Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2281-2300 of 4307 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Wahab & others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....annot be deprived for any substantial reasons. To make department of the Government exception to this Rule would be putting a premium on negligence and want of proper diligence in public offices. The State in not entitled to special consideration in the matter of condoning of delay. An extension of ...... Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 30. ...... taken his Lordship Mr. Justice Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 30. ...... taken his Lordship Mr. Justice Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 30. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Sheikh Md. Shahidun Nabi Vs. University of Dhaka and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....h now against the petitioner. Annexure‑C is the testimonial dated 17.8.88 issued by the Principal, Barhamganj College stating that the petitioner did not take part in any activity subversive to the State or discipline of the College and that he passed the BA (Pass) examination in the 2nd Division ......rt High Court Division (Civil Original Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Sheikh Md. Shahidun Nabi................Petitioner Vs. University of Dhaka and others...................Respondents Judgment March 14, 1991. ......in passing the impugned order dated 28.11.89 (Annexure-I). In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 20. ......in passing the impugned order dated 28.11.89 (Annexure-I). In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 20. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 122
Abdul Jalil Sheik Vs. Md. Abdul Quddus Sarker, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....ecting a Review Petition under Order 47, rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he failed Miscellaneous Case No.32 of 1983 under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act against the opposite party pre‑emptee for pre‑emption of the l......ase is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 18. ......e matter of pre‑emption by giving the parties due notice. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 18. ...... Present: Abdul Hasib J Abdul Jalil SheikÂ………..Petitioner. Vs. Md. Abdul Quddus Sarker............Opposite Party. Judgment June 12, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momin Talukder, Advocate ‑For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑ the Opposite Party. Civil Revisi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
....) should not be declared to have been given without lawful authority and is of no legal effect.
2. Respondent No.2 as the petitioner earlier filed an application on 3.9.84 under section 95A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act read with President’s order No.88 of 1982 and President's order ........Petitioners
VS.
Upazila Revenue Officer, Patiya, Chittagong & others………………………Respondents
Judgment
June 12, 1991.
Cases Referred to-
Abdul Mannan & others Vs. Kuloda Ranjan Mowali & others, 31 DLR (AD) 195; Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed, 34 DLR (AD) 237.......ugned order passed by the Upazila Revenue Officer in the aforesaid ML Case was passed without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect.
Ed.
This Case is also Referred to: 48 DLR (1996) 25. ......ugned order passed by the Upazila Revenue Officer in the aforesaid ML Case was passed without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect.
Ed.
This Case is also Referred to: 48 DLR (1996) 25. ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Aftab Uddin (Md.) Vs. Bangladesh, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....ed by Secretary, Ministry of establishment, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others………………….Respondents Judgment February 20, 1995. Cases Referred to- State of Assam and another, appellant Vs. Kueseswar Saikia and others, Respondents, AIR 1970 (SC) 16......rt High Court Division (Special original jurisdiction) Present: Naimuddin Ahmed J Md. Rahul Amin J Aftab Uddin (Md.)....................................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, represented by Secretary, Ministry of establishment, Government of the People’s...... Majumder, the learned Advocates for the petitioner. The prayer for staying operation of the order be stated for one month from this date. Ed. This Case is also Referred to: 48 DLR (1996) 1. ...... Majumder, the learned Advocates for the petitioner. The prayer for staying operation of the order be stated for one month from this date. Ed. This Case is also Referred to: 48 DLR (1996) 1. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 173
....High Court Division was correct in refusing the status quo.
2. The crucial question is in the facts and circumstances of the case whether the excess land is retainable in view of section 20 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950. The owners made an endeavour for a certificate under sectio......Civil)
Present
FKMA Munim CJ
Ruhul Islam J
Badrul Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Debishahar Agricultural & Fish Farming Co-operative Society Ltd………....Appellant
Vs.
Narayan Chandra Swarnakar & others…………..Respondents
Judgment
March 11, 1982......nst the Government is maintainable whether it is filed by the ex-rent receivers directly or in the name of their co-operative Society.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 98.
