Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 2721-2740 of 3033 results.
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......ssity of referring to all of from the cited decisions, we find that the preponderance of the judicial opinion that the presumption of correctness arising from the record of right under s. 103B of the Bengal Tenancy Act raises a presumption of Possession in favour of person whose name is recorded the...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ......the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......……. Respondents Judgment Aug. 4, 1975. Cases referred to: Gajraj Sheokarandas Vs. Hukam Chand Sarupchand AIR 1939 Bombay 90; Province of West Bengal and the Province of East Bengal Vs. Banamali Sen 54 C.W.N. 322, S. B. Das Vs. Motiba Chetty......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the proceeding in D.A.B.C. R. Case No. 53 of 1968 pending against the appellants in the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chittagong (North). 2. The prosecution case is that the appellants 1 and 2 of appeal No. 28 are partners of a......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....d tear for neglect, even though for several years coming such expenditure would not be necessary. New Shorrock Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay, North, 1956 (30) I.T.R. 338. In this case, the assessee replaced after sixty years looms which are ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Matilal Sikder & ors Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin B Das & ors, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......sh; This appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Single Judge of Dacca High Court setting aside a concurrent order allowing pre-emption by the two courts below under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act and dismissing the application for pre-emption filed by th......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......e that dispute between plaintiff appellant, Golam Hafez Mia, and defendant respondent, Khadem Ali Meah centres round the land belonging to Nalini and his wife Sarala. They left the country for West Bengal in 1962. Their rayati holding fell in arrears of rent which prompted the Government Acquired ......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... (i) and (ii) but does not necessarily involve (iii) and never involves (iv)". 15. As early as 1952, Ibrahim, J. of the Dacca High Court, while considering the provisions of Section 18-C of the Bengal Local Self Government Act, 1885, had to consider whether a District Judge or Sub-Judge deci...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295...Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Nuruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rmination of the excess payment, for the making of a refund order, to such payments or recoveries as had been made after the first day of January, 1939, within the meaning of section 36(1 )(d) of the Bengal Money Lender's Act (Bengal Act X of 1940) (hereinafter called the Act). Having read the direc......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......75) Judgment: K. Hossain J: The petitioner is a dismissed employee of Public Jute Mills Ltd. He was an Office Assistant in the Labour Office of the Company. He was charged on two co..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......: K. Hossain J: The purchasers are the petitioners, and the leave petition arises out of a proceeding for pre-emption under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act. 2. The point in dispute was whether the respondent......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ......e question of law involved is, whether the appellant who is a government officer and therefore a public servant and was on deputation on foreign service basis to serve the Chittaranjan Cotton Mills Ltd., as Administrative Officer and was nominated by the company as a member of the Board of ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......though he has undoubtedly a right to participate in the profits, if and when the company decides to divide them. The interest of a share-holder vis-a-vis, the company was explained in the 'Sholapur Mills Case Charanjit Lai vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1951 S.C. 41 at pp. 54, 55 (B). That judgment ne..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Haji Abdul Motalib Sowdagar Vs. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......omply with and that the decree has become infructuous. It is not necessary for the disposal of this petition to decide whether in view of the definition of "premises" as given in section 2(6) of East Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1953, which means any building or part of the building or any hurt......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ......ejecting civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 141 of 1975. The Courts below were right in rejecting the petitioner's plea. There is no substance in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Nurun Nabi Mondal and others Vs. Joynal Abedin Khondkar & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; ...... The learned Chief Justice has added that on the principle of 'Stare decisis' also they would hesitate to disturb the view of the law which seems to have held the field for a long time in Bengal. This view of the Division Bench was followed by a Single Judge of Dacca High Co......nbsp; ......y MalakaV Vs. Narendra Chandra Barman, (1952) 4 DLR 492; Rabia Kharun Vs. Mahendra Chandra Mondal (1960) U DLR 634 ; Debt Prasad Chow-dhary Vs. Gopal Bhagat, ILR 40 Cal. 721 (771); (M's. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, (1977) 39 DLR (SC) 85; Powell Vs. Kernpton Park Race Course Company..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Bangladesh Vs. M/s. Sree Kundeswari Aushadhalaya, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......he consideration is the vires of a Notification dated 19th December, 1974 issued by the Ministry of Finance (National Board of Revenue) amending rule 15 of the Rules framed under section 86(2) of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909 (Bengal Act IV of 1909). These Rules originally were framed on August 12, 19......uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ......stion for consideration can be reframed as, what will be the law for the assessment of compensation for lands acquired either under s. 93A of the Town Improvement Act or under section 5 of the East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act (hereinafter referred to as the Requisitio......he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ......he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
949947946945944941940939938937936934932930926923919918916913