Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 241-260 of 614 results.
Janata Bank Vs. Saiful Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....plication of amendment has been brought by the plaintiff Janata Bank. 2. The appellant as plaintiff filed Money Suit No.122 of 2002 before the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge (Now Joint District Judge) Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra against the defendant respondent praying for recovery of Taka 39,49,957.00 a......ion of amendment has been brought by the plaintiff Janata Bank. 2. The appellant as plaintiff filed Money Suit No.122 of 2002 before the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge (Now Joint District Judge) Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra against the defendant respondent praying for recovery of Taka 39,49,957.00 as on 3......of amendment has been brought by the plaintiff Janata Bank. 2. The appellant as plaintiff filed Money Suit No.122 of 2002 before the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge (Now Joint District Judge) Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra against the defendant respondent praying for recovery of Taka 39,49,957.00 as on 31.05......ner Vs. Saiful Islam……………………………Respondent-Opposite Party Judgment March 12, 2006. Result: The application for amendment is allowed. Case Referred to- Kishandas Vs. Vithoba, (1909) 33 Bom 644. Lawyers Involved: J. K. Paul - For the Appellant. Md...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Delwar Hossain and others Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....s note of and fraudulent proceedings are to be nipped in the bud at the threshold. 2. The present proceeding is one of such where judgment-debtors in order to nullify judgment and decree passed by Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna in Artha Rin Case No.54 of 1998 without resorting to remedies available to ...... of and fraudulent proceedings are to be nipped in the bud at the threshold. 2. The present proceeding is one of such where judgment-debtors in order to nullify judgment and decree passed by Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna in Artha Rin Case No.54 of 1998 without resorting to remedies available to them u......and fraudulent proceedings are to be nipped in the bud at the threshold. 2. The present proceeding is one of such where judgment-debtors in order to nullify judgment and decree passed by Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna in Artha Rin Case No.54 of 1998 without resorting to remedies available to them under...... This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 585. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Janata Bank Ltd. Vs. Gulneara Begum and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... High Court Division making the Rule absolute. 2. The writ petitioner filed challenging the order No.4 dated 02.10.2003 and the order dated 06.06.2007 passed in Execution Case No.58 of 2004 by the Artha Rin Adalat, Comilla. 3. The facts relevant for the purpose of this application are that the......Court Division making the Rule absolute. 2. The writ petitioner filed challenging the order No.4 dated 02.10.2003 and the order dated 06.06.2007 passed in Execution Case No.58 of 2004 by the Artha Rin Adalat, Comilla. 3. The facts relevant for the purpose of this application are that the petit......t Division making the Rule absolute. 2. The writ petitioner filed challenging the order No.4 dated 02.10.2003 and the order dated 06.06.2007 passed in Execution Case No.58 of 2004 by the Artha Rin Adalat, Comilla. 3. The facts relevant for the purpose of this application are that the petitione...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Jaynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Janata Bank Ltd……………………………...Petitioner Vs. Gulneara Begum and others………………...Respondents Judgment April 20, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Sh..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Jan-E-Alam Vs. Rupali Bank Limited and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....udgment and order dated 30.01.2008 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No.202 of 2002 setting aside the order No.39 dated 23.04.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, First Court, Chittagong in Mortgage Execution Case No.32 of 1998. 2. The facts ......t and order dated 30.01.2008 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No.202 of 2002 setting aside the order No.39 dated 23.04.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, First Court, Chittagong in Mortgage Execution Case No.32 of 1998. 2. The facts of the......d order dated 30.01.2008 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No.202 of 2002 setting aside the order No.39 dated 23.04.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, First Court, Chittagong in Mortgage Execution Case No.32 of 1998. 2. The facts of the cas......on (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Jan-E-Alam………..................Petitioner Vs. Rupali Bank Limited and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 2009. Result: The petition is ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 140
Suratunnessa and others Vs. Nurjahab Bibi and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... against the judgment and order dated 15.01.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.887 of 1999 affirming the judgment and order dated 22.11.1998 passed by the Sub-ordinate Judge (Artha Rin Adalat), Sylhet in Miscellaneous Appeal No.93 of 1996 reversing the judgment and order dat......st the judgment and order dated 15.01.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.887 of 1999 affirming the judgment and order dated 22.11.1998 passed by the Sub-ordinate Judge (Artha Rin Adalat), Sylhet in Miscellaneous Appeal No.93 of 1996 reversing the judgment and order dated 14.......he judgment and order dated 15.01.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.887 of 1999 affirming the judgment and order dated 22.11.1998 passed by the Sub-ordinate Judge (Artha Rin Adalat), Sylhet in Miscellaneous Appeal No.93 of 1996 reversing the judgment and order dated 14.09.1......CJ Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Mohammad Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Md. Shamsul Huda J Suratunnessa and others……………………………….....Appellants Vs. Nurjahab Bibi and others…â..