Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3041-3060 of 6409 results.
Md. Abdul Based Sheikh and others Vs. Md. Jinder Ali Khan and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J.- The instant leave petition filed under Article 103 of the Constitution is against the judgment and order dated 12.01.09 passed by the High Court Division making the Rule absolute issued in Civil Revision No. 2084 of 2004 and thereby setting aside the judgment and o......Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J.- The instant leave petition filed under Article 103 of the Constitution is against the judgment and order dated 12.01.09 passed by the High Court Division making the Rule absolute issued in Civil Revision No. 2084 of 2004 and thereby setting aside the judgment and order ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Ali Amzad Khan Vs. Md. Titam Khan and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....000/- is to be deposited within 1 (one) month. Petitioner is permitted to prepare the paper book out of Court in accordance with rule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 495. ......defendant thereupon moved the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2078 of 2002. A Single Bench of the High Court Division by impugned judgment and order dated 4th November, 2008 made the rule absolute, reversed the judgment of the Court of appeal below and restored those of the trial Court..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
..... Since review does not mean rehearing of the matter, we find no merit in the review petition.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 477.
......esaid judgment and order, the pre-emptees respondents moved the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1437 of 1973. A Single Bench of the High Court Division upon hearing the parties made the rule absolute by judgment dated 15th June, 2008 and reversed the judgment of the appellate Court below. T..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Rupesh Ranan Dey and another Vs. Md. Abdur Razaque and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....vision in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.911 of 2008 dismissing the same affirming those dated 08.04.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3291 of 2000 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts involved in the case, in short, are that Tara Moni Dey, Upendra Kumar Dey. Moh...... above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 512. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Shahidul Islam and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....rticle 103 of the Constitution are taken up together for disposal. The leave petitions arose out of a common judgment and order dated 28.01.2009 passed by the High Court Division in discharging the Rules issued in Civil Revision Nos. 4280 and 4281 of 1995. The subject matter of the leave petitions......out of Court in accordance with Rules. The order of status quo granted earlier by this Court to continue till disposal of the appeals. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 492. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Anti Corruption Commission Vs. M.A.H. Salim and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....one week of submission of the appellant's of concise statement. The parties are at liberty to mention the matter for expeditious hearing. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 474. ......n Magistrate, Dhaka. The learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate allowed the prayer. The writ petitioner challenged the said order by a writ petition before the High Court Division, which made the rule absolute and quashed the order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. In the meantime, the case recor..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 136
Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation Vs. Depak Kumar Pal and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....for leave is condoned. 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.05.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.605 of 2006 making the Rule absolute. 3. The facts leading to the filing of this petition for leave to appeal, in short,......eave is condoned. 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.05.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.605 of 2006 making the Rule absolute. 3. The facts leading to the filing of this petition for leave to appeal, in short, are:..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Superintendent Musrat Dhulia Dakhil Madrasha Vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
..... This is an application under Article 103 of the Constitution filed challenging the judgment and order dated 23.11.2008 passed in Civil Revision No. 588 of 2002 by the High Court Division making the Rule absolute, thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2001 passed in other Appeal N......s is an application under Article 103 of the Constitution filed challenging the judgment and order dated 23.11.2008 passed in Civil Revision No. 588 of 2002 by the High Court Division making the Rule absolute, thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2001 passed in other Appeal No.25 ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Bikash Ranjan Talukder and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... any legal right to the respondents as the same has no statutory force. II. Whether the writ petitions filed by the respondents are maintainable as there is a provision of appeal as envisages in Rule 16 of the said Nitimala of 1995, which was not exhausted by the respondents as being an alterna......after compliance of formalities and thus the writ petitions are not maintainable. 5. The High Court Division upon hearing the parties by judgment and order dated 11th November, 2009 made the rules absolute and directed the writ respondents to release the salary of all the writ petitioners inclu..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Most. Begum Rofika Vs. Mohammad Ali Sheikh others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... to appeal, at the instance of the pre-emptee petitioner, is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.4.2008 of the High Court Division passed in Civil Revision No. 593 of 2007 discharging the Rule obtained challenging those of dated 5.2.2004 of the learned Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, Ga...... non consideration of evidence or that the judgment of the High Court Division is materially perverse. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 502. