Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 3041-3048 of 3048 results.

Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......sion right­ly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  The appeal is dismissed.   Ed. ......prosecution case and refused to consider the grounds urged in appeal and also failed to consider the evi­dence and contradictions in the same and dismissed the appeal without assigning any cogent reason and the further submission that only assault attributed to the appellant being a dealing of b..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95

Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....six) months.  9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground.  10.  The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months.  Ed ......six) months.  9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground.  10.  The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months.  Ed ......;tioners that is respondents in all these civil petitions for leave to appeal were appointed as workers on different dates in the Labour Division of Meghna Textile  Mills Ltd., Tongi Industrial Area, Tongi, Gazipur and were dismissed from service with effect from 09.08.1993 on the ground that t..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120

Sujit Chandra Roy and others Vs. Abdur Rouf and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....Section 379 of the Penal Code. It is further, contended that the High Court Division did not consider that there was enmity between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of previous civil and criminal cases. If was also argued that the respondent complainant is not the owner of the pond.&nbs......udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our inter­ference.   Accordingly, this petition is dis­missed.  Ed. ......leading to this peti­tion are that the complainant-respondent, Abdur Rouf lodged a complaint on 20-6-2000 against the accused petitioner alleg­ing, inter alia, that the respondent No. 1  reared fish in a pond on his land and because of the risk of level of water rising above the banks o..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104

Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ind merit in the appeal.  Accordingly the appeal is allowed.  There is no order as to costs.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ssion of the learned Counsel of the  appellant the learned Counsel of the Respondent No. 1 has submitted that writ-Respondents by canceling the said Respondent No. 1's LPR benefits caused immense financial difficul­ties and unjustly deprived the writ-peti­tioner from the legally en......tion was filed and rejected and thereupon the present appeal, awaits disposal and as the grounds upon which leave obtained relate to merit of the writ petition he intends to confine himself as to the rea­sonableness and rationality of the ad-interim order passed granting the entire relief sought..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order.  15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition.  The petition is dismissed.  Ed. ......commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order.  15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition.  The petition is dismissed.  Ed. ...... fur­ther investigation of the case and the learned Magistrate directed- for further investigation and Mr. Nurul Amin, Assistant Superintendent of Police, C.I.D. held further investigation and thereafter submitted sup­plementary charge sheet No. 19 dated 03.12.2001 under sections 302/114/34 ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103

State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ch of them to death. The trial court also made reference under section 374 of  the Code of Criminal Procedure for confirmation of the sentence of death and the condemned prisoners also preferred criminal appeal as aforesaid.  5.  The High Court Division on consider­ation of the m......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same.  Accordingly, the petition is dis­missed.  Ed. ......s that on the night following 29.03.1997 after 11.00 P.M. the accused persons being armed with deadly weapons such as pipegun, kiris, dagger, iron rod etc. entered into Brahmanbaria Head Post Office breaking grill of a window and killing night guard Abdul Mannan and treasurer Abul Kalam Azad and loo..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......ered by the Court.  15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division.  In the result, the appeal is dismissed.  Ed. ......id judgment the Bank preferred Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1 049 of 2002 before this Division and by judgment and order dated 22.4.2003 this Court dis­missed the aforesaid petition. Thereafter the respondent filed an application before this Court for further extension of time for hold..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118

Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

.... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......e appellants Shafiuddin Sheikh and Jaber Sheikh caught hold of the hands of Abdul Gafur and then convict Aynul Sheikh dealt a spade blow on the head of Abdul Gafur who fell down on the ground and thereafter other accused persons (since acquitted) dealt lathi and mugur blows indiscriminately on the ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97