Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 221-240 of 838 results.
Md. Nazimuddin Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ......irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ......C); Quilter, (1882) 9 QBD 672 (CA); Smith, (1901) AC 297, 305; West, (1911) 2CH. 1; I.T.Commissioner, (1916) 2 KBD 249; Delhi Cloth and General Milk, 54 JA 421; DaiVanayaka Reddiyar, ILR 50 Mad. 857; Ram Singha, ILR 50 All. 965; United Province, AIR 1941 (FC) 16: Kirpa Singh, AIR 1928 Lah. 627; Vasu......irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1976 | Hits: 2
Salamat Khan Vs. Q.G. Ahad, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ......es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ......lip;………….Respondent Judgment January 20, 1976. Result: Cases Referred to- Jugal Kishore Vs. Goolbai, AIR 1955 (SC) 812; Union of India Vs. Rallia Ram, AIR 1963 (SC) 1685; Carlill Vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, 1893 1 Q. B. 256; Brogden Vs. Metr......es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Jan, 1976 | Hits: 352
Amizuddin Ahmed Vs. Election Tribunal, Narayanganj and others, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....rcumstances of the case, we assess the costs at Taka one thousand only. S.M. Hussain, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 594 ......rcumstances of the case, we assess the costs at Taka one thousand only. S.M. Hussain, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 594 ......olute Cases Referred to- Stowe Vs. Jollife (1874), L.R.I.C. P-446 and "G.T. Mudaliar Vs. Sakuntala" AIR 1949 Mad. 835; Sirajuddin Ahmed Vs. Upendra Lala", 22 DLR (Dacca) 827; Ram Kr. Vs. Ratan, 35 C.W.N. 841. Lawyers Involved: Mouinul Haque with A. Gafur – Fo......rcumstances of the case, we assess the costs at Taka one thousand only. S.M. Hussain, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 594 ..Category: Election Law | Date: 7 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3
Mst. Masuda Khatoon & ors Vs. Maniruzzaman, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....576, Sarat Krishna Bose Vs. Bisweshwar Mitra & ors.; Pitamber Lal Vs. Dadhi Singh, ILR 46 All. 319; PLD 1959 (West Pakistan) Quetta 1, Muhammad Hashim Khan Vs. Major Fazal Elahi Khan; 10 DLR 521, Sreenibash Mukhupaddya and ors. Vs. Elahi Haider and ors.; 1969 D.LC 590 Nur Md. Babar Ali & ors......576, Sarat Krishna Bose Vs. Bisweshwar Mitra & ors.; Pitamber Lal Vs. Dadhi Singh, ILR 46 All. 319; PLD 1959 (West Pakistan) Quetta 1, Muhammad Hashim Khan Vs. Major Fazal Elahi Khan; 10 DLR 521, Sreenibash Mukhupaddya and ors. Vs. Elahi Haider and ors.; 1969 D.LC 590 Nur Md. Babar Ali & ors......sult: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Abdur Rahman Miji and ors. Vs. Abdul Wadud Mea and ors, 1952 PLR 2 Dac. 87; AIR 1959 Pat. 121 (Full Bench), Doma Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Ram Naresh Lal and ors.; Thakur Prasad Vs. Fakirullah, ILR 17 All. 106 Privy Council; Sarat Krishna ......s. Abdul Wadud Mea and ors, 1952 PLR 2 Dac. 87; AIR 1959 Pat. 121 (Full Bench), Doma Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Ram Naresh Lal and ors.; Thakur Prasad Vs. Fakirullah, ILR 17 All. 106 Privy Council; Sarat Krishna Bose and Biseshawar Mitra and others, 31 CWN 576; 4 DLR 621, Saferaddi Munshi Vs. Farman Ali..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 1 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 1
Bacha Meah Vs. Province of East Pakistan & anothers, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....e will be no order as to costs in any one of the cases. K. Hossain J.—I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 563 ......e will be no order as to costs in any one of the cases. K. Hossain J.—I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 563 ......le in Civil Revision No. 811 of 1968 is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Divisional Superintendent, N.W.R. Lahore Vs. Mohammad Sharif, Booking Clerk, N.W.R. Gujarat, 15 DLR (SC) 261; Anant Ram and others Vs. District Magistrate, Jodhpur and another, AIR 1956 Rajasthan 145; Ganeshi Ram Vs.......e will be no order as to costs in any one of the cases. K. Hossain J.—I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 563 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 May, 1975 | Hits: 1