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Agrani Bank, Janna Branch, Manikganj Vs. AFM Emamul Huq, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....Appellant. Memorandum of Appeal from Original Decree No.139 of 1994. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Manikganj in Artha Rin Suit No.34 of 1990. The trial Court d......ant. Memorandum of Appeal from Original Decree No.139 of 1994. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Manikganj in Artha Rin Suit No.34 of 1990. The trial Court dismiss...... Memorandum of Appeal from Original Decree No.139 of 1994. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Artha Rin Adalat and Subordinate Judge, Manikganj in Artha Rin Suit No.34 of 1990. The trial Court dismisses t......…..Appellant Vs. AFM Emamul Huq………………Respondent Judgment January 7, 1998. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred To- Managing Director, Rupali Bank limited and others Vs. Tafazal Hossain and others, 44 DLR (AD) 260. Lawyers Involved: Khondker AM Mohs..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Nur Ayesha Begum, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....93 of 1996. Judgment SM Emdadul J.- The Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 4-11-1995 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.24 of 1993 reversing those dated 7-2-1993 passed by......1996. Judgment SM Emdadul J.- The Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 4-11-1995 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.24 of 1993 reversing those dated 7-2-1993 passed by the F....... Judgment SM Emdadul J.- The Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 4-11-1995 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.24 of 1993 reversing those dated 7-2-1993 passed by the Famil......ul J Md. Nurul Islam………………. Petitioner Vs. Nur Ayesha Begum........... Opposite-Parties Judgment May 31, 2007. Result: The Rule is discharged. The impugned judgment and decree passed by the appellate Court is upheld with modification. Lawyers Involved: No one..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Begum Shirin Akhtar Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ing Finance Corporation Vs. Jahan Ara Akhter, 49 DLR (AD) 80 wherein it has been settled that the Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation is not at all a financial institution within meaning of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 and also 2003 but Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation has been ......nance Corporation Vs. Jahan Ara Akhter, 49 DLR (AD) 80 wherein it has been settled that the Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation is not at all a financial institution within meaning of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 and also 2003 but Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation has been incorp......e Corporation Vs. Jahan Ara Akhter, 49 DLR (AD) 80 wherein it has been settled that the Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation is not at all a financial institution within meaning of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 and also 2003 but Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation has been incorporat......vil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Sharif Uddin Chaklader J Md. Shawkat Hossain J Begum Shirin Akhtar.................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation and others...............Opposite Party Judgment June 7, 2010. Result: Cases Referred t..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 198
James D. Sarker Vs. Rajshahi Krishi Unnayan Bank, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....ent Muhammad Ansar Ali J.- This First Miscellaneous Appeal at the instance of the defendant-Âappellant is directed against an order dated 26.1,91 passed by Mr. Md. Abdus Samad, Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Mortgage Suit No.259 of 1991 allowing an application of the plaintiff ...... Muhammad Ansar Ali J.- This First Miscellaneous Appeal at the instance of the defendant-Âappellant is directed against an order dated 26.1,91 passed by Mr. Md. Abdus Samad, Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Mortgage Suit No.259 of 1991 allowing an application of the plaintiff under ......ammad Ansar Ali J.- This First Miscellaneous Appeal at the instance of the defendant-Âappellant is directed against an order dated 26.1,91 passed by Mr. Md. Abdus Samad, Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Rajshahi in Mortgage Suit No.259 of 1991 allowing an application of the plaintiff under Orde......Bank…………...Respondent Judgment July 21, 1992. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Hori Mia Vs. State, 10 DLR 123; 3 QBD page 1; ILR 40 Cal 21 (PC); Jyotish Chandra Chakravarty Vs. Hem Chandra Roy & another, 11 DLR 7; Abdur Rahman Vs. Muhammad Sharif &..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Abdul Haque Vs. Monija Khatun and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....resence of the conÂtesting parties in the Court in person or by their respective pleaders. The provision of section 89A(1) of Code of Civil Procedure runs as follows: "Except in a suit under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (Act No.4 of 1990), after filÂing of written statement, if all the conte......e of the conÂtesting parties in the Court in person or by their respective pleaders. The provision of section 89A(1) of Code of Civil Procedure runs as follows: "Except in a suit under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (Act No.4 of 1990), after filÂing of written statement, if all the contesting ...... the conÂtesting parties in the Court in person or by their respective pleaders. The provision of section 89A(1) of Code of Civil Procedure runs as follows: "Except in a suit under the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 (Act No.4 of 1990), after filÂing of written statement, if all the contesting part......ourt Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Faruque Ahmed J Obaidul Hassan J Abdul Haque…………………………………..Defendant-Appellant Vs. Monija Khatun and others………………………………………Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment May 29, ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 227
....ot arbitrarily.
