Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2581-2600 of 6261 results.
Bangladesh Steamer Agent's Association Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
.... 6. The appellant unsuccessfully challenged the said order dated 16.9.78 by an application under Article 102 of the Constitution. The DiÂvision Bench of the High Court Division while discharging the Rule issued earlier held that the appellant did not acquire any vested right to run the LMD business......Vs. Govt. of East Pakistan, (1965) 17 DLR (SC) 209; PLD 1964 SC 673; Abdur Rahman Vs. Collector and Deputy commissioner, (1964) 16 DLR (SC) 461; Eidge Vs. Baldwin and others, (1963) 2 All R.R. 66. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, with Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocates, Md. Khalilur Rah..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 208
....dditional Sessions Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No.419 of 2004 the accused respondent Nos.1 to 3 preÂferred Criminal Revision No.454 of 2008 before the High Court Division and obtained Rule. By the impugned judgment and order the High Court Division made the Rule absolute selling asid......
Saleha Khatton and others......................................................Respondents
Order
November 21, 2011.
Result:
Leave is granted.
Case Referred to-
43 DLR (AD) 128.
Lawyers Involved:
Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate instructed by Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record—F..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 163
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Majid, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
....Not represented. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.2326 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 19.04.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2789 of 2002 with Civil Rule No.110 (Con) of 1999). Order Syed Mahmud Hossain J.- This civil petiÂtion for leave to a...... Vs. Abdul Majid being dead his heirs:Mizanur Rahman (Minor) and others............................................Respondents Order February 27, 2012. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Mondal, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
IFIC Bank Ltd. Vs. Eknabin & Co. and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....td…………………………………….........Petitioner Vs. Eknabin & Co. and others ..............................Opposite-Parties Judgment August 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- BHBFC Vs. Shahid Sarwar Abu Hossain, 9 BLT 289=6 BLC......gust 12, 2010. Result: The Rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- BHBFC Vs. Shahid Sarwar Abu Hossain, 9 BLT 289=6 BLC 751; BHBFC Vs. Jahanara Begum, 16 BLD (AD) 231=49 DLR (AD) 80. Lawyers Involved: AQM Safiullah, Advocate—For the Petitioner. No one appears—For the Oppos..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Abeda Chowdhury Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....an Khan J Abeda Chowdhury..................................Petitioner Vs. State and another.................................Opposite Parties Judgment October 29, 2009 Result: The Rule is discharged and the proceedings in Metropolitan Sessions case should not be quashed. Cases...... Metropolitan Sessions case should not be quashed. Cases Referred to- Nizamuddin Mahmood Vs. Abdul Hamid Bhuiyan, 60 DLR (AD) 195; Ali Akkas Vs. Enayet Hossain, 17 BLD (AD) 44=2 BLC (AD) 16. Lawyers Involved: AKM Asihful Haque, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Towhida Khatoon, Assistant..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Rowshena Jahan Vs. State and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....Rowshena Jahan………………………………….Petitioner Vs. State and another……………………………….Opposite-Parties Judgment September 30, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Nargis Begum, 62 DLR (AD......, 62 DLR (AD) 225; Habibur Rahman Mollah Vs. State, 62 DLR (AD) 233; Ali Akkas Vs. Enayet Hossain, 17 BLD (AD) 44; Abdul Quader Chowdhury Vs. State, 28 DLR (AD) 38; 62 DLR (AD) 279; 60 DLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Khandaker Reza-e-Raquib with Imratul Kabir and Majbahur Rahman, Advocates-For t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Buxly Paints (BangÂladesh) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....f 1977 (From judgment of a Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.23 of 1973). Judgment Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya.- This appeal by speÂcial leave is against adischarging a Rule issued upon an application under Article 102 of the Constitution made by the appellant. 2. T......zle Munim J Buxly Paints (BangÂladesh) Ltd……………...Appellant Vs. Bangladesh…………………Respondent Judgment August 19, 1977. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-record - For the Appellant. Sultan, Hossain Khan, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
....d the dismissal order that was passed on 26.11.73 giving retrosÂpective effect from the date of suspension cannot be said to have been passed without lawful authority. In this view of the matter the Rule was discharged.
5. Leave was granted in the following terms:—
(i) In view of the P.O. 1...........Appellant
Vs.
Secretary, Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Establishment Division & ors……………..Respondents
Judgment
February 6, 1979.
Result:
The appeal is allowed.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam Advocate with him instructe..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Bangladesh Biman CorpoÂration Vs. Chowdhury Mohammad Yusuf and another, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....the services of the Respondents have been made without lawful authority and are of no legal effect. Leave was granted to consider following points amongst others:— (1) Whether the PIA Service Rules come into play for governing the relationship beÂtween the petitioner and the respondents in ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Respondents (In Appeal No.25 of 1979) Judgment May 4, 1979. Result: The appeals are dismissed. Case Referred To- B.S.I. Corporation Vs. Mahbub Hossain, 29 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, with A.R. Yusuf, M. Zahir, Advocates, instructed by ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 123
New India Tea Company Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....al is accordingly allowed in part, the order of the High Court set aside, and the Writ Petition dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 303....... India Tea Company Ltd…………………Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others……………………Respondent Judgment August 17, 1977. Result: The appeal is allowed in part. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Abdur Rab, Advocate-on-Record - For t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
....he process of acquisition recommenced in the year 1965. Accordingly, all further proceeding of the LA Case was fully in accordance with law.
4. The facts of the case relevant for disposal of these Rules, in brief, are that the property conÂcerned in WP No.8065 of 2006 is within Touzi No.1242 und......esult:
The rules are discharge.
