Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2321-2324 of 2324 results.
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Ali by a deed of sale dated 13.2.1975 out of said Plot No.408. Municipal holding was created in the name of Iman Ali. On the death of Iman Ali defendants have been in possession of RS Plot No. 408 by payment of rents, rates and taxes in separate holding. Similarly the plaintiffs are in possession of......sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t No. 1 as plaintiff instituted the above S. C. C. Suit against the petitioner and proforma-respondent Nos. 2-5 for eviction from the suit premises upon realization of arrear rents and also for payment of compensation on the ground of default in the payment of rents since January, 19......agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he powers to do administrative acts of a routine nature when so authorised by the directors such as the power to .affix common seal of the company to any document or to draw and endorse any cheque on the account of the company in any bank or to draw and endorse negotiable instrument or to ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....espondent No. 1 having felt necessity of cash money he on receiving Tk. 36,000/- from the appellant and his brother Fazlul Haque (now dead) mortgaged shop no. 235(kha) with the stipulation that on payment of the money the shop as well as the mortgaged deed would be returned and also possession o......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
337325324306