Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 261-280 of 614 results.
Janata Bank Vs. Mohiuddin Specialised Textile, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ent. First Appeal No.293 of 1997. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This appeal by the plaintiffs Bank directed against the Judgment dated 26-1-1997 and decree dated 22-1-1997 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia in Artha Rin Suit No.131 of 1993 decreeing the suit without interest pende...... First Appeal No.293 of 1997. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This appeal by the plaintiffs Bank directed against the Judgment dated 26-1-1997 and decree dated 22-1-1997 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia in Artha Rin Suit No.131 of 1993 decreeing the suit without interest pendent lit......rst Appeal No.293 of 1997. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This appeal by the plaintiffs Bank directed against the Judgment dated 26-1-1997 and decree dated 22-1-1997 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, Kushtia in Artha Rin Suit No.131 of 1993 decreeing the suit without interest pendent lite. ......Mohiuddin Specialised Textile………………Defendant-Respondent Judgment August 18, 2009. Result: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Sonali Bank Vs. Quaderia Publications and Products Limited, 17 BLT (AD) 148; Sonali Bank Vs. Messrs Beg and Beg Jute Incorporated Ltd., 17..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 141
Abdul Quayuam Khan Vs. Abu Yusuf Mridha, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....1040 of 1992. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- This Rule at the instance of the defendant petitioner is directed against judgment and decree dated 27-11-1991 passed by the Subordinate Judge (Artha Rin) Jessore in Title Appeal No. 242 of 1990 affirming those dated 5-8-90 passed by Additional......f 1992. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- This Rule at the instance of the defendant petitioner is directed against judgment and decree dated 27-11-1991 passed by the Subordinate Judge (Artha Rin) Jessore in Title Appeal No. 242 of 1990 affirming those dated 5-8-90 passed by Additional Assis......e date of such information the period of payment of the amount in question should be calculated. Send down the LC records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 386. ......r Vs. Abu Yusuf Mridha………………Opposite Party Judgment November 20, 1997. Result: The Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Case Referred to- Asadunnessa and others Vs. Kamruzzaman and others, 26 DLR 363. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Hossain on behal..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Dr. Md. Asadullah and another Vs. Sonali Bank Ltd. & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... Cases Referred to- Abdul Jalil Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 41 DLR (AD) 109; Korea Bangladesh Food Products Limited Vs. National Bank Limited, 13 MLR 253; Sonali Bank Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 15 MLR (AD) 20; 62 DLR (AD) 231; Md. Nur Islam Vs. Agrani Bank, 1 MLR 373; Jahan A......ses Referred to- Abdul Jalil Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 41 DLR (AD) 109; Korea Bangladesh Food Products Limited Vs. National Bank Limited, 13 MLR 253; Sonali Bank Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 15 MLR (AD) 20; 62 DLR (AD) 231; Md. Nur Islam Vs. Agrani Bank, 1 MLR 373; Jahan Ara Akh......Referred to- Abdul Jalil Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 41 DLR (AD) 109; Korea Bangladesh Food Products Limited Vs. National Bank Limited, 13 MLR 253; Sonali Bank Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 15 MLR (AD) 20; 62 DLR (AD) 231; Md. Nur Islam Vs. Agrani Bank, 1 MLR 373; Jahan Ara Akhtar ...... is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 474. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 156
State Vs. Moksed Ali and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....dditional Sessions Judge, Manikganj immediately. Send down the Lower Court Records at once. Communicate this order forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 346. ......dditional Sessions Judge, Manikganj immediately. Send down the Lower Court Records at once. Communicate this order forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 346. ...... Moksed, Tutul, Nitai alias Sohel (Absconding) were found guilty of attempt to murder under section 307 read with section 34 and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The other two accused persons, Adalat Khan and Mobarak were acquitted. It is noted that of the three said Condemned Prisoners. Tutu....... ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Abdul Jalil Shah and another Vs. Rahima Khatun and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... Civil Revision Case No. 466 of 1996. Judgment Mahfuzur Rahman J.- This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra on 30-11-95 in Partition Suit No.149 of 1993 rejecting the prayer for transp......l Revision Case No. 466 of 1996. Judgment Mahfuzur Rahman J.- This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra on 30-11-95 in Partition Suit No.149 of 1993 rejecting the prayer for transpositio......vision Case No. 466 of 1996. Judgment Mahfuzur Rahman J.