Monipur Tea Co. Ltd. And Ahmedur Rahman, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....f Association the company can exercise the powers under section 79 sub-section(3) of the Act……………………(23) Cases referred to- Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Joint Stoke company Madura; AIR 1938 Mad. 6......f Association the company can exercise the powers under section 79 sub-section(3) of the Act……………………(23) Cases referred to- Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Joint Stoke company Madura; AIR 1938 Mad. 6...... the Companies, Act. Let the Cost of the petitioner corns out of the assets of the company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 490. ......p;…………………(23) Cases referred to- Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Joint Stoke company Madura; AIR 1938 Mad. 640. Bal Krishna Maheswari Vs. Uma Shanker Mehrotra AIR. 1947 All. 367; Ahmed Hossain Vs. Sayedur Rahman 18 D..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 20 May, 1975 | Hits: 2
Badruddin Vs. The Chairman, In the Court of Tribunal Judge, Ctg. & another, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....esult, the Rule is made absolute. We, however, make no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 611 ......esult, the Rule is made absolute. We, however, make no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 611 ......esult, the Rule is made absolute. We, however, make no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 611 ......esult, the Rule is made absolute. We, however, make no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 611 ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 24 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 2
Messrs. Haji Azam Vs. Singleton Binda & Co. Ltd. Binder, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....on (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 are held to be not maintainable. S.M. Mohseen Ali, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 583 ......on (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 are held to be not maintainable. S.M. Mohseen Ali, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 583 ................Opposite Party Judgment April 23, 1975. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- M/s. Yangteza Ltd. Vs. Barlars Brothers, 14 DLR (SC) 151; Ram Babu Vs. State, DLR (1950) SC 155. Lawyers Involved: Moinul Hossain, Mozammel Hoque Kh......on (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 are held to be not maintainable. S.M. Mohseen Ali, J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 583 ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 3
Sayed Maksud Ah¬med Vs. Sunil Kumar Basu & others, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....the rule with costs. Order In accordance with majority view the rule is discharged with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 275 ......the rule with costs. Order In accordance with majority view the rule is discharged with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 275 ...... Madras 567; Vendeateswarlu Vs. State of Madras AIR 1954 Madras 587; Haji Abul Quasen Vs. Abdur Rahman (1970) 22 D.L.R. Dacca 822; Piari Lal Vs. Hanifun-Nissa I.L.R. 38 Allahabad 240; Rewa Mahton Vs. Ram Kishen Singh I L R 14 Calcutta 1, Queen Empress. Vs. Wazir Jan I.L.R. 10 Allahabad 66; Aranuchal...... Madras 871; Mubarak Begum and another Vs. Sushil Kumar and others. A.I.R. 1957 Rajshthon 154; Begu and others Vs. The King Emperor 41 C.L.J. 439; Jagrup Saha Vs. Ramand Saha I. L.R 39 Allahabad 635; Krishna Shami Vs. Ramsbami A.I.R. 1971 P.C. 197; Tikait Ajant Singh Vs. F.T. Chfristian 17 C.W.N. 86..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 4
Sree Sree Radha Krish¬na Deities Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1974, 3 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 116. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 116. ......t March 5, 1974. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Kumudini Welfare Trust of Bengal Ltd. (1959) 11 DLR 57; Md. Yasin (1974) 26 DLR 82;Mt. Sushila Devi Vs. Ram Kishan Das and others, A.I.R. 1943 Lahore 39; C. Mohammed Yunus Vs. Syed Unnissa and others, A.I......e without any order as to costs. Let the records be sent down expeditiously. Amirul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 116. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Mar, 1975 | Hits: 2
Ramjan Khan alias Ramjan Ali Khan Vs. Obaidul Huq Chowdhury and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....uq is holding the land on his own account treating his application maintainable. We make no order as to cost. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 57. ......uq is holding the land on his own account treating his application maintainable. We make no order as to cost. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 57. ......DLR (AD) (1976) 57. ......uq is holding the land on his own account treating his application maintainable. We make no order as to cost. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 57. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1975 | Hits: 271