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Matiur Rahman and others Vs. Md. Nowab Ali and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....r Rahman J.- The instant leave petition under Article 103 of the Constitution seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 22.01.2009 passed by the High Court Division discharging the Rule issued in Civil Revision No. 3328 of 2009 Which was filed challenging the judgment and decree d...... credibility in any manner whatsoever regarding title and possession. The evidence of the plaintiffs regarding title and possession are consistent, uniform and corroborative with each other. There is absolutely no reason to disbelieve those competent witnesses. So the same are invulnerable to the cr..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Kabir Hossain and others Vs. Abdur Razzak Mallik and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ivision on the point of limitation. In view of the above, we find no merit in this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 486. ......hereupon moved the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos.3631 and 3633 of 1994. A Single Bench of the High Court Division by the impugned judgment made the rule in Civil Revision No. 3631 of 1994 absolute and set aside the judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No.77 of 1987 and discharged the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Tuglak Khan Vs. Md. Sultan Nasiruddin, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....n) Present: Naimuddin Ahmed J Tuglak Khan…………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Nasiruddin……………………Opposite Party Judgment June 13, 1991. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, with Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocates ‑ For .......1.84 the plaintiff again demanded back the deed from the defendant but did not get it. On the other hand, the defendant disclosed that the plaintiff had actually transferred the disputed land to him absolutely by executing a deed of Hiba‑Bil‑Ewaz on 9.11.83. Thereafter, the plaintiff obtained t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Abdur Razzaque Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....r Razzaque……………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others…………………Respondents Judgment December 18, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mosharraf Hossain Chowdhury Vs. General Manager, Tita......…………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others…………………Respondents Judgment December 18, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mosharraf Hossain Chowdhury Vs. General Manager, Titas Gas Transmi..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abu Sufian and Others Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....baidul Hoq and 10 Ors……………………Petitioners Vs. State……………………Opposite Party (Criminal Revision No.1702 of 1991). Judgment February 18, 1993. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Alam and 3 others Vs. State, 19 DLR (SC) ......10 Ors……………………Petitioners Vs. State……………………Opposite Party (Criminal Revision No.1702 of 1991). Judgment February 18, 1993. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Alam and 3 others Vs. State, 19 DLR (SC) 242; State Vs. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Abul Ahsan Joardar Vs. Kazi Misbahul Alam, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Abul Ahsan Joardar……………………Petitioner Vs. Kazi Misbahul Alam……………………Opposite Party Judgment November 30, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Haji Azizur Rahman and others Vs. Syeedul Haque Chow......l Hoque J Abul Ahsan Joardar……………………Petitioner Vs. Kazi Misbahul Alam……………………Opposite Party Judgment November 30, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Haji Azizur Rahman and others Vs. Syeedul Haque Chowdhury, 38 DLR..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 98
....oon and another ……………..Petitioners
Vs.
Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works and others…………….Respondents
Judgment
May 24, 1993.
Result:
The Rule is discharged.
Case Referred to-
Buxly Paints (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 31 DLR (A......spondents to restore possession of the disputed house to them.
The Rule is, accordingly, discharged without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 601.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Mahfuzur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Forest Industries Development Corporation (BFIDC), 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....on (BFIDC) represented by the Chairman having registered office at 73, Motijheel Commercial Area within PS Motijheel Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment April 22, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohanunadulla, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. HK......presented by the Chairman having registered office at 73, Motijheel Commercial Area within PS Motijheel Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment April 22, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohanunadulla, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. HK Abdul Hye, A..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 177
Aftabur Rahman Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....ur Rahman Khan J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Aftabur Rahman……………………Petitioner Vs. State……………………Opposite Party Judgment July 26, 1993. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Khondakar Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 34 DLR (AD......n J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Aftabur Rahman……………………Petitioner Vs. State……………………Opposite Party Judgment July 26, 1993. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Khondakar Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 34 DLR (AD) 222; Mohd. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Eurco Explorer Co. Ltd. Athens Greece and others Vs. Grain Bank Ltd., 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....fizullah, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioners. Mokbul Ahmed, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.457 of 1988. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- The petitioners obtained this Rule against the order of an ad interim attachment before judgment passed on March 7, 1988 by the le...... Eurco Explorer Co. Ltd. Athens Greece and others………………Petitioners Vs. Grain Bank Ltd……………Opposite Party Judgment November 23, 1992. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Messers United Venture Navigation Co. Ltd. Vs. Samudrajatra Shipp..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 75
55455544554355425541554055395538553755355534553355325531553055295528552755265525