Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2641-2644 of 2644 results.
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r activities of the contemner-appellant and again wrote to the contemner-appellant No. 1 stating that he is appointed Chairman for the purpose of holding the AGM of the Bank for the years in question prior to the amendment came into operation and requested them to publish and notify the date for hol......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s endorsed by the Ministry of Finance as aforesaid. Moreover, the appellant was not favoured with the promotion to the post of Commissioner of Taxes though the same could be given showing him as such prior to his going to L.P.R. on 30.12.1996 in order avoid any financial complications. 15. Mr. M......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......udassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others………………………………………………….Respon..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......y it was contended that the suit so filed was barred by law. 4. The trial Court decreed the suit declaring that defendant Nos. 1 and 2 i.e. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land and the Directorate of Housing and Settlement, represented by the Director, Housing..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......n J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others ...............Respondents Result: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
324307303297