Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 2261-2280 of 3679 results.

Mohshinul Islam Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....dated 18-10-92 (Annexure-F) shall not be declared to have been made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and the respondents were directed not to change the nature and character of the lands earmarked in the original master plan (possibly meant layout plan) for community purpose, recr......que J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Mohshinul Islam………………………….Petitioner Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and others………..Respondents Judgment June 9, 1999. Cases Referred To- Giasuddin vs. Dhaka Municipal Corporations 17 BLD 577=49 DLR 199; Miah Fazal Di......9; Miah Fazal Din vs. Lahore Improvement Trust 21 DLR (SC) 225 (13 & 14). Lawyers Involved: GS Huq with Syed Haider Ali, Advocates-For the Petitioner. AF Hassan Ariff with Ziaur Rahman Khatian, Ashik Ali Jalil, Advocates—For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Writ Petition No.1001 of 199......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioner Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and others………..Respondents Judgment June 9, 1999. Cases Referred To- Giasuddin vs. Dhaka Municipal Corporations 17 BLD 577=49 DLR 199; Miah Fazal Din vs. Lahore Improvement Trust 21 DLR (SC) 225 (13 &..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55

Shah Alam Patwari (Md) Vs. Md. Siddiqur Rahman Bhuiyan and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....f status quo granted at the time of issue of the above Rule on 24-06-2001 is hereby recalled and vacated. Communicate this order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (2001) 390. ......ated. Communicate this order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (2001) 390. ...... and the Rule was also discharged. So, the order of recount stood confirmed. 6. Thereafter, the Election Tribunal on 30-04-2000 recounted the votes. After the recount, the Election Tribunal found that 3021 votes in total were cast in those four centers and out of those votes, 309 votes were inval......ar Halder and others, 52 DLR (AD) 20; Nur Hossain Vs. Election Tribunal, Cox’s Bazar, 27 DLR (AD) 117. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein with Md. lqbal Malik and Mozammel Hoque, Advocates — For the Petitioner. Shafique Ahmed with Kazi Kamrul Alam, Advocates— For the Opposite Party No.1..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 79

North South Property Development Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....) should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Case of the petitioner is that the respondent No.1 decided to undertake a project to develop 47.90 acres of land in Bhasantek area under Dhaka in Cantonment PS for rehabilitation and housing of slum dwellers ......zammel Hossain J North South Property Development Ltd……………...Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and another……………….Respondents Judgment May 17, 1999. Cases Referred To- Hong Kong vs NG Yuen Shin (1983) 2 AC629; RV Devon County Council, (1995) 1 Al......on the respondents to show cause as to why notification dated 9-10-98 (Annexure-K) should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Case of the petitioner is that the respondent No.1 decided to undertake a project to develop 47.90 acres of land in Bhasantek a...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 7...

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92

Narayan Chandra Saha and another Vs. Jatindra Chandra Saha and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....d Munsif at Brahmanbaria by the petitioner as plaintiff for a declaration that the notice dated 06-02-82 issued by the vested property authorities asking him to surrender the possession of schedule-B land is illegal, without any lawful authority and not binding on him. The suit was contested by oppo......and disposed of as early as possible. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 5....... as pro forma defendants No. 6 and 7 in suit. 2. The suit being Title Suit No.22 of 1982 was instituted in the court of 2nd Munsif at Brahmanbaria by the petitioner as plaintiff for a declaration that the notice dated 06-02-82 issued by the vested property authorities asking him to surrender the ......others………………..Opposite Parties Judgment October 28, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Promila Biswas with Ms Nahid Sultana, Advocates—the Petitioners. M Shamsul Alam, Advocate—For the Opposite Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 2252 of 1998. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 66

Abdur Rashid alias Abdur Rasheed Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chittagong, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

..... We find that the High Court Division committed no illegality in discharging the Rule. Accordingly the leave petition is dis­missed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 611.......11.......No.60 dated 19.07.2004 issuing warrant of arrest against the petitioner in Money Execution Case No. 196 of 2003 passed by the Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chittagong. 2. The facts, in short, are that the petition­er filed the writ petition being Writ peti­tion No. 5765 of 2004 before the High ......, District-Chittagong and Another…….........Respondents Judgment November 16, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Mamunur Rashid, Advocate instructed by Syed M. Rahman, Advocate-on-Record..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77