In the result, this Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs.
Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.- I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 122.
......50,000 shares which Is only 15.4% of the total shares of the comÂpany. The respondent has further alleged that since respondent No.2 could not verify the claim made by Agrani Bank. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Shangstha and the petitioners their compensation in respect of the shares could not be given The......ot arbitrarily.
In the result, this Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs.
Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.- I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 122.
......o Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 122.
..
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Cyma Zarrar Vs. Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....efendant No.3 (petitioner herein) under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (shortly, the Code) against the judgment and order dated 23-4-2009 passed by the learned Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Artha Rin Case No.107 of 1995 rejecting the application dated 23-4-2......nt No.3 (petitioner herein) under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (shortly, the Code) against the judgment and order dated 23-4-2009 passed by the learned Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Artha Rin Case No.107 of 1995 rejecting the application dated 23-4-2009 un......o.3 (petitioner herein) under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (shortly, the Code) against the judgment and order dated 23-4-2009 passed by the learned Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka in Artha Rin Case No.107 of 1995 rejecting the application dated 23-4-2009 under ...... Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J ABM Hassan J Cyma Zarrar……………………………Petitioners Vs. Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited and others……………………………Opposite parties Judgment August 2, 2010. Result..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Dr. Md. Rahmat Ali Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....er is discharged from his bail bond. Send down the lower Courts record and a copy of the judgment and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 452. ......er is discharged from his bail bond. Send down the lower Courts record and a copy of the judgment and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 452. ......sallowing the appeal and affirming the judgment and order of conÂviction and sentence dated 30-4-2007 passed by the learned Magistrate, 1st Class and Ain Sringkhala Bighnakari Aporadh (Druto Bichar) Adalat, DinajÂpur in Hakimpur PS case No.5, dated 13-3-2007 should not be set aside and or such oth......or the State. Criminal Revision No.1062 of 2007. Judgment Salma Masud Chowdhury J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur, to show cause as to why the judgment and order Dated 12-8-2007 passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Dinajpur in Criminal Appeal ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Haripada Mandal Vs. Bidhan Chandra Mondal, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....mptor-first opposite party having felt aggrieved of judgment dated 2‑2‑1999 carried an appeal being Miscellaneous Appeal No.5 of 1999 before District Judge, Kushtia. Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia heard appeal and by Judgment dated 2‑11‑1999 allowed it and restored C......first opposite party having felt aggrieved of judgment dated 2‑2‑1999 carried an appeal being Miscellaneous Appeal No.5 of 1999 before District Judge, Kushtia. Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia heard appeal and by Judgment dated 2‑11‑1999 allowed it and restored Case No......t opposite party having felt aggrieved of judgment dated 2‑2‑1999 carried an appeal being Miscellaneous Appeal No.5 of 1999 before District Judge, Kushtia. Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia heard appeal and by Judgment dated 2‑11‑1999 allowed it and restored Case No.5 o......ourt concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 515...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Nurul Abser Chowdhury Vs. Jesmin Akther, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... been called in question whereupon Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Party No.1 to show cause as to why the Judgment and decree dated 9-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-cum Third Artha Rin Adalat, Sadar, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.38 of 1997 affirming those dated 16-2-97 pas......called in question whereupon Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Party No.1 to show cause as to why the Judgment and decree dated 9-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-cum Third Artha Rin Adalat, Sadar, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.38 of 1997 affirming those dated 16-2-97 passed by......ed in question whereupon Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Party No.1 to show cause as to why the Judgment and decree dated 9-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-cum Third Artha Rin Adalat, Sadar, Chittagong in Family Appeal No.38 of 1997 affirming those dated 16-2-97 passed by the......rocedure, the propriety of the concurrent decision of the Courts below have been called in question whereupon Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Party