Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2701-2720 of 3180 results.
Radha Krishna Jogani (Agarwalla) Vs. Dwarka Das Agarawalla & others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....Jessore passed in First Appeal No. 6 of 1980 on 15 March, 1983. 2. Appellant who is the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 62 of 1973 for declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit property as well as the cinema shall along with its structures and business. Averments made in the...... Partnership Act, 1932 (IX of 1932) Section 69 (1)(2)(3) The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order 6, rule 17 If a partner of an unregistered firm can maintain a suit for dissolution and accounts, his prayer for declaration of his share may as well be tried prior to dissolving the f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Santosh Kumar Chakraborty & others Vs. M.A. Motaleb Hossain and others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....10 May 1974 in connection with a Mutation Case filed by them in which the plaintiff filed an objection stating that be had filed the suit for specific performance of contract in respect of the same property. The trial Court on consideration of evidence of 3 witnesses for the defendants and 10 witn......A Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Santosh Kumar Chakraborty & others....................... Appellant Vs. M.A. Motaleb Hossain and others..............................Respondent Judgment April 25, 1984. Result: Tt..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Md. Joynal and ors. Vs. Md. Rustam Ali Mia & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....ange of lands and accordingly litigations were withdrawn. The suit is liable to be dismissed. 5. The trial court noticed that there were "litigation between the parties” over the property which admittedly belonged to Haji Mohan Ali and Abdul Hoque. Both sides placed before the...... (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Mohammad Mohsen Ali J Md. Joynal and ors................................Appellants Vs. Md. Rustam Ali Mia & ors..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Geeta Rani alias Shamima Khatun Vs. Bangladesh, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....a Rani Dasi received a notice under section 92 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act from the Deputy Commissioner, Rangpur as to why the land in question should not be treated as abandoned property and the Government of Bangladesh would not enter into the khas possession on the deat......rn in the womb of Gouri Dasi could only be denied by Gouri Dasi herself on the event of Geta Rani claiming herself as her daughter. Gouri Dasi treated Geta Rani as her daughter during her life time and now it is too late for any body else to challenge this fact. Provisions of section 92(a) have ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Mehar Khatun and ors. Vs. Sarat Kumar Kanungoe, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... embodied in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. Section 53A reads as under: "53A. Where any person contracts to transfer for consideration any immovable property by writing signed by him or on his behalf from which the terms necessary to constitute th...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J S. M. Mohsen Ali J Mehar Khatun and ors............................... Appellants Vs. Sarat Kumar Kanungoe…..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Moulvi Abdulla Welfare Trust Vs. K.A. Gani, Advocate & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... The Code Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Or. 40, r. 1 (a), (c) and (d) and r. 4. Receiver is an officer of the Court to whom is given possession of custody and management of certain property. The received is the custodian of the property, he is liable to render account to the Cour.......A. Gani, Advocate & ors …..............................Respondents Judgment January 11, 1984. The Code Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Or. 40, r. 1 (a), (c) and (d) and r. 4. Receiver is an officer of the Court to whom is given possession of custody..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Golam Ather Chowdhury Vs. The Administrator of Waqfs and others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... examined some witnesses, heard both the parties and by the impugned order dated 31 March 1983, appointed a Committee of five persons including the appellant to administer and manage the waqf property, under section 44 of the Waqfs Ordinance. Appellant (existing mutawalli) was made Chairman......J Golam Ather Chowdhury……...........................Appellant Vs. The Administrator of Waqfs and others............Respondents Judgment April 2, 1984. The Waqf Ordinanc..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 196
Basiruddin Ahmed & others Vs. Dhirendra Mohan Das & others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....owed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (AD) (1984) 191. ......ndents Judgment November 9, 1983. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 1963 (XX of 1963), Section 19 (2) Deposit of rent in favour of the previous landlord became totally irrelevant as soon as that landlord ceased to have any interest in the suit p..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 166
Kad Banu & others Vs. Hajera Khatun and others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....ssed, has had an opportunity of obeying the decree and has willfully failed to obey it. the decree may be enforced (in the case of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by the attachment of his property or, in the case of a decree for the specific performance of a contract or for an injunc......Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md Mohsen Ali J Kad Banu & others......................................... Appellants Vs. Hajera Khatun and others................................ Respondents Judgment December 13, 1983. The C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Md. Mahmudul Haque @ Muhammadul Haque Vs. Md. Shamsul Alam, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....ion of the Head Office of the said Company the petitioner advised the respondent that he had been found guilty of misconduct, of dishonesty in connection with the said Company's business and property under section 17(3) (b) of Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 and dismiss...... a Court with jurisdiction which is not given by law……………….(4) The matter fell between the concurrent jurisdiction of the Labour Court, Rajshahi and the Labour Court, Chittagong and the law says that exclusive jurisdiction in such case lay wit..