2003 and 8-2-2004 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.123 of 2002. 2. Material facts relevant for dis......ith the execution case in accordance with law. The order of stay stands vacated. Communicate the Judgment to the Adalat at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 78. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 136
M. A. Jaher and others Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....o.1-2. Writ Petition No.6067 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J.- This rule has arisen out of order No.49 dated 16.6.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the writ petitioners passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Bhola in Artha Rin Execution Case No.6 of 2001. 2. The facts relevant for ...... Writ Petition No.6067 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abu Tariq J.- This rule has arisen out of order No.49 dated 16.6.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the writ petitioners passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Bhola in Artha Rin Execution Case No.6 of 2001. 2. The facts relevant for dispos...... surrender before the Artha Rin Adalat concerned within 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment by that Adalat. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 283. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ragib Hasan Khan @ Munu Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ly hanged the sign board "Munu Shoe Museum" instead of "New shoe Museum" with a view to misappropriate the loan money; that for realization of money, the complainant bank filed a suit in the court of Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna being Money Suit No.92 of 1997 against the accused No.1 and accused No.2 and......ged the sign board "Munu Shoe Museum" instead of "New shoe Museum" with a view to misappropriate the loan money; that for realization of money, the complainant bank filed a suit in the court of Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna being Money Suit No.92 of 1997 against the accused No.1 and accused No.2 and that ......itled to get any relief as prayed for. Hence the rule fails. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Order of stay stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 353. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Contech Ltd. and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....is directed to dispose of the suit within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order in the interest of all the parties. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 133. ......arketing Company Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the SMC') vide their letter dated 14.12.1998, would be made directly by the Siemens to the bank, the appellant. The defence taken by the respondent in Artho Rin Case is more or less is the case as made out by the respondent in Title Suit No.227 of 2004. The......is directed to dispose of the suit within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order in the interest of all the parties. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 133. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....ial Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. ......iginal Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury Mohammad Ullah J Dr. S.M. Eunus Ali………………………………………Petitioner (Defendant-Judgment Debtor) Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment December 3, 2012. Res......as to cost. The stay order stands vacated. Send copy of this judgment to the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Jessore. Nozrul Islam Chowdhury J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 254
Gopinath Das and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....short) but ultimately did not file any. Finally, the petitioners got a compromise decree on 28-11-99. The decree was put to execution in Execution Case No.31(G)/2000 in the Court of Subordinate Judge Artha Rin Adalat, 3, Dhaka. Summons of the execution case was duly served upon the defendant Nos.1...... but ultimately did not file any. Finally, the petitioners got a compromise decree on 28-11-99. The decree was put to execution in Execution Case No.31(G)/2000 in the Court of Subordinate Judge Artha Rin Adalat, 3, Dhaka. Summons of the execution case was duly served upon the defendant Nos.1 and 2......of the giant design to grab, if at all, such a huge tract of land in the city centre. Communicate a copy of the Judgment at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 167. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Hubble Corporate Ltd. Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....preme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafor Siddique J Hubble Corporate Ltd………………………Petitioners Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & others………………………………..Respondents Judgment August......Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafor Siddique J Hubble Corporate Ltd………………………Petitioners Vs. Artha Rin Adalat & others………………………………..Respondents Judgment August 4, 20...... of stay granted earlier by the Court stands vacated. No order as to costs. Communicate the Judgment to respondent No.1 at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 91. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 176