......nst the Government is maintainable whether it is filed by the ex-rent receivers directly or in the name of their co-operative Society.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 98.
..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Abdul Haque Miah and another Vs. Abdul Rashid & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ur of Co-sharers whose interest has accrued by inheritance from their father, who had become a co-sharer in the by purchase, is protected from pre-emption under sub-section (10) (a) of section 96 the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950. 2. This question has arisen in a pre-emption, namely Mi...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present FKMA Munim CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Abdul Haque Miah and another..……………Appellants Vs. Abdul Rashid & another………………Respondents Judgment November 10, 1982. ...... Division confirming the order of the lower appellate court is set aside and that of the trial court is restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 54. ...... Division confirming the order of the lower appellate court is set aside and that of the trial court is restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 54. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Bangladesh & another Vs. Md. Salimullah and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....zur Rahman Majumder……………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others................Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 68 of 1982) Judgment June 30, 1981. Cases Referred To- State Vs. Dosso, (1959) 11 DLR (SC) 1 = PLD 1958 (SC) 533; Province of East Pakistan Vs. Md. Mehdi A......te Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabudin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Bangladesh & another.............Appellants Vs. Md. Salimullah............Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 90 of 1981) And Bangladeshâ€......n filed, the certificate will be infructuous but in both cases the Writ Petition and the judgment of the High Court Division will not abate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (1983) 1. ......n filed, the certificate will be infructuous but in both cases the Writ Petition and the judgment of the High Court Division will not abate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (1983) 1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 181
Md. Anowarul Mustakin and another Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....e Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Obaidul Hassan J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Anowarul Mustakin and another…...........Appellants Vs. The State...….............................................Respondent Judgment April 24, 2011. ......n: ......scharged from their respective bail bonds. Send down the lower Court records with a copy of this judgment immediately. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......scharged from their respective bail bonds. Send down the lower Court records with a copy of this judgment immediately. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
.... under section 304. "The point raised is of general importance. Leave to appeal is granted."
6. None has appeared on behalf of the Respondent. The learned Deputy Attorney-General appearing for the State has submitted that on the finding of the High Court the offence proved is one under section 30......on
(Criminal)
Present:
Syed AB Mahmud Hussain CJ
Kemaluddin Hossain J
Fazle Munim J
Superintendent & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, Government of Bangladesh........Appellant
Vs.
Siddique Ahmed.........Respondent
Judgment
December 6, 1977.
Lawyers Involved:
......isonment for two years resÂpectively, the sentences to run-concurrently.
2. The prosecution case was that on the night of 13th December, 1967 at about 8-30 P.M. the complainant Fazlul Haque alias Kalamdar Ali, full brother of deceased Tafazzal Hossain after saying Tarabi prayer returned home fro......ed. All the sentences are to run concurrently. The Respondent will now surrender to his bail bond to serve the remainder of his sentences.
Ed.
This Case also referred in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 29.
