Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2261-2280 of 3180 results.
Nasir Hossain Chaklader & ors Vs. Joint Dist Judge & Artha Rin Adalat 2, Dk & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... filed long after two and half years is hopelessly barred by limitation and as such are liable to be rejected as per provisions of Section 28 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. 9. As no property of the now deceased Mr. Masudul Alam Chaklader was mortgaged with the said, bank and the ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Nasir Hossain Chaklader and others………………...................................Petitio..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Jamiruddin Biswas Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....hairman of the Union Parishad sent the said resolution to the respondent No. 4 on 04.04.2004. One of the interested inhabitants of Baharampur village gave an undertaking of gift away 0.50 acre of property if the place for proposed construction of Dohakul Union Parishad is selected at Braha......……………………….............................................Petitioner Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………Respondent Judgment November 18, 2007. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 87
M/S. Nur Mohammad and Company Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd it is stated that the suit land originally belonged to a company which was a British Company incorporated in London as "Rally Brothers" and after the liberation of the country the said property had been declared as an abandoned property under President's Order No. 16 of 1972 an......nbsp; (Civil) Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J M/S. Nur Mohammad and Company Limited ………………………&hellip..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Shamsun Nahar and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....l Procedure for setting aside ex parte decree dated 19.8.1995 passed in Title Suit No. 1 of 1995. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff-respondent filed the suit stating, inter alia, that the suit property originally belonged to Ahadon Ali, whose name was recorded in C.S. Khatian. The suit land a....... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 241
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Sabera Aman and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ferring to the provision of Rule 11(3) of the Emergency Power Rules, 2007 rejected the prayer for bail and that also rejected the prayer for staying the judgment of the Special Court confiscating the property of the respondent No.1. 7. It appears that the respondent No.1 having had not been relea......mad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Government of Bangladesh…........Appellant Vs. Sabera Aman and others............Respondents Judgment April 17, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Hasan Foiz..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Md. Kamal Hossain Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....gave its consent the respondent No.2, a stranger, filed an application under Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the sale on the ground that he was ready to buy the said property at a higher price of Tk.3,50,000/- whereupon the Court ordered him to deposit Tk.50,000/- w......hul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Kamal Hossain..... Appellant Vs. The Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others..... Respondents Judgment August 19, 2008. Case Referred to- Punjab Mercantil..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Shafiuddin Miah and another Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakhya and others, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
....y fact in obtaining the sanctioned plan. 8. Leave was further granted to consider whether the High Court Division failed to consider the fact that respondent No. 4 has only claim in the property to the extent of 1/5th of her deceased fathers share, of total land of 1.20 acres and that......ivision (Civil) Present: Latifur Rahman J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J AM Mahmudur Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Md. Shafiuddin Miah and another.......................Appellants Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakhya and o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Aloke Nath Dey Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....at the instant application for succession certificate has not been filed by the appellant but same has been filed by his alleged attorney Mr. Lutfor Rahman Sarder fraudulently and for grabbing the property and as such the application was liable to be dismissed. The Government of Bangladesh conte......llip;... ..........Appellants Vs. Government of Bangladesh..................Respondent Judgment March 11, 2003. Cases Referred to- Mt. Shyam Sundari Devi and others v. Sarti Devi and others, AIR 1962 Patna 220; State Bank of India v. Netai Ch. Porel, AI..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Jasiron Nesa and another Vs. Hamida Bewa and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Suit No. 48 of 1983 dismissing the suit. 2. The respondent as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 48 of 1983 in the Court of the then Munsif, Sujanagar for declaration of title in the suit property against the present appellants as defendants alleging inter alia, that the suit prop......is Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 513. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Md. Shafiullah and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.....1, that the contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant No.1 has been frustrated in view of an order of injunction in Title Suit No.360 of 1979 restraining the defendant No.1 from dealing with property which is the subject matter of the Title Suit No.50 of 1984 and thus defendant No.1 has bee...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Taffzzal Islam J Begum Lutfunnessa......................