Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdul Malek and othÂers Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... interfere with the findings of fact if those are based on non reading and misreading of material evidence on record and also could interfere for mis-interpreting exhibit-5 the deed of executed by Ataul Haque Chowdhury in favour of the plaintiff-predecessor Mansur Ahmed a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hters who are defendant Nos.1-4, Asiya Khatun died leaving defendant Nos.5-9 as heirs and defendant Nos.10-16 are claimed to be stranger purchasers. Ayesa Khatun vide kabala dated 30.3.1987 transferred 1 ganda of land to plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 out of her share and gifted rest of her share ......usively for more than twelve years. The plaintiffs had got no right, title and possession in the land of plot No.408. The plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 purchased 1 ganda of land from Iman Ali by a deed of sale dated 13.2.1975 out of said Plot No.408. Municipal holding was created in the name of I..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....re recording of the evidence setting aside the order dated 27.02.2003 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Savar, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 323 of 2002 renumbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 2003 upon its transfer to the Second Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit...... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... any document or to draw and endorse any cheque on the account of the company in any bank or to draw and endorse negotiable instrument or to sign any certificate or share or to direct registration of transfer of any shares shall not be deemed to be included within the substantial powers of managemen......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... much less than claimed by the respondent. 7. The High Court Division considered the judgment and order passed by the court of District Judge as well as considered the registered mortgage deed exhibit-1 by deposit of which equitable mortgage was created and against security of which the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division committed illegality in holding that the point of discord between the parties is whether unregistered deed of sale dated 14.3.1980 produced by Respondent No. 7 is a valid deed of transfer or it resulted in transfer of any right on the face of allegation of creating the deed by ......appellant would be in control of the shop No. 235 (kha). He, in the month of January and February, 1985 paid back Tk. 36,000/- and thereupon the appellant returned the original copy of the mortgage deed, but did not make over possession of the shop. The appellant asked him to wait till disposal ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., in brief, are that one Dr. Abdul Khayrat got lease of the disputed property from the Government on 02.12.1963 who sold the same in favour of his wife Asdeka Khatun on 27.09.1966 and she in her turn transferred the property to one Jainab Khatun by registered deed of sale dated 17.12.1966 and accord......disputed property from the Government on 02.12.1963 who sold the same in favour of his wife Asdeka Khatun on 27.09.1966 and she in her turn transferred the property to one Jainab Khatun by registered deed of sale dated 17.12.1966 and according to the petitioners the aforesaid Jainab Khatun transferr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74