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Ghaus-i-Pak-i-Azam Welfare Trust, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....s carried on “in the course of the carrying out of a religious or charitable purpose of the institution.”……….(2) As per amendment of 1973 all income from any property whether business or not, if held in trust, is totally exempted from income tax. The Impug......rom income tax. The Impugned assessment being prior to the amendment, the exemption is not available to the respondent. The Decision of the High Court Division granting such exemption is set aside and that of the Tribunal refusing any exemption is restored…………..(13 an..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Abdul Gafur Khan & others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....visions of sections 23 and 24 and sub-section (2) of section 35 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so far as the same can be made applicable: Provided that—(i) the market value of any immovable property for the purpose of this section shall be the weighted average value of the properties of ......XIII of 1948), Section 3 Notice was served in 1962 but acquisition was made in 1968. So the compensation to be paid now on the valuation of the year 1962 would cause substantial injury to the land owner. There should be some proximity between the date of notice for acquisition and that of act..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Paresh Chandra Bhowmick Vs. Hiralal Nath & others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....t of testamentary disposition is associated with preferring some heirs to others, causing deprivation to one for the benefit of another and if the testator, who got absolute right to dispose of his property by will under the Hindu Law, of his own volition and in perfect sense causes such deprivat...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Paresh Chandra Bhowmick……….....................................Appellant Vs. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Abdul Huque Vs. Mrs. Zainab Begum & ors, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....e Judge, 5th Court for disposal. On 10.2.78 an application under Order 39 rule 2(3) of the Code was filed for drawing up the proceeding against the appellant and also prayed for attachment of their property. This petition was marked as Miscellaneous Case No. 9 of 1978. The learned Subordinate Jud...... December 4, 1983. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 150 Consequence of Transfer of Business of Court The transferred Court shall have the same power and “shall perform the same duty as those respectively conferred and imposed by order under t..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 93
M/s. Gannysons Ltd. & another Vs. Sonali Bank & others., 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....ent August 3, 1983. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management & Disposal) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 16 of 1972), Article 14 Under section 14(1) any property vested in the Government shall be exempted from all legal process including seizure, distr..............Appellants Vs. Sonali Bank & ors.........................................................Respondents Judgment August 3, 1983. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management & Disposal) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 16 of 1972..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Asaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....ualifications or restrictions which can be imposed in the public interest or for public purpose recognized such right…………….(12) Right to specific performance of contract for sale of any property is a right relating to property. It must, therefore, receive protection in the absence of a......ant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Works & Urban Development …….......................Respondent Judgment May 4, 1983. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (P.O. 16 of 1972), Article 10 Ri..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury & another Vs. Baktear Ahmed Chowdhury & other, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
........Respondents Judgment June 14, 1983. The provision for the appointment of a receiver is to be considered as one of the harshest remedies for the enforcement of rights to property. It should, therefore, be exercised only in extreme cases. Where there is not merely ......d, therefore, be exercised only in extreme cases. Where there is not merely apprehension of possible danger but the peril or danger to the property in question appears to be great and imminent, such appointment may be made………….(13) There is no ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Md. Matiur Rahman Vs. Asgar Ali & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....he offence complained of and the offence (if any) proved, and in case coming under clause (d), clause (e), clause (f) or clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 260 the value of the property in respect of which the offence has been committed: (g) the ..................Appellant Vs. Asgar Ali & ors……….....................……Respondents Judgment October 19, 1983. Sections 263 and 264 of the Code of Criminal Procedure do not contemplate that reasoning should be given in case..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Darasatullah and ors. Vs. Manik Mondal and ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....it. 4. The defendants' case is that the suit land belonged to Nafar Roy who died leaving 2 sons, Basu and Suvia Roy, and that Basu died leaving Suvia Roy as brother who got the entire suit property along with other lands and thereafter Suvia Roy exchanged the suit properties along with h...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim C J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Darasatullah and others...............................Appellant Vs. Manik Mondal and others......Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
BD Inland Water Transport Corpn Vs. M/s. Seres Shipping Incorporated & ors., 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... "8. No action shall be maintainable to enforce any claim or lien against a vessel or her owners in respect of any damage or loss to another Vessel, her charge or freight, or any property on board her, or damage for loss of life or personal injuries suffered by any person on...... (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Corporation……………..........................Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 204
18471846184518431841184018391837183518341832183118301829182718251823182118201819