- This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra on 30-11-95 in Partition Suit No.149 of 1993 rejecting the prayer for transposition of......is Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 441. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Islamia Automatic Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ainst that order of attachment the petitioner company filed Writ Petition No.3285 of 1996 wherein the impugned orders dated 18‑4‑1996 and 21‑4‑1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat was stayed till disposal of the Rule and the Division Bench also directed the respo...... Islamia Automatic Rice Mills Ltd……………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and others......................Respondents Judgment July 21, 2002. Res...... order of attachment the petitioner company filed Writ Petition No.3285 of 1996 wherein the impugned orders dated 18‑4‑1996 and 21‑4‑1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat was stayed till disposal of the Rule and the Division Bench also directed the respondents to ......utomatic Rice Mills Ltd……………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and others......................Respondents Judgment July 21, 2002. Result: The..Category: Civil Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: | Hits: 417
Nitai Kumar Mondol Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, and another, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....010) 446. ......46. ...... Supreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J SM Ziaul Karim J Nitai Kumar Mondol………………..Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, and another………………..Respondents Judgment November 20, 2008. Result: T...... Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Zinat Ara J SM Ziaul Karim J Nitai Kumar Mondol………………..Petitioner Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, and another………………..Respondents Judgment November 20, 2008. Result: The Rule ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Wahed Asgar Chowdhury Vs. Judge 2nd Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....t High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Sheikh Hassan Arif J Wahed Asgar Chowdhury……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge 2nd Artha Rin Adalat & others………………………Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010.......igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Sheikh Hassan Arif J Wahed Asgar Chowdhury……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge 2nd Artha Rin Adalat & others………………………Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. Re......Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Sheikh Hassan Arif J Wahed Asgar Chowdhury……………………Petitioner Vs. Judge 2nd Artha Rin Adalat & others………………………Respondents Judgment August 24, 2010. Result......n the order No.69 dated 13-5-1998 passed by the 2nd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No.6 of 1988 making the preliminary decree dated 29-8-1991 final, the said decree signed on 23-6-1998 and also the Execution Case No.215 of 2004 started on the basis of that final decree dated 23-6-1998..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 134
....f 1997.
Judgment
Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the plaintiff-opposite party No.1 to show cause why order dated 17-8-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Suit No.2 of 1995 should not be set aside.
2. The short fact.......
Judgment
Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the plaintiff-opposite party No.1 to show cause why order dated 17-8-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Suit No.2 of 1995 should not be set aside.
2. The short fact leadi......
Judgment
Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the plaintiff-opposite party No.1 to show cause why order dated 17-8-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Suit No.2 of 1995 should not be set aside.
2. The short fact leading t......e Court
High Court Division
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J
Gour Gopal Saha J
Kazi Gowaherul Islam (KJ Islam)……………Petitioner
Vs.
Standard Co-operative Credit Society Ltd and another………………Opposite Party
Judgment
M..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 135
.... Opposite Party No.1.
Civil Revision No.2611 of 1996.
Judgment
Gour Gopal Saba J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 5‑8‑1996 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 2nd Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Commercial Sub-Judge Court, Chittagong in Money Suit No.31 of 1990 (previously ......ite Party No.1.
Civil Revision No.2611 of 1996.
Judgment
Gour Gopal Saba J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 5‑8‑1996 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 2nd Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Commercial Sub-Judge Court, Chittagong in Money Suit No.31 of 1990 (previously Money ......Party No.1.
Civil Revision No.2611 of 1996.
Judgment
Gour Gopal Saba J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 5‑8‑1996 passed by the Subordinate Judge and 2nd Court of Artha Rin Adalat and Commercial Sub-Judge Court, Chittagong in Money Suit No.31 of 1990 (previously Money Suit......s also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 417...