Md. Nur Hossain Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
..... 1930 P.C. 22; Mst. Bhagwati Vs. Ram Kali, 66 Indian Appeals 145; A.I.R. 1939 P.C page 133 Hock Vs. Administrator General; Raj Laksmi Dasi Vs. Banamali Sen, A.I.R. 1953 S.C. 33 M.S.M.; Sanaa Vs. Dr. Sree Krishna Sen, 1960 S.C. 86; Daraye Vs. State of U.P., A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1457; Amalgamated Coal Fi....... 1930 P.C. 22; Mst. Bhagwati Vs. Ram Kali, 66 Indian Appeals 145; A.I.R. 1939 P.C page 133 Hock Vs. Administrator General; Raj Laksmi Dasi Vs. Banamali Sen, A.I.R. 1953 S.C. 33 M.S.M.; Sanaa Vs. Dr. Sree Krishna Sen, 1960 S.C. 86; Daraye Vs. State of U.P., A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1457; Amalgamated Coal Fi......Province of East Pakistan 16 D.L.R. (S.C.) 438 (at page 442); Rally Brothers Ltd. Vs. Province of East Pakistan 17 D.L.R. S.C. 629; P.L.D. 1966, S.C. 409 17 DLR (SC) 629, same case PLD 1966 S.C. 409; Ram Kirpal Shukul Vs. Massammat Rup Kuari, 11 Indian Appeals page 37; Hook Vs. Administrator General......0 P.C. 22; Mst. Bhagwati Vs. Ram Kali, 66 Indian Appeals 145; A.I.R. 1939 P.C page 133 Hock Vs. Administrator General; Raj Laksmi Dasi Vs. Banamali Sen, A.I.R. 1953 S.C. 33 M.S.M.; Sanaa Vs. Dr. Sree Krishna Sen, 1960 S.C. 86; Daraye Vs. State of U.P., A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1457; Amalgamated Coal Fields ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 31 Jan, 1975 | Hits: 2
Govt. of the then East Pakistan Vs. M/s. Lucky Biri Company, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....1 (S.C.) 585. 7. The plaintiff has examined five witnesses and the defendant examined one. A number of exhibits have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in support of their case. 8. P.W.1 Sree Dayaram Khorabhai, one of the partners of M/s. Lucky Biri Co., has proved Ext 1 the partnership......1 (S.C.) 585. 7. The plaintiff has examined five witnesses and the defendant examined one. A number of exhibits have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in support of their case. 8. P.W.1 Sree Dayaram Khorabhai, one of the partners of M/s. Lucky Biri Co., has proved Ext 1 the partnership...... filed by the plaintiff respondent it was alleged, inter alia that the plaintiff M/s. Lucky Biri Company was a registered partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act, carrying on business at 6, Ram Prosad Shah Lane, Calcutta. The Company was represented by its partners Walamjee Deoji and Karma......ree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, but make no order as to costs. Abdul Mumith Chowdhury J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 411. ..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 25 Jan, 1975 | Hits: 3
Rajendra Shirali and others Vs. Mahadev Shirali, 1973, 2 CLC (HCD)
....tegories." I therefore, do not find any substance in this Rule. The rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 232. ......tegories." I therefore, do not find any substance in this Rule. The rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 232. ......ikh Ayezuddin Vs. Priya Sankar Choudhury, 6 D.L.R. 595; Abdul Shakerb Saheb Vs. Abdul Rahman Sahib, I.L.R 46 Madras 148; Chowdhury Md. Sarwar Vs. Shahadat Hossain Khan and others (F.M.A. 16 of 1970); Ramdhani Ram Vs. Sital Prasad Ram, AIR 1959 Patna 181; Someshwar Dayal and others Vs. Widow of Lalmo......tegories." I therefore, do not find any substance in this Rule. The rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 232. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 11 Jul, 1973 | Hits: 1
Seru Mia Vs. Fajilatennessa and others, 1973, 2 CLC (HCD)
.... is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)159 ...... is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)159 ...... is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate court are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)159 ......n. Section 54, inter alia, provides that:- It does not, of itself, create any interest in or charge on such property. 9. In the above mentioned case Ratish Chandra Mridha Vs. Hara Krishna Goldar an agreement between the vendor and the vendee contained a provision that the vendee ..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Jan, 1973 | Hits: 2