Md. Alimuddin and others Vs. Alhaj Md. Abu Daud, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....i­tioners appeared before the trial court and contested the suit by filing written state­ment. 3. The plaintiff’s case, in brief, is that Kefatullah and Esamuddin were the own­ers of the suit land including other lands. By amicable partition Esamuddin and Kefatullah got 1.32½ acres of land ....... M. Khalekuzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.2085 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 16.04.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4896 of 2007.) Judgment Md. Abdul Matin......d affirming the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2004 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, 1st Court, Gazipur in Title Suit No. 230 of 2001 decreeing the suit. 2. The facts, in short, are that the respon­dent as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 230 of 2001 against the petitioners as defend......hers………………………Petitioners Vs. Alhaj Md. Abu Daud………….........Respondent Judgment January 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved: A. S. M. Khalekuzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36

Amal Chandra Dhupi @ Das and others Vs. Lakshan Chandra Das and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

.... those dated 31st July, 2002 of the learned Assistant Judge, Betagi in Title Suit No.63 of 1999. 2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 instituted the above suit seeking declaration of title of 2.385 acres of land appertaining to S.A. khatian Nos. 635 and 629, correspon­ding to R.S. khatian Nos. 31 and 418 ...... VII ADC (2010) 605.......2 of the learned Assistant Judge, Betagi in Title Suit No.63 of 1999. 2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 instituted the above suit seeking declaration of title of 2.385 acres of land appertaining to S.A. khatian Nos. 635 and 629, correspon­ding to R.S. khatian Nos. 31 and 418 of mouja Kaunia respectivel...... @ Das and others……..………..Petitioners Vs. Lakshan Chandra Das and others......................Respondents Order January 4, 2010. Lawyers Involved: M. M. Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Mrs. Mahmud..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27

Md. Helal Uddin and others Vs. M. A. Jakir and another, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....azipur in Miscellaneous Case No.9 of 1998. 2. The respondents instituted Miscellaneous Case No.9 of 1998 in the 1st Court of the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Gazipur for pre-emption of the case land claiming as co-sharers. The case of the pre-emptors, in short, is that the land in question app......ahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos.1-2. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 3-9. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1620 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 4.6.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5031 of 2006.) Judgment Surendra Kumar ......at the instance of the pre-emptee-petitioner is directed against the judgment and order dated 4th June, 2009, of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5031 of 2006 affirming that dated 22nd August, 2006, of the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Gazipur in Miscell......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioners Vs. M. A. Jakir and another………..........................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2010. Lawyers Involved: AFM Mesbahuddin, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. A. K. Badru..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22

Md. Ahia Vs. Md. Azimuddin and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....llowed the appeal by judgment and decree dated 09.10.2005 by setting aside the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial court. 3. The case of the plaintiff petitioner, in short, is that the suit land measuring about 23.50 decimals with other lands of total area 71 decimals situated within mouza......n-Record-For the Petitioner. A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 325 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 15.04.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.477 of 2006.) Judgment Md. Abdul Matin......peal and reversing those dated 09.10.2001 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Meherpur in Title Suit No. 3 of 1999 decree­ing the suit on contest. 2. The facts, in short, are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted a suit for specific per­formance of contract on 06.09.19...... Vs. Md. Azimuddin and others……..........Respondents Judgment March 21, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Asad Hossain Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil P..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25

Md. Mafiz and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

.... local administration forcibly close down Nutan Bazar with a view to start K.D.D.B. new market and accordingly, the plaintiffs with the permission of K.D.D.B. construct­ed and erected shops over the land of K.D.D.B. hereby the bank of Patuakhali river with their own expenses; that the plaintiffs as......n, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 54 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated the 16th day of June, 2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2102 of 1995). Order Mohammad Fazlul K......making the Rule absolute remanding the suit to the Court of Appeal below for holding fresh trial in the light of observation made in the judgment. 2. The facts involved in the case, in short, are that Patuakhali Thana premises P.D.S. Maidan and also to the north of District Council Road and the p......d by the Deputy Commissioner of Patuakhali, Police Station and District-Patuakhali and others…………......Respondents Order January 17, 2010. Lawyers Involved: A. K. Badrul Huq, Senior Advocate instruct­ed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not rep..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31