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Salma Begum Vs. Sonali Bank Limited and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....Miscellaneous Appeal No.230 of 2009 should not be set-aside and/or such order or further or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Opposite-party No.1 Sonali Bank Limited filed Artha Rin Suit No.131 of 2003 on 26-4-2003 against the opposite-party No.4 and another impleading th......laneous Appeal No.230 of 2009 should not be set-aside and/or such order or further or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Opposite-party No.1 Sonali Bank Limited filed Artha Rin Suit No.131 of 2003 on 26-4-2003 against the opposite-party No.4 and another impleading them as ......e Dainik Sangbad' on 13-8-2005, but no bidder was participated. Then, the decree-holder bank made a prayer to the executing Court on 8-1-2006 to issue certificate under section 33(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. Accordingly, a certificate under the said section was issued on 9-1-2007. On the b......preme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Abdul Awal J FRM Nazmul Ahasan J Salma Begum……………………Petitioner Vs. Sonali Bank Limited and others………………………Opposite-Parties Judgment August 19, 2010. Result: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 229
Monjurur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Dr. Naimur Rahman, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....Appeal No. 301 of 1993. Judgment Md. Abdul Karim J.- This appeal at the ins of the plaintiff is directed against the Judgment decree dated 21-9-1995 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 4th Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka, in Title Suit No. 32 of 1993 decreeing the suit for partition in preliminar...... No. 301 of 1993. Judgment Md. Abdul Karim J.- This appeal at the ins of the plaintiff is directed against the Judgment decree dated 21-9-1995 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 4th Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka, in Title Suit No. 32 of 1993 decreeing the suit for partition in preliminary form...... 301 of 1993. Judgment Md. Abdul Karim J.- This appeal at the ins of the plaintiff is directed against the Judgment decree dated 21-9-1995 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 4th Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka, in Title Suit No. 32 of 1993 decreeing the suit for partition in preliminary form dec.......)……………………Appellant Vs. Dr. Naimur Rahman………………………Respondent Judgment February 12, 1998. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahabubuddin Ahmed with SR Khorshnabish, M Hasan, Advocates - For the Appellant. Habibul ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Rehana Ahmed and others Vs. Nahar Shipping Lines Limited, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....pplication is dismissed, but without any order as to costs. The restrictive orders and undertaking passed and given are hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 256.......y respectively. However, the bank account of the company was opened and operated by joint signatures of the respondent No.2 and late Md. Ashraf Ahmed. The company obtained loan from Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Respondent No.3 and the Investment Corporation of Bangladesh (ICB) Respondent No......pplication is dismissed, but without any order as to costs. The restrictive orders and undertaking passed and given are hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 256.......ereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 256...Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 233
Humayun Hossain Khan Vs. Bangladesh & others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....failed to pay the regular installments to the Bank and requested the Bank for rescheduling the outstanding debt with simple interest. But the Bank instituted Title Suit No. 15 of 2003 in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka against the appellant on January 27, 2003 for realization of the loan a...... to pay the regular installments to the Bank and requested the Bank for rescheduling the outstanding debt with simple interest. But the Bank instituted Title Suit No. 15 of 2003 in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka against the appellant on January 27, 2003 for realization of the loan along w......pay the regular installments to the Bank and requested the Bank for rescheduling the outstanding debt with simple interest. But the Bank instituted Title Suit No. 15 of 2003 in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka against the appellant on January 27, 2003 for realization of the loan along with ......ain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mamunur Rashid, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. None Represented—For Respondent Nos. 1 and 3-5. Civil Appeal No.176 of 2010. (From the judgment and Order dated the 8th day of April,..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Indu Mod Howlader Vs. Additional Deputy Commissioner and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....sing out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure calls in question the judgment and decree dated 17‑4‑95 passed in Title Appeal No.115 of 1991 by the Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal reversing the judgment and decree dated 24‑11‑1990 passed in Title Sui......ut of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure calls in question the judgment and decree dated 17‑4‑95 passed in Title Appeal No.115 of 1991 by the Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal reversing the judgment and decree dated 24‑11‑1990 passed in Title Suit No.8......f an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure calls in question the judgment and decree dated 17‑4‑95 passed in Title Appeal No.115 of 1991 by the Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal reversing the judgment and decree dated 24‑11‑1990 passed in Title Suit No.87 of......44...