Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2181-2200 of 3391 results.
....vil Revisional Jurisdiction)bes
Present:
Md. Abdur Rashid J
Syed Mahmud Hossain J
Bangladesh Shipping Lines Ltd………………..Petitioner
Vs.
Commissioner of Customs, Chittagong and others.............Opposite Parties
Judgment
July 21, 2002.
Cases Referred To-
Mal......€‘1‑99 the plaintiff instituted the suit for a decree of several declarations, namely, issue of adjudication orders as described in schedule-A to the plaint against the plaintiff are all illegal, improper and no legal effect, that the joint declaration dated 1‑8‑91 executed in between the plai..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Sherajul Huq Mullick Vs. Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....s Republic of BanglaÂdesh, Through Secretary, MinÂistry of Local Govt. & Rural Development & others........Respondents Judgment December 5, 1988. Lawyers Involved: Amirul Islam and A. Razzaq, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Kazi A.T. Manowaruddin and Shirin Nahar, AdÂvocat......the election results in official forms. The petitioner relies upon Annexure C l and therefore from the petitioner's own documents it is clearly established that polls at centres (b) and (c) were held properly and that results were also duly deÂclared. So there is no case for interference as far ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Shahabuddin Vs. Janata Bank, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... Judgment November 30, 1988. Cases Referred to- Asstt. Gen. Manager, Rupali Bank, Barisal & ors. Vs. Nurul Islam Miah, 39 DLR 167, the Managing Director, Janata Bank Vs. Hafijuddin Ahmed and others, 29 DLR (S.C.) 39, the State vs. Abdul Awal, 35 DLR 151, the Senior Manager, Dosta Textil......ion of delegation of authority by the competent authority to the subordinate authority in terminating the plaintiffs' services, and in Title Appeal No. 142 of 1986 has raised a new question as to the proper forum of the suit (Title Suit No. 188 of 1985) being the Administrative Tribunal. According t..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Angur Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....West Bengal, AIR 1959 (S.C.) 13, Ali Vs. Emperor, AIR 1925 Lahore 15, Chanan Singh Vs. Emperor, AIR 1920 LaÂhore 376, Soliyan Vs. Emperor, 1930 M.W.N. 773, Aziz Vs. State PLD 1969 Lahore 1071, Dip Chand Vs. Emperor AIR 1935 Lahore 799, Emperor vs. Probhu AIR 1937 Lahore 551, Emperor vs. Mathwia, AI...... appellant and was accepted by him before commencement of the trial with other accused persons, the appellant cannot be prosecuted for breaking the condition of his parÂdon without the necessary and proper certificate of the Public Prosecutor and without prior sanction for prosecution from the High..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Abdul Mukit Chowdhury Vs. The Chief Election ComÂmissioner & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....School Station for the election of Chairman of No. 1 Ali Nagar Union Parishad within Upazila Beani Bazar, District Sylhet or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner's case in short is that he along with respondent Nos. 5-8 contested......ol Station for the election of Chairman of No. 1 Ali Nagar Union Parishad within Upazila Beani Bazar, District Sylhet or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner's case in short is that he along with respondent Nos. 5-8 contested the..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Haji Noor Nabi Mollah Vs. Ahammad Ali and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....nt: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Abdul Matin J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Haji Noor Nabi Mollah being dead his legal heirs Haji Amir Jan Begum and others……....Petitioners Vs. Ahammad Ali and others ...........Respondents Judgment...... as "Badda Meftahul Ulum Madrasha" being EC. No.17260 which is the Waqf lillah, contending, inter-alia, that the defendant No. 5 in collusion with the defendant No.1 have been trying to grab the waqf property illegally and also filed an application for appointment for receiver in the aforesaid waqf ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Altaf Hossain and others Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 464.......for the accused appellants, submits that the learned Assistant Sessions Judge was manifestly wrong in convicting and sentencing the accused appellants under sections 386/387 of the Penal Code without properly weighing and sifting he evidence on record and the same has occasioned failure of justice. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: ABM Khairul Haque J KM Khaled J Pubali Bank Ltd………….……………….. Appellant Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another………. Respondents Judgment December 9, 2001. Case Referred To- Sulta......r dated 16-1-1985 a loan of Taka 8,00,000 was allowed in favour of M/s. Sygal Brothers. He proved the sanction letter dated 16-1-1985 (Exhibit 1). He also stated that Md. Mamunur Rahman mortgaged his properties mentioned in the second Schedule to the plaint in favour of the bank. Besides, he proved ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Sarwar Garments Ltd. Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....sion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J AKM Shafiuddin J Sarwar Garments Ltd…………………….Petitioner Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and ors………………. Respondents Judgment August 13 and 14, 2001. Lawyers Involved: ......n the documents submitted by the petitioner Company or whether any illegality or irregularity has been committed the petitioner will be determined in adjudication but in the instant case, without any proper adjudication at the investigation stage the respondents had taken shelter of section 13(3) of..