Alekjan Bewa and others Vs. Arefa Bewa and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....arned Additional District Judge affirmed with modification of those of the Courts below. 2. The predecessor of the petitioners insti­tuted the suit for partition claiming a saham of 1.50 acres of land. The plaint case in short is that Habi Mondal and Halim Mondal were the owners of schedule 1 an......istrict Judge affirmed with modification of those of the Courts below. 2. The predecessor of the petitioners insti­tuted the suit for partition claiming a saham of 1.50 acres of land. The plaint case in short is that Habi Mondal and Halim Mondal were the owners of schedule 1 and 2 lands respecti......irmed with modification of those of the Courts below. 2. The predecessor of the petitioners insti­tuted the suit for partition claiming a saham of 1.50 acres of land. The plaint case in short is that Habi Mondal and Halim Mondal were the owners of schedule 1 and 2 lands respectively. Habi Mondal......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦....Petitioners Vs. Arefa Bewa and others…………………….........Respondents Judgment December 14, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mazibar Rahman, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23

Joynal Abedin Vs. Ali Azam Saibal and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....itle Suit No.10 of 1999. 2. The respondents No.1-7 instituted Title Suit No.10 of 1999 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Bhedergonj, Shariatpur for declara­tion of title in respect of .08 acres of land as described in schedule to the plaint with a further declaration that the deed No.1475 dated 1......inul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.735 of 2009. (From the Judgment and Order dated 26th January, 2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2707 of 2000) Judgment Surendra Kumar ......uit No.10 of 1999 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Bhedergonj, Shariatpur for declara­tion of title in respect of .08 acres of land as described in schedule to the plaint with a further declaration that the deed No.1475 dated 18th April, 1985 registered before the Sub-Registrar, Palong, Shariatpur ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Petitioner Vs. Ali Azam Saibal and others………………Respondents Judgment January 7, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-the respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21

Gazipur Razzakia Janakallyan High School Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....rdinate Judge, 2nd Court, Laxmipur in Title Suit No.30 of 1995. 2. Petitioner instituted the above suit against the respondent for declaration of title in the suit property measuring 2.67 acres of land as described in the schedule to the plaint. Its' case is that Kali Mohon Sen Gupta, the recorde......97 of the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Laxmipur in Title Suit No.30 of 1995. 2. Petitioner instituted the above suit against the respondent for declaration of title in the suit property measuring 2.67 acres of land as described in the schedule to the plaint. Its' case is that Kali Mohon ...... 2. Petitioner instituted the above suit against the respondent for declaration of title in the suit property measuring 2.67 acres of land as described in the schedule to the plaint. Its' case is that Kali Mohon Sen Gupta, the recorded owner of the suit lands as per request of the local people gi......zakia Janakallyan High School……………..Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh…………...........Respondent Judgment January 4, 2010. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner. Not repre..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26

Kanal Chandra Das being dead his heirs; Reba Rani and oth­ers Vs. Sree Nripendra Chandra Mandal and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....in Title Appeal No.147 of 1997 reversing those dated 04.06.1997 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Naogaon in decreeing the suit. 2. The facts involved in the case, in short, are that the land of lot No.1 of 'Ka' sched­ule land of the plaint belonged to Gadadhar, Gaur and Netai; that be......ppeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 577. ......Naogaon in Title Appeal No.147 of 1997 reversing those dated 04.06.1997 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Naogaon in decreeing the suit. 2. The facts involved in the case, in short, are that the land of lot No.1 of 'Ka' sched­ule land of the plaint belonged to Gadadhar, Gaur and Netai;...... Rani and oth­ers……........Petitioners Vs. Sree Nripendra Chandra Mandal and others…………......Respondents Judgment January 17, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Horendr..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58

Mst. Komla Begum and another Vs. Md. Shahab Ali and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....e Munsif Court of Sreepur Upazila and was renumbered as Title Suit No.425 of 1983 against Bangladesh and others. The suit was for declaration of title and confirmation of possession alleging that the land meas­uring 3.31 acres of D.S. Khatian Nos.687, 589, 10003, 678 of mouza Nohata, Police station...... Kumar Sinha J Mst. Komla Begum and another…………….Petitioners Vs. Md. Shahab Ali and others……………........Respondents Order March 15, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. C...... of right of the case property in the name of the original owner and record the names of the writ petitioner respondents as forcible pos­sessors in the remark column. 2. The facts, in short, are that the respon­dent Nos.1-10 as petitioners filed Writ Petition No.2258 of 2004 in the High Court D......and another…………….Petitioners Vs. Md. Shahab Ali and others……………........Respondents Order March 15, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28