Mrs. June Ferguson & others Vs. Ameenur Rasheed Chaudhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ircumstances of the case, we direct that the suit may expeditiously be disposed of. Sayem, CJ. — I agree This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1973) 1 ......ircumstances of the case, we direct that the suit may expeditiously be disposed of. Sayem, CJ. — I agree This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1973) 1 .........Petitioners Vs. Ameenur Rasheed Chaudhury and others..........Opposite Parties Judgment July 5, 1972. Result: The rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Kant Ram Sil and another Vs. Sumitra Devi and others, 16 DLR Dacca 272; Serbeshwar Das Mohantu Vs. Baishn......ircumstances of the case, we direct that the suit may expeditiously be disposed of. Sayem, CJ. — I agree This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1973) 1 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Jul, 1972 | Hits: 0
Engineer Shaikh Rubaiyet Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....e result, the writ petition fails on the ground of incompetency. Accordingly the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 447. ......e result, the writ petition fails on the ground of incompetency. Accordingly the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 64 DLR (HCD) (2012) 447. ......Development Board and others Vs. Golam Rabbani Khan and others, in Civil petition for Leave to Appeal No.1354 of 2006; HD Vora Vs. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 2 SCC 337; State of Karnataka Vs. Shree Ramesh ware Rice Mills, Thrithahalli; State of Karnataka Vs. K Krishnappa Naidu and Co.; The Executi...... in Civil petition for Leave to Appeal No.1354 of 2006; HD Vora Vs. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 2 SCC 337; State of Karnataka Vs. Shree Ramesh ware Rice Mills, Thrithahalli; State of Karnataka Vs. K Krishnappa Naidu and Co.; The Executive Engineer, Thungabhadra Reservoir Division, Munirabad Vs. S T..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 96
....
Send down the lower Courts’ records.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......
Send down the lower Courts’ records.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......above observations, however, without any order as to cost. The order of status quo granted earlier is vacated.
Send down the lower Courts’ records.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......above observations, however, without any order as to cost. The order of status quo granted earlier is vacated.
Send down the lower Courts’ records.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abul Kashem and others Vs. Mst. Robila Khatoon and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....he interim order passed at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby re-called and vacated. Send down the lower Court's records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 166. ......he interim order passed at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby re-called and vacated. Send down the lower Court's records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 166. ......by Jodu Nath Biswas and Joggeshwar Biswas whose names were duly recorded in the aforementioned khatians in equal share. The aforesaid lands were acquired by Surja Kanta Ghosh, Haripada Ghosh and Kena Ram Ghosh and their names were duly recorded in S.A. Khatian. Due to communal unrest Khanto Bibi of ......he interim order passed at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby re-called and vacated. Send down the lower Court's records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 166. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Md. Kamruzzaman and others Vs. Abdus Sattar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....otiur Rahman the principal defendant. The defendant's case as stated in written statement was that C.S. Plot No.5/124 situated in Eastern side of C.S. Plot No.5 in which some land belonged to Moharaj Sree Shaelendra Chandra Nondi. Subsequently he gave pattan of 2.91 decimals of land to Insar Ali thr......otiur Rahman the principal defendant. The defendant's case as stated in written statement was that C.S. Plot No.5/124 situated in Eastern side of C.S. Plot No.5 in which some land belonged to Moharaj Sree Shaelendra Chandra Nondi. Subsequently he gave pattan of 2.91 decimals of land to Insar Ali thr...... the case and conclude the same within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 260. ...... the case and conclude the same within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 260. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
9018716495069483948795239510950593159126948951992629234925497108420840683908375