Cases Referred to-
Bangladesh Sangbadpatra Parishad (BSP) Vs. Bangladesh, 43 DLR (AD) 126; Bangladesh Vs. Nawab Abdul Malik Jute Mills Ltd., 60 DLR (AD) 7.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate with Abdul Mazed Mia. Advocate and Md. Rezaul Karim, A..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Md. Jalal Hossain Mollah Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
....tle Appeal No.226 of 1990 are collusive, fraudulent and not binding upon the plaintiff. The present respondent Nos.1 and 2, as defendants, appeared in that suit and filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for rejection of the plaint. The learned Assistant Ju............................................Petitioner Vs. Md. Azizur Rahman and others..................................Respondents Order February 19, 2012. Result: Leave is granted. Lawyers Involved: Faruque Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Recordâ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
M. A. Razzaque Vs. Syed Maynul Haq and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
.... present petitioner against the order No.188 dated 27.02.2006 passed in Title Suit No.218 of 2003 of the Court of Joint District Judge, Additional Court, Dhaka rejecting an application under Order 17 Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by this present petitioner praying for dismissal of t...................................Petitioner Vs. Syed Maynul Haq and others..................................Respondents Judgment February 2, 2012. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ali Akanda, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-R..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Khorshed Ali Talukder, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
.... That while he was serving as Principal of Gaibanda Training Institute from 09.09.1997 in current charge the authority framed a charge against him on 20.09.2001 on the allegations of corruption under Rule 3(b) and 3(d) of the Government Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1985. The petitioner ......shed Ali Talukder...........................................Respondent Judgment March 1, 2012. Result: The allegations against the respondent-petitioner should be enquired into afresh. Lawyers Involved: Karunamoy Chakma, Deputy Attorney General instructed by Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Adv..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 263
Sabu Tara Begum and others Vs. Manik Miah and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
....urt Division, therefore, calls for no interference by this Division. In the result, this civil petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 ADC (2012) 403. ......................Petitioners Vs. Manik Miah and others...................................................Respondents Judgment February 26, 2012. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: N. I. Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Zainul Abedin, Advo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Md. Hasanul Islam Hanif @ Galcuta Hanif Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... J Md. Hasanul Islam Hanif @ Galcuta Hanif.................................petitioner Vs. The State........................Opposite party Judgment January 26, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Zillur Rahman alias Zillur Vs. The State, 6 BLC (20......) 514; Habibur Rahman alias Jane Alam Vs. The State, 47 DLR (1995) (HCD) 323; Mohiuddin Vs. The State, 61 DLR (2009) (HCD) 35; Abdul Haider Sikder and another Vs. The State, 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 95. Lawyers Involved: A.B.M. Waliur Rahman Khan, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Kazi M. Ejarul Ha..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Kartick Chandra Mandal & others Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....conclude trial within the time specified, the provision of section 339C of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1998, section 6A of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958 and rule 19Ka of the Emergency Power Rules, 2007, is directory and not mandatory" in the case reported in 14 MLR (AD) 2009, page 5 betwee...... 41 DLR 387; Mostofa Kamal alias Lotus Kamal Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 14 MLR (AD) (2009) 5=61 DLR (AD) (2009) 10; Kahar Singh Vs. The State of Horyana, 1972 (SC) Cr. R.20: AIR 1971, (SC) 983. Lawyers Involved: Tapan Kumar Bapari, Advocate - For the petitioner. K.M Masud Rumy, Assistant..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 143
Mofazzal Hossain Chowdhury Maya Vs. The State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....se No.144 of 2007 of the Court of Senior Special Judge and Metropolitan Session Judge, Dhaka convicting the convict appellant under section 26(2) of the Anti-Corruption Commission Act, 2004 read with Rule 15(Gha) of the Jaruri Khamata Bidimala, 2007 and sentencing him to suffer simple imprisonment f......State.......................Respondent Judgment October 27, 2010. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. M.K. Alamgir, 62 DLR (AD) 290. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Baset Majumder with M. Sayed Ahmed, Advocates - For the Appellant. Md...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 133
A.K. Azad Vs. Fakruddin and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Delwar Hossain J A K Azad................................Petitioner Vs. Fakruddin and another.......................Opposite parties Judgment October 15, 2009. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Kumudini Welfare Trust Vs. Pakistan, 11 DLR 57; Jadunan......, 11 DLR 57; Jadunandan Gope Vs. Syed Nazmtizzaman, AIR 1957 Patna 560; Ram Pravesh Singh Vs. Maneshwari Prashad Narain Deo, AIR 1958 Patna 129; Rahmat Ali Vs. Banares Silk Industries, 19 DLR 287. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocate with him Md. Asaduzzaman, Advocate - For the Petiti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
....
(Arising out of the Judgment and decree dated 21.7.1998 and 28.7.1998 respectively passed by the District Judge, Gazipur in Title Appeal No.63 of 1987.)
Judgment
Abu Bakar Siddiquee J.- This Rule was issued upon an application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure calling upon......site parties
Judgment
July 27, 2010.
Result:
The rule is discharged.
Cases Referred to-
Sheikh Salimuddin Vs. Ataur Rahman, 43 DLR 18; Ajufannessa Vs. Safar Miah, 30 DLR (SC) 41.
Lawyers Involved:
None appears - For the petitioner.
Dr. Md. Bashir Ullah, Assistant Attorney ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
69276924692169206919691869176915691369126911691069096908690769066905690469026901