Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Tara Mia and another Vs. Babru Mia and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... LG (2007) AD 231. ....... 3-4 and widow defendant No. 5 and that by way of devolution and inheritance defendant Nos. 1 and 2 got 2 pons 16 gandas each and defendant No. 5 got 1 pon 3 gandas 3 Karas and 2 kranti in the suit property and they were in ejmali possession with defendant Nos. 6 to 13 and that Ustari Bibi w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Md. Ohidul Islam and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ohidul Islam and others…………………………Petitioner......ndent No. 2 should not be declared to have been made without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect, or such other order or further or orders be passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. Pending hearing of the Rule, let the respondents are directed to redeploy the Ansars in &l..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Sheikh Intaz Ali and others Vs. Solaiman Tarafder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....: V ADC (2008) 420. ...... allowing the Miscellaneous Case arrived at the finding that the summons by registered post was not served on the defendants and that the summons shown to have been served on the defendants was not proper service on all the defendants and that plaintiffs obtained the ex parte decree on the basis ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Alauddin Vs. Azizul Hussain and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ivil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Alauddin...........................Petitioner Vs. Azizul Hussain and others........ Respondents Judgment November 6, 2007. Lawyers Involved: ......at he token certified copy of the kabalas and acquired his knowledge of the transfer. Thereafter, he filed the miscellaneous case under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act with the proper deposit of the consideration amount. He claimed that he is in possession of the dispute..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Kulsum Bibi & others Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Magura and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Kulsum Bibi & others...............Petitioners Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Magura and others..................... ............Respondents Judgment &nb......sed in Title Suit No. 48 of 1965 itself, the High Court Division also found that in the schedule of the decree there is no name of the Mouja, Khatian number or plots or any other description of the property and in respect of Title Suit No. 18 of 1974 the High Court Division found that only the o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
RAJUK Vs. Jamuna Builders Ltd. and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha represented by its Chairman and another.............Petitioners Vs. Jamuna Builders Ltd. and another.................... petitioner to stop the construction work and further directed to remove the construction within 7 days and further warned the petitioner to the effect that since the construction is unauthorised proper action will be taken for removing the unauthorised construction under section (sic) of th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Khairunnessa Vs. Syed Mainul Haq and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Khairunnessa........................Petitioner Vs. Syed Mainul Haq and others.................................Respondents Judgment December 8, 2005. ......an application filed under Order I, rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The suit was filed seeking the decree that the defendant No.1 is a licensee of the plaintiff in respect of the property in suit as well as for khas possession of the property described in schedule B to the plai..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Hyder Ali Mia Vs. Razia Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Hyder Ali Mia (Md)..................Appellant Vs. Razia Begum and others.........Respondents Judgment February 8, 2006. Cases Referred to:......ance with the provisions laid down in rule 19B, Order V Code of Civil Procedure and said summons having been returned with the endorsement made by the postal peon as being 'refused', there was also proper service of the summons sent by registered post and therefore, the High Court Di..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Manirunnessa Khanam and another Vs. Syed Madassir Ali and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....so Reported in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 25. ......llenging the order dated 21-5-1982 passed by the Administrator of Waqfs in Enrolment Case No. 22 of 1978 in enrolling 3.57 acres of land as described in schedule of the above enrolment case as waqf property and also for a declaration that the schedule land is not a waqf property on the averments..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 199
Abu Asad Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abu Taher Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rted in: 12 BLC (AD)(2007) 9, 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 61. ......each of trust took the settlement of the land in suit in his own name and later on Firoz Bhuiyan of his own got the SA record prepared in respect of the land taken settlement as well as the ancestral property in equal share, but the case so pleaded was not established by the defendants by leading re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Amjad Ali and anothers Vs. Dud Banu and other, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Amjad Ali and anothers .............Petitioners Vs. Dud Banu and other ................Responde...... the case land by the pre-emptee petitioners and there is also no evidence on record to show that the pre-emptor respondent No. 1 had earlier knowledge of the transfer and both the Courts below, on proper consideration of the evidence on record, concurrently found that the preemption ap..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Md. Babar Ali Vs. Md. Shamsul Alam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Babar Ali……………………………..Petitioner Vs. Md. Shamsul Alam and others .......Respondents Judgment April 16, 2006. Case Referred To- ......r tenants of such land but when a portion or share of non-agricultural land is transferred to a co-sharer in the tenancy, this is protected. 6. As it appears the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record and applying the correct principle of law as a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet ........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Aziz and others……..........Respondents Judgment April 9, 2006. Lawye...... defendant No.5 petitioner failed to produce any evidence in support of their claim that the suit pathway was acquired of B.A.D.C. 6. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record dismissed the revisional application summarily..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Mohammad Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohammad Ali.........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others…….........Respondents Judgment March 13, 2007. Lawye......converted into a permanent 'maliki' settlement but the Single Judge of the High Court Division due to its misconception in law in interpreting deeds has failed to interpret the kabuliyat in a proper way and has decided the fate of the case causing complete miscarriage of justice. He fu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
S.M. Nurul Islam Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J S.M. Nurul Islam……………………Petitioner Vs. Padma Oil Company Limited and others…………….....Respondents Judgment Novembe......rt as well as the lower appellate court, though found that the plaintiff indirectly admitted the misappropriation, held that an enquiry an 2nd show cause were necessary which is not at all proper in view of the fact that the offence of misappropriation has been admitted by the plai..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Md. Shahidur Islam and others Vs. Md. Habibur Rahman and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....DC (2008) 289. ......ect of parties, the suit is filed with an ulterior motive for illegal gain and the plaintiffs have no right, title and interest and possession in the suit land and they further stated that the suit property originally belonged to Badan Mondal, while the plaintiffs were owning and possessing..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Matiar Rahman Vs. Assist Custodian of Enemy Property Lands & Buildings, Bakerganj, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....pellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Matiar Rahman being dead his heirs: Shahajada Hossain Mallik and others..... Appellant Vs. Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property Lands and Buildin......g the judgment and decree dated August 22, 1973 passed in Title Suit No. 634 of 1970 decreeing the same. The suit was filed seeking decree for permanent injunction and for declaration that the property in suit is not enemy property i.e. vested property. 3. The appellant filed Title Su..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Sultan @ Sultan & others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Fazle Munim CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury A.T.M. Masud J Abdur Rahman and others……………………………&......nst the judgment and order of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1122 of 1977. Facts are as follows: The appellants as plaintiffs instituted a suit for partition of the suit property by metes and bounds. It was decreed in preliminary contest on 29.4.1972. Thereafter, the p..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Delwar Hossain Akter & another Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam Khan & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d: Syed Mahbubur Rahmen, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 918 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3794 of 2000). ...... found that the findings of fact on question of possession and dispossession and also on question of limitation as arrived at by the court of appeal which is the final court of facts were based on proper consideration and appreciation of the material evidence on record and there is no ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Wali Miah Sodagor Jame Masjid and Madrasha Vs. Abdul Hoque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....in: V ADC (2008) 234. ......se dated 05.09.2004 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Chatkhil, Noakhali in Title Suit No.43 of 2003 should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 148 of 2003 in the Court of Seni..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35