Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 2661-2667 of 2667 results.

Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ...... August 14, 2004.  The Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860), Section 324   In course of quarrel, two of the accuseds caught hold of the victim and took him out to the courtyard. The appellant assaulted the victim at the head with a piece of s......vision  (Criminal)  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J  Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent.  Judgment August 14, 2004.  ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95

National Board of Revenue and oth­ers Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)

....ith reference to the relevant pro­visions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant pro­visions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......lso Reported in: ......late Division  Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J  National Board of Revenue and oth­ers...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: ..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130

M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order.  For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. ...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order.  For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.  Ed. ......pellate Division   (Civil)  Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J  M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, G......p; Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J  M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bang..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229

Abdul Malek and oth­ers Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

...., felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judg­ment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accord­ingly dismissed without any order as to cost.  Ed. ......ssion of the same. The lands of khatians No. 95,96,97,98 and 99 were the lands of Sreepur Mouza of Khatian No. 93. The land of Khatian No. 93 was settled with Asaduzzaman Miah by a patta from Serajul Hoque Muktair on 15th Kartick 1291 B.S. and this Asaduzzaman Mia was possessing the same. The rent o...... is accord­ingly dismissed without any order as to cost.  Ed. ......y order as to cost.  Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73

Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ind merit in the appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is allowed.  There is no order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ind merit in the appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is allowed.  There is no order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents   Judgment March 12, 2005. The Constitutio......  Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, Dhaka..........Appellant. Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others.... Respondents   Judgment March 12, 200..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Criminal)  Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents  Judgment June 27, ......riminal)  Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.  Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, United Commercial Bank Ltd and another ....Appellants. Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury.... Respondents  Judgment June 27, 2005   Lawyers Inv..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118

Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......lso Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......mad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others………………………………………………….Respondents Judgment May ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nurul Hoque Miah……………………....Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and othersâ€..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162