Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Giasuddin (Md) Vs. MV Forum Power and ors, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....e 50%. By fax message dated 23.1.1996 defendant No. 4 confirmed to supply the vessel at Mongla port the aforesaid items at the rate, terms and conditions of the plaintiff. Defendant No. 4 gave supply orders to the plaintiff as agent of defendant No.1 to be delivered an installed on board of defendan..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Nazem Uddin Vs. Election Tribunal & Others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... amendments can not be struck down. ……………………(11) (ii) The High Court Division should not entertain writ petitions against interlocutory orders passed by the Election Tribunal in the interest of speedy disposal of election petitions &h..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mahmuda Khatun and others Vs. Abul Younus Talukder, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....davit filed before the High Court Division, (from the additional paper book) the applications filed by the respondents in the trial Court for substitution of the heirs of said Dr. Ismail Khan and the orders passed by that court allowing substitution of those heirs. On the basis of those records Mr. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e ought not to have acted without considering the allegation made by the complainant. The High Court Division has observed, "It is true the learned Magistrate did not pass necessary orders on the applications filed by the informant and the predecessor followed by him was not p..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
National Board of Revenue and othÂers Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....import without any further delay. 3. In spite of the above recommendation the said writ respondent No. 3 in violation thereof did not put up the matter before the concerned Ministry for necessary orders. Thereafter subsequent application of the respondent to the above effect went unheeded. 5..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- All these petitions for leave to appeal arise out of the judgments and orders dated 03.03.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....casioning failure of justice, review petition should not be entertained lightly. The provisions under Articles 23 and 24 of the President’s Order 16 of 1972 are intended to cover only orders passed with jurisdiction and these provide no protection to orders passed without jurisdicti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... said provision do not have any application in respect of the AGMs in question but the contemners willfully and deliberately possibly acting at the behest of some interested quarters floated the orders of the Court. 10. This is further apparent from the record that by judgment date..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... his juniors; as he is retired so there is no scope to promote him in the Post of Commissioner of Taxes. The Ministry of Establishment agreed with the claim of the appellant but did not execution the orders in accordance with law. The said order of the Ministry of Establishment dated 10.8.2000 is il..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....de. We are, therefore, of the view that ends of justice would be met if the two appellants are convicted thereunder. 15. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are allowed in part. The orders of conviction and sentence are altered. The two appellants namely Shafiuddin Sheikh and Jaber..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97