..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Monjur Morshed Chowdhury & Others. Vs. Haji Abul Kashem Sawdgar & Others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....; Ramjan Ali Mistry Vs. Hedayet Ullah, 31 DLR (AD) 183; AIR 1967 SC 389; Bombay Vs. United Motors, AIR 1958 (SC) 252; Seaford Court Estates Ltd. Vs. Asher (1949) 2 KB 481; Padmasundrao Rao (Dead) Vs. State of TN, AIR 2002 SC 1334; BR Enterprise Vs. UP, AIR 1999 SC 1867; Union of India Vs. Pradip Kum....... Abdul Matin J SAN Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Monjur Morshed Chowdhury (Md.) @ Monjur Morshed and others.........Appellants Vs. Haji Abul Kashem Sawdagar and another........................................Respondents J......l is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 83, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 97, 8 LG (2011) AD 109, VIII ADC (2011) 319, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 225. ......l is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 83, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 97, 8 LG (2011) AD 109, VIII ADC (2011) 319, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 225. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 210
Giasuddin Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Dhaka University and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....the Senate of the Registered Graduates of Dhaka University is declared to have been made without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 650. ......gh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: KM Hasan J Md. Abdul Quddus J Giasuddin Ahmed Chowdhury alias Gias Kamal Chowdhury and others………………Petitioners Vs. Dhaka University and others………………Respondents Judgment July 12, 2000. Cas......the Senate of the Registered Graduates of Dhaka University is declared to have been made without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 650. ......the Senate of the Registered Graduates of Dhaka University is declared to have been made without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 650. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Fazlur Rahman & Co. Vs. M.V. CHOSUN HOPE and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....W.1 6 Photocopy of Bank Guarantee 6.7.1999 P.W.1 7 Letter of Narayangonj CCI 6.7.1999 P.W.1 8 Statement of Sonali Bank 6.7.1999 P.W.1 9, 9(A-C) Agreem...... Court High Court Division (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Present: AFM Abdur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman & Co. Private Ltd. Nahar Mansions, 150 Motijheel C.A. Dhaka…........…Plaintiff Vs. 1. M.V.CHOSUN HOPE, now at Chittagong Port.………......Defendant 2. Master of M.V.CHOSU......days from the date of decree drawn. The office is directed to calculate the interest and the cost and inform the same to the defendant within the date fixed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......days from the date of decree drawn. The office is directed to calculate the interest and the cost and inform the same to the defendant within the date fixed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Md. Saidul Islam and others Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....rt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J AKM Zahirul Hoque J Md. Saidul Islam and others……………………Petitioners Vs. The State………………………………………….Opposite party Judgment March 6, 2011. ......Supreme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J AKM Zahirul Hoque J Md. Saidul Islam and others……………………Petitioners Vs. The State………………………………………….Opposite party Judgment March......tion of the case, the concern Court is hereby directed to consider the bail of the petitioners. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ......tion of the case, the concern Court is hereby directed to consider the bail of the petitioners. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Mizanur Rahman Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....vision (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Mizanur Rahman ……………………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………………………….Opposite party Judgment ......gh Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Mizanur Rahman ……………………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………………………….Opposite party ...... investigation of the case, the learned concern court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ...... investigation of the case, the learned concern court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Gias Uddin Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....rt Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J AKM Zahirul Hoque J Gias Uddin …………………………………….……..Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………………….………….Opposite party Judgment March 13, 2...... High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J AKM Zahirul Hoque J Gias Uddin …………………………………….……..Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………………….………….Opposite party Judgment ......make the case ready for trial, the concern Court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......make the case ready for trial, the concern Court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. AKM Zahirul Hoque J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Jamsher Ali Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ion (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Jamsher Ali …………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State……………………………………………………Opposite party Judgment April......Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Jamsher Ali …………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. The State……………………………………………………Opposite party Judgme......to make the case ready, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......to make the case ready, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the petitioner. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Shahadat Hossen Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....me Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Shahadat Hossen …………………………Appellant Vs. The State………………………………….……Respondent Judgment March 29, 2011. Lawy...... in: ......t liberty to cancel the bail, if the accused appellant misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......t liberty to cancel the bail, if the accused appellant misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Md. Rasel Miah Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....on (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Rasel Miah ……………………………………………………Appellant Vs. The State …………………………………………………..………Respondent Judgment ......ourt Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Rasel Miah ……………………………………………………Appellant Vs. The State …………………………………………………..………Respondent J......he case ready for trial, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the appellant. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he case ready for trial, the learned trial court may consider the bail of the appellant. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Md. Fazlar Rahman @ Major Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....rt Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Fazlar Rahman @ Major ………………………..….…… Appellant Vs. The State……………………………………………………..…………Respondent Judgmen...... High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Fazlar Rahman @ Major ………………………..….…… Appellant Vs. The State……………………………………………………..…………Respondent......y at once if not been wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the L.C. records at once along with judgment. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......y at once if not been wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the L.C. records at once along with judgment. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
50004995499449694966496549624960495849544951494249384935493449334932493149304928