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Mustafa Kabir Uddin Ahmed Vs. Badrun Nessa Chowdhury, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....med……………………Petitioner Vs. Badrun Nessa Chowdhury……………..Opposite Party Judgment April 3, 2002. Case Referred To- AZM Khalilur Rahman vs. Md. Syed Hossain and ors 25 DLR 485; AIR 1934 All, 450. Lawyers Involved: Samarendra Nath Goswami, Advocate—......sed in Title Appeal No. 192 of 1993 by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka shall not be set aside or such order or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The short facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this Rule is that plaintiff-pe..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Osi Meah Sowdager Vs. Tulsidham Akherar Madan Mahan Narasingha and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....09.......oral and documentary, and the law bearing on the subject and passed the impugned judgment with reference to the material evidence on record. The learned District Judge, as the final Court of fact, on proper assessment of the evidence on record, clearly found that the plaintiff has title in the suit ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Makbul Ahmed and others Vs. Mohammedullah and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 399....... 13/83 stood dismissed on 16-9-84. It has been contended that the trial Court should have corrected its own mistake under section 151 of the CPC as it is evident from the order dated 14-7-84 that the proper information to the petitioners as to the arrival of the case record was not made in accordanc..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Abdul Mannan Miah Vs. Md. Salaiman Miah, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... …….Respondent Judgment December 13, 2000. Cases Referred To- 48 DLR 28; 50 DLR 548; 1987 BLD (AD) 130; 28DLR 1171; Abdul Jabbar vs. Ahmed Jan PLD 1973 Karachi 289; Burneys Industrial and Commercial Co. Ltd vs. Rahman Match Works PLD 1983 Karachi 357; Flowerdale vs. Hale Electric (19......ts but the Supreme Court held that since the court was examining the correctness of the decision of trial Court on the basis of document which had been produced before the said court, it would not be proper to advert to any new document, and the Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the ground tha..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 200
Zakir Hossain and another Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 137.......he appellants submits that occurrence as per first information report took place at 4‑00 PM on 28‑9‑89 but first information report was lodged at 12 hours on 29‑9-Â89 and above delay was not properly explained by prosecution although thana was only 12 miles off from the place of occurrence ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Hajee Abul Hossain and others Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Hajee Abul Hossain and others...............................Appellants Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain and others................ion purportedly made by four brothers of Harnendra Kumar Majumder who resided in Calcutta before the Pakistan High Commission at Calcutta that there was an amicable partition among them by which, the property at Feni, Bangladesh fell in the share of Hamendra. This photostat copy was admitted into ev..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abul Kashem and others Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 132.......eputy Attorney-General that since this point was not agitated and argued at the trial, the defence is now estopped and debarred from agitating this point at this belated stage. 10. For the sake of proper appreciation of the points raised we intend to discuss the evidence as under: PW 1, Monowara ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
State Vs. Mir Hossain alias Mira and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State……………………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Mir Hossain alias Mira and others……….Condemned Prisoners Judgment December 9, 2003. Case Referred To- Ba......hah Alam and went to her father informant PW 1 Abdul Gafur's house three/four months after second marriage with accused Khodeja Begum. In view of arbitration accused Shah Alam transferred some of his property to deceased Rokeya Begurn by way of registered deed of conveyance and took back deceased Ro..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Serajul Islam Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. Bangladesh Water Development Board & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: TH Khan with Md. Oziullah, Advocates‑For the Petitioner. Md. Hefzul Bari with Shamsunnahar Bari, Advocates‑For Respondent Nos. 1‑5. Tufailur Rahman with Sufia Ahmed and AKM Mohiuddin Chowdhury, Advocates-For Respondent No. 6. Writ Petition No. 7377 of 2002. J...... 9‑11‑2002 and in case of modifying any order of transfer, no reason is to be assigned. The respondent No.6, further stated that he joined Khagrachari O & M Division on 19‑11‑2000 and for proper execution of the development work, his continuous stay in the place of posting was considered..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Ekushey Television Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ead the Judgment of Appellate Division here. Supreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: MA Wahhab Miah J Shamim Hasnain J Ekushey Television Ltd. and another............... Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ............................R......Ekushey Television Limited required to broadcast its programmes through a satellite channel without any hindrance and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this court may seem fit and proper. 3. In this petition it has been stated, inter alia, that Ekushey Television Ltd. shortly,..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 230
Arif Iftekhar Ali and others Vs. Sekandar Ali Hawlader, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....is Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 82. ......XXIX rule 7 reads- "7. (1) The Court may, on the application of any party to a suit, and on such terms at it thinks fit‑ (a) make an order for the detention' preservation or inspection of any property which is the subject matter of such suit, or as to which any question may arise therein; ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
43134296429542914289428242774276426742654263426042594252425042424241424042394236