No.1 to show cause as to why the Judgment and decree dated 9-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-cum Third Artha Rin Adalat, Sadar, ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Ayat Steels Limited Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....facilities advanced by the responÂdent Bank but eventually the loan was not repaid by the borrower as a result Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited (herein after referred to as respondent bank) instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No.29 of 2005 for realization of loan amount of Tk. 51,73,81735.02 before the ......39); M Subramanian Vs. MLBM Lutchman, AIR 1923 PC 50 (53); Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Usman Sons Ltd., PLD 1969 Karachi 123 (125, 126, 135, 136 para 13 and page 140 para 18); Al-Baraka Bank Vs. Rina Alam, 56 DLR 588; Dacca Match Factory Vs. Bangladesh Match Factory Co., 30 DLR 244; Nasir Mia V...... advanced by the responÂdent Bank but eventually the loan was not repaid by the borrower as a result Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited (herein after referred to as respondent bank) instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No.29 of 2005 for realization of loan amount of Tk. 51,73,81735.02 before the Artha Rin ...... 2011. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- PT Krishnaswami Ayyangar Vs. Chevula Kamalamma, AIR 1941 PC 90 (92); (Obla) Sundarachriar Vs. Narayan Ayyar, AIR 1931 PC 36 (38 and 39); M Subramanian Vs. MLBM Lutchman, AIR 1923 PC 50 (53); Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Usma..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 235
Uttara Jute Fibres Industries and another Vs. Ashraf Jute Mills Ltd., 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... the jute, jute goods, spare parts, etc. pledged with the Rupali Bank are concerned, the Official Liquidator will take necessary steps. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 452.......Jute Fibres Industries…………………………….Appellant Vs. Ashraf Jute Mills Ltd……………………………….…Respondent (Company Appeal No.12 of 1991) Bangladesh Shilpa Rin sangstha………………………..Appellant Vs. Ashraf Jute Mills Ltd………………...... the jute, jute goods, spare parts, etc. pledged with the Rupali Bank are concerned, the Official Liquidator will take necessary steps. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 452....... Result: Both the appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Food Controller Vs. Cork, 1923 AC 647; Kennedy 1896(1) Ch. Division 762; 1897 AC 80; 1895 to 99 All ER (reprint) 408; MK Ranganathan and another Vs. Govt. of Madras and others, AIR 1955(SC) 604; Buldeo Narain Singh Vs. United Indian ..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 317
Motiur Rahman Vs. AKM Shamsul Alamin and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....s Appeal No.76 of 1997 is hereby maintained. Send down the LCR along with copies of this Judgment to the Courts below immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 449. ......s Appeal No.76 of 1997 is hereby maintained. Send down the LCR along with copies of this Judgment to the Courts below immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 449. ...... passed as this Court may deem fit and proper. 2. By the same Rule issuing order dated 10-11-1999, operation of the Judgment and decree dated 10-4-1995 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Arbitration Adalat, Dhaka in Title Suit No.106 of 1992 was stayed. 3. The necessary facts for disposal of the......R (HCD) (2010) 449. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Trade Multi Plex and another Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....upreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafar Siddique J Trade Multi Plex and another.....................Petitioners Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and another………………………….Respondents Judgment August 24, 201...... Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafar Siddique J Trade Multi Plex and another.....................Petitioners Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and another………………………….Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. ......rt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafar Siddique J Trade Multi Plex and another.....................Petitioners Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and another………………………….Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. Resu......s Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 533...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Afifa Sultana Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
..... ......reme Court High Court Division (Special original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafor Siddique J Afifa Sultana……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment January 9, 2011. Resul...... Court High Court Division (Special original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafor Siddique J Afifa Sultana……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment January 9, 2011. Result: ...... High Court Division (Special original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J Md. Abu Zafor Siddique J Afifa Sultana……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others………………………Respondents Judgment January 9, 2011. Result: The r..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 269
77127703770076897688768276477619760275927588757975417537747474727375734473437327