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Shafiullah and others................. Respondents Judgment July 31, 2004. Result: The review petit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Gouranga Lal Sheel & others Vs. Gouranga Chandra Nath & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....92, making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiffs brought the suit for a declaration that they are the owners of the disputed land and that the enlistment of the suit property as vested property is illegal stating inter alia, that the disputed property originally be......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Gouranga Lal Sheel & others ....................Appellants Vs. Gouranga Chandra Nath & others.............Respondents Judgment July 31, 2004. Lawyers..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy and ors., 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... wife of him. 2. Facts in this case, in short, are that Trailakha Nath Roy was the husband of the respondent No.1 Swarashati Roy. Swarashati Roy and her son Bolai Roy used to look after the property of the said testator, Trailakha Nath Roy during his old age till his death. Trailakha Nath...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Hussain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Kanai Lal Roy..........................Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy and ors..................Respondents Order August 17, 2002. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Hafiz Md. Shamsul Alam & others Vs. Musleuddin Ahmed & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....re guilty of subletting and hence the impugned judgment requires interference by us. The appeal, therefore, is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 488. ......nior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-2. No represented-Respondent No. 3. Civil Appeal No.190 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4348 of 1999) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other Vs. Abdul Hakim, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act, 1948. 4. The trial Court decreed the suit finding that the suit land described in the schedule 'Ga' of the plaint of not included in the acquired property and the plaintiff respondent has title and possession therein, the government defenda......d in: 1 ADC (2004) 473. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Anu Miah and others Vs. Gauranga Chandra Sharma and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....d 3(ka) of the plaint stating to the effect that while said Debendra Chandra Sharma had been owning and possessing the land described in 1(ka) and 1(kha) of the plaint he exchanged schedule 1(kha) property on 19.10.82 by registered kabala with that of the defendant No. 1's property mentioned in ......s also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 462. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Anowara Begum Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....sonment for life or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation. - In this section "dowry" means any property or valuable security demanded from the wife or her parent, guardian or any other relation......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Anowara Begum ………………...Appellant Vs. The State and another .............Respondents Judgment March 7, 2004. Lawyers Involved..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Md. Mosharraf Hossain Vs. Daulat Ahmed and ors., 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....g that pre-emptors failed to establish that the transaction was not an exchange but out and out a sale and that parties to the transaction did not part with the possession of their respective property. So the ratio of the case referred to from the side of the respondent is of no help in any...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Mosharraf Hossain……………………Appellant Vs. Daulat Ahmed and ors..........Respondents Judgment July 7, 2002. Cases Referred to- ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Mujibul Haque Vs. Lokman Mia, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
..... 5. It is now submitted by the plaintiff review petitioner that in the meantime he has come to know from Serajuddin Ahmed one of the heirs of the recorded tenant Md. Musa Mia that the suit property was never acquired by the Government and as such the Title Suit No. 176 of 1984 in the Cou......Senior, Advocate, instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Review Petition No. 23 of 2001. (From the judgment and Order dated 25 July 2002 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 75 of 1997). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Administrator, Gammon Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Tota Mia and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Mr. Justice Bazlur Rahman and therefore he failed to take necessary steps for which the Rule was discharged only on 18.10.1997 the appellant revived a proclamation of sale of immovable property from the 4th Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka fixing 21.10.1997 for sale of the appellant......Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J Administrator, Gammon Bangladesh Ltd...........................Appellant. Vs. Tota Mia and others ...........Respondents. Judgment November 24, 2002. Lawyers Invol..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Mir Kalimuddin Vs. Mohammad Dhukhi Mondal and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ntiff-Respondent filed suit, Title Suit No. 151 of 1967, seeking declaration of title and confirmation of possession in respect of the land measuring 3.75 acres which he acquired in exchange of his property in India. It was the case of the plaintiff that he is in possession of the land in suit si...... Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mir Kalimuddin, being dead his heirs 1(a) Asia Khatun alias Chamatkar Biby and others................. Petitioners Vs. Mohammad Dhukhi Mondal and others..........Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
31213120311831153114311331083100309730963095309430933088308630853083308030793078