Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ali Akbar (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....dingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 201.......dingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 201.......dingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 201.......ial Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mahmud Hossain J Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J Ali Akbar (Md.) ………………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……………………………Respondents. Judgment ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Ziaul Hoque Chowdhury (Md.) Vs. State and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....order is set aside. The learned Additional Sessions Judge is directed to proceed with the case in the light of the observations made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 193. ......89 (SC) 1137; Rambilas Singh and others Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1989 (SC) 1593; Salam Master alias Salam and another Vs. State, 36 DLR (AD) 58; Shamsun Nahar alias Maina Vs. State, 1984 BLD (AD) 206; Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 29 DLR (SC) 256; Bangladesh Vs. Yakub Sardar and others, 40 DLR (AD) 246. ......order is set aside. The learned Additional Sessions Judge is directed to proceed with the case in the light of the observations made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 193. ......eme Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: SK Sinha J Shamim Hasnain J Ziaul Hoque Chowdhury (Md.)…………………………………Petitioner Vs. State and another……………………………………………….Opposite Parties. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Government of Bangladesh represented by the DC, Comilla Vs. Md. Eakub and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....Industries is now obliged to return the money received in respect of schedule-1 (kha) property to the plaintiff. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 176. ......rty to the plaintiff. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 176. ...... the plaintiff. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 176. ......h Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Government of Bangladesh represented by the DC, Comilla………………Appellant Vs. Md. Eakub and others.................................................................Responde..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Mainul Hosein and others Vs. Anwar Hossain and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....e offices specified in clause (4) of Article 147. 181. Mr. Akhtar Imam has relied upon the case of Akbar Hassan Vs. Government of Pakistan reported in PLD 1976 (SC) 315. Mr. Justice Abdul Kadir Sheikh had been a Judge of the Pakistan Supreme Court. By Gazette Notification dated 22-1-1995 he wa......LR (AD) 8; 45 DLR 260; AIR 1973 (SC) 87; 1 BLC 229; 43 DLR 179; AIR 1960 (SC) 378; Khurshed Alam Vs. Bangladesh; 47 DLR 209; Aw Dhaka Industries Ltd Vs. Quamrul Huda and others, 57 DLR (AD) 234; Md. Abdur Rahman Vs. National Tea Company Ltd and others, 4 MLR (AD) 347; Jibon Kumar Barman Vs. M Abdul...... and others, 4 MLR (AD) 347; Jibon Kumar Barman Vs. M Abdul Hye Chairman of the Election Committee and others, 48 DLR 569; Sultana Nahar Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1998 BLD 363 = 2 BLC 430; Md. Abdur Rashid Khan Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 6 MLR (AD) 8; Shahabuddin (Md.) V......ivision (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Joynul Abedin J Abdus J Salam Mamun J Mainul Hosein and others……………………………….Petitioners Vs. Anwar Hossain and others……………………………….Respondents. Judgment ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 324
Moulana Md. Abdul Kader Azadi Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ce with law. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 114. ......ce with law. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 114. ......ce with law. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 114. ......igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mahmud Hossain J Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J Moulana Md. Abdul Kader Azadi……………………………..Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………..Respondents. Judgment A..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Jahangir Hossain Howlader (Md.) Vs. CMM, Dhaka and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....no order as to costs. The order of stay granted at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 106, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 83. ......AIR 1992 (SC) 604; Messrs Pepsi Foods Ltd and another Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and others, AIR 1998 (SC) 128. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with Probir Neogi—For the Petitioner. Abdur Rezaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 1034 of ......wner i.e., the first owner, Cargo Movers, as mentioned by respondent No. 5 in the letter dated 24-6-2001, did not deny the ownership. On 24-7-2001, the petitioner came to learn from Mr. Kazi Harunoor Rashid, Customs Inspector, who was on duty at the delivery gate on the night of 23-7-2001, that some......Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mahmud Hossain J Syed Refaat Ahmed J Jahangir Hossain Howlader (Md.) …………………………………..Petitioner Vs. CMM, Dhaka and others...........................................Respondents. Judgment O..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 158
Dr. Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Chairman, RAJUK & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ceived and there is no scope to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 103. ......t. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 103. ......ceived and there is no scope to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 103. ......me Court High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Sheik Abdul Awal J Dr. Abdur Rahman and others…………………………..Petitioners Vs. Chairman, RAJUK & others.................................Opposite-Parties. Judgment ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Sushovan Guha and others Vs. Mahbubul Mannan Chowdhury and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....s directed to dispose of the revisional application within 2(two) months from the date of the receipt of this order. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 100.......s directed to dispose of the revisional application within 2(two) months from the date of the receipt of this order. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 100.......s directed to dispose of the revisional application within 2(two) months from the date of the receipt of this order. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 100....... Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Syed AB Mahinudul Huq J Sushovan Guha and others……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Mahbubul Mannan Chowdhury and others................Opposite Parties. Judgment December..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Abdul Mannan alias Mona Miah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... of Additional Sessions Judge, and Nari-o Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat No. 2, Noakhali for necessary action in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 91. ...... of Additional Sessions Judge, and Nari-o Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat No. 2, Noakhali for necessary action in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 91. ...... of Additional Sessions Judge, and Nari-o Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat No. 2, Noakhali for necessary action in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 91. ...... High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Syed AB Mahmudul Huq J Abdul Mannan alias Mona Miah…………………………Accused-Appellant Vs. State …………………………………………………………………Respondent. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Helal Jute Press Ltd. and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ntenance of the godowns within 10 months be set aside. There shall be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 70, VIII ADC (2011) 376, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 86. ...... Ali, 42 DLR (AD) 13; Shamsum Nahar Salam and others Vs. Wahidur Rahman and others, 51 DLR (AD) 232, Naico (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and others, 2 MLR (AD) 402; Abdur Rahim and others Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others (CPLA No-369 of 2007); The Bangla......ntenance of the godowns within 10 months be set aside. There shall be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 70, VIII ADC (2011) 376, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 86. ......J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Government of Bangladesh repreÂsented by Secretary, Ministry of Jute, Secretariat Building, Dhaka..........................................................Appellant Vs. Helal Jute Press Ltd. and others……………..........Respondents Judgment July 21, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Md. Bazlur Rashid Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ecision and there is no illegality or infirÂmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 53. ......ting the vested right of the petitioner does not arise. Simply a right given under the Rule was taken away by a subsequent amendment of the Rule, in that view of the matter the main contention of Mr. Abdur Razzak that the vested right of the petitioner has been affectÂed has no leg to stand. 14.......11) 53. ......resent: M.M. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Bazlur Rashid ………………………............Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, repreÂsented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affair..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Jahangir Alam (Md.) and another Vs. Md. Shamsur Rahman Sarder & others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... Appeal No. 271 of 2003 is disposed of in the terms of the judgment in C.A. No. 270 of 2003. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 22, 8LG (AD) (2011) 65, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 52. ...... Appeal No. 271 of 2003 is disposed of in the terms of the judgment in C.A. No. 270 of 2003. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 22, 8LG (AD) (2011) 65, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 52. ...... Appeal No. 271 of 2003 is disposed of in the terms of the judgment in C.A. No. 270 of 2003. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 22, 8LG (AD) (2011) 65, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 52. ......2011) 52. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Kamrun Nahar and 5 anothers, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....on Rules, 1981. These petitions are disposed of with the above modification and observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 18, VIII ADC (2011) 95, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 21.......on Rules, 1981. These petitions are disposed of with the above modification and observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 18, VIII ADC (2011) 95, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 21.......on Rules, 1981. These petitions are disposed of with the above modification and observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 18, VIII ADC (2011) 95, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 21.......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J SK Sinha J Government of Bangladesh and others.............Petitioners (In all the cases) Vs. Kamrun Nahar and 5 anothers........................Respondents Judgment December 5, 20..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 164
Yusuf Mia Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ncel the bail, if the accused petitioner misuses in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:  ...... Mia………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………Opposite party Judgment March 28, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rashid, Advocate - For the petitioner. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant Attorney General - For the O......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………Opposite party Judgment March 28, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rashid, Advocate - For the petitioner. Bashir Ahmed, Assistant Attorney General - For the Opposit......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Yusuf Mia………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. The State………………………………………Opposite party Judgment March 28,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Md. Abdul Gafur and others Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioners misuse in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......part. The petitioner Nos. 2. Md. Foyez, son of late Khulla Mia, 3. Md. Kader @ Kader Hossain@ Barmaiya Kader, son of late Nasir Ahmed, 4. Md. Nurul Haque, son of Abdul Kader, 5. Md. Nasir, son of Md. Abdur Rahman @ Badsha@ Bailla, 6. Md. Ishaque, son of late Kala Mia and 7. Md. Mostafa, son of late ...... to cancel the bail, if the accused petitioners misuse in any way the privilege of bail. Communicate the order at once. Md. Ashraful Kamal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Asaduzzaman J Md. Ashraful Kamal J Md. Abdul Gafur and others………………………………Petitioners Vs. The State………………………………..………………………….Opposite party ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
State Vs. Syduzzaman Faruq, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....he respondent on bail. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. '' Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 115. ......he respondent on bail. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. '' Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 115. ......he respondent on bail. There is, therefore, no cogent reason to interfere with the same. '' Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 115. ......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka........Petitioner Vs. Syduzzaman Faruq....................................................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
State Vs. Mirza Abbas, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... the case at this stage. We find no merit in the contention of the learned Attorney General. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 114....... the case at this stage. We find no merit in the contention of the learned Attorney General. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 114....... the case at this stage. We find no merit in the contention of the learned Attorney General. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 114.......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J The State........................................Petitioner Vs. Mirza Abbas....................................Respondent Judgment October 4, 2010. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Ziaul Karim Farazi and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....smissed the A.T. Case No. 89 of 2000. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 111, 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 119. ......smissed the A.T. Case No. 89 of 2000. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 111, 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 119. ......smissed the A.T. Case No. 89 of 2000. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 111, 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 119. ......sion (Civil) Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Ziaul Karim Farazi and others .....................................Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, (Finance Division..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 215
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81