Surujit Bose (Raju) Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....ebayets. The C.S. record was rightly prepared and published in the name of Roy Bahadur Karuna Das Bose on behalf of the deity Sree Sree Laxmi Narayan Jew. The Managing Shebayet started possessing the land of C.S. Plot Nos.94 and 95 by erecting some sheds and kuccha rooms upon case plot No.65 and let......-on-Record-For Respondent No.1. Not rep­resented- Respondent Nos. 2-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 2087 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated the 2nd day of August, 2009 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.3418 of 2008). Judgment Mohammad Fazlul .............Petitioner Vs Bangladesh and others…………........Respondents Judgment January 26, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by Nurul Islam...... Surujit Bose (Raju)…......................Petitioner Vs Bangladesh and others…………........Respondents Judgment January 26, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Am..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23

Md. Abdur Rouf Vs. Judge of Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

....40 of 1989 on 17.06.1989 in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge and Commercial Court No.1, Dhaka for recovery of Tk. 3, 95,956.00 only by selling the mortgaged property measuring 9 decimals of land appertaining to C.S. Plot No.804, R.S. Plot No.2923 under C.S. Khatian No.64, D.P. Khatian No.1......d. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos.3-12. Not represented-Respondent Nos.1-2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.299 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 06.01.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7729 of 2008.) Judgment Md. Abdul Matin ...... leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 06.01.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7729 of 2008 discharg­ing the Rule. 2. The facts, in short, are that the respon­dent No.2-Bank as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.270 of 1986 in the Court of the...... No.1, Dhaka, Judge Court Compound, P.S. Kotwali, District-Dhaka and others .....................Respondents Judgment March 18, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos.3-12. No..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73

Azizur Rahman Khan and others Vs. Md. Aynul Miah and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)

.... the owner, Hajera Bibi and her son, filed a suit being the Title Suit No.33 of 2000 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Third Court, Dhaka, praying for a decree for declaration of his title in the suit-land and recovery of the khas pos­session, contending, inter alia, that the suit land originally be......mmel Hossain J Azizur Rahman Khan and others………………Petitioners Vs. Md. Aynul Miah and others…………….......Respondents Order March 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Masood R. Sobhan, Advocate, instruct­ed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioners Vs. Md. Aynul Miah and others…………….......Respondents Order March 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Masood R. Sobhan, Advocate, instruct­ed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respond...... Vs. Md. Aynul Miah and others…………….......Respondents Order March 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Masood R. Sobhan, Advocate, instruct­ed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not repr..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21

Md. Abid Khan and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....tration of Urdu speaking people, who were citizens of the erst while East Pakistan the so called Geneva Camp has attained any special status so as to be excluded from the operation of the laws of the land including the said President Order, the Electoral Rolls Ordinance, 1982 or the Citizenship Act,......Md. Abid Khan and others ..........…Petitioners Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others ...........…Respondents Judgment May 5, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Mukter Ahmed Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 34 DLR 29; Abdul Khaleque...... Election Commissioner and the related election functionaries and also the Government as to why they should not be directed to register the petitioners as voters. 3. All the ten petitioners claim that they are Urdu speaking citizen of Bangladesh, permanent residents of the Mohammadpur area residi......ladesh and others, 34 DLR 29; Abdul Khaleque Vs. The Court of Settlement and others, 44 DLR 273; Bangladesh Vs. Prof. Golam Azam, 46 DLR (AD) 192. Lawyers Involved: M. I. Farooqui, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Zaman Akter, Assistant Attorney General - For the Respondents. Writ Petitio..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 94

Ali Akbar Vs. Farijuddin and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

....l Procedure. 3. Facts essential and requisite for the purpose of answering to the question posed may succinctly be stated and noticed. 4. Petitioner of this Civil Revision Petition as plaintiff land a suit being Title Suit No.72 of 1985 in the Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Kachua, Cha......ka). Civil Revision No. 189 of 1987 (Comilla). Judgment AK Badrul Huq J.- The fate of this Civil Revision Petition hinges on answer to the following core question, whether a Miscellaneous Case under Order 9, rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was directed for restoration of a su......d and noticed. 4. Petitioner of this Civil Revision Petition as plaintiff land a suit being Title Suit No.72 of 1985 in the Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Kachua, Chandpur for declaration that solenama filed by plaintiff-petitioner on 14-8-1985 in Miscellaneous Case No. 49 of 1984 and Tit......li Akbar ………………………Petitioner Vs. Farijuddin and another………….. Opposite Parties Judgment November 16, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Qamrunnessa, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 6285 of 1991 (D..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 83