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Agrani Bank Vs. Sultana Jute Mills Limited and others, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....ance of the petitioner Agrani Bank, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 19.2.92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No. 21 of 1990 entertaining the counter‑claim of res......f the petitioner Agrani Bank, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 19.2.92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No. 21 of 1990 entertaining the counter‑claim of responden......e petitioner Agrani Bank, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 19.2.92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Mortgage Suit No. 21 of 1990 entertaining the counter‑claim of respondent No......n) Present: Habibur Rahman Khan J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Agrani Bank……………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Sultana Jute Mills Limited and others…………………….Respondents Judgment December 1, 1993. Result: The R..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Belayet Hossain Vs. Bank Indosuez, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....ite Party. Civil Revision No.117 of 1995. Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4-9-94 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and Subordinate Judge, Dhaka in Money Suit No 109 of 1991 should not be set as......rty. Civil Revision No.117 of 1995. Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4-9-94 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and Subordinate Judge, Dhaka in Money Suit No 109 of 1991 should not be set aside or...... Civil Revision No.117 of 1995. Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4-9-94 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and Subordinate Judge, Dhaka in Money Suit No 109 of 1991 should not be set aside or suc......………Petitioner Vs. Bank Indosuez…………………Opposite Party Judgment January 19, 1998. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Sultana Jute Mills Ltd. and ors Vs. Agrani Bank and others, 14 BLD (AD) (1994) 195; 46 DLR (AD) 174. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Nurul Amin Bhuiyan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ing for the respondent-bank opposes the Rule and submits that the law does not require a notice to be served upon the third party mortgagor before publishing an auction notice under section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. In the present case the borrower admittedly failed to repay the loan, th......r the respondent-bank opposes the Rule and submits that the law does not require a notice to be served upon the third party mortgagor before publishing an auction notice under section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. In the present case the borrower admittedly failed to repay the loan, therefor......e respondent-bank opposes the Rule and submits that the law does not require a notice to be served upon the third party mortgagor before publishing an auction notice under section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. In the present case the borrower admittedly failed to repay the loan, therefore th...... Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J Nurul Amin Bhuiyan ... ...................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others ................. Respondents Judgment February 10, 2011. Result: The Rule is..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Overseas Garments Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
...., Advocate—For Respondent No. 4. Writ Petition No. 1709 of 2004. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003) should not be declared ultra vires of the Constitu......cate—For Respondent No. 4. Writ Petition No. 1709 of 2004. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003) should not be declared ultra vires of the Constitution a......—For Respondent No. 4. Writ Petition No. 1709 of 2004. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003) should not be declared ultra vires of the Constitution and w...... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Md. Emdadul Huq J Overseas Garments Industries (Pvt.) Ltd..............Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others.................................Respondents Judgment January 12, 2005. Result: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Chairman, National Board of Revenue, Bangladesh Vs. M/s. GMG Corporation Ltd., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... COURT By the majority opinion the appeal is allowed with costs and judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 262. ......ndent executed a deed of mortgage to meet the requirement of the BCCI offering some immovable properties as the additional security after obtaining no objection clearance from the Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, with which the properties were mortgaged. The mortgage deed was presented for regist...... COURT By the majority opinion the appeal is allowed with costs and judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 262. ......eferred To- 21 Cal 241; Secretary to the Commission of Salt etc. Madras Vs. Mrs. Orr 38 Mad 646; Board of Revenue Vs. Sorrarazu, AIR 1976 Mad 1038 (FB); Mutual Property Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioner, 1926 All England Reports 493; Mad. B. P. 3011 R. Mis.; Inland Revenue Comm..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 269
72897285727872497247724172167213720571947180715071377126709370537049703070287018