Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 301-320 of 614 results.
Naogaon Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. Pubali Batik Ltd., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....nts already transferred the building may be Court concerned with the land at about Taka 21,00,000. 2. Short facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that, Pubali Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 132 of 1994 before the Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon for realisation of its ou......ready transferred the building may be Court concerned with the land at about Taka 21,00,000. 2. Short facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that, Pubali Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 132 of 1994 before the Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon for realisation of its outstand......y transferred the building may be Court concerned with the land at about Taka 21,00,000. 2. Short facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that, Pubali Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 132 of 1994 before the Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon for realisation of its outstanding ......inate Judge rightly found that the plaintiff against the order dated 10‑1‑2001 passed in had done works beyond the tender, which the Miscellaneous Case No. 1 of 1999 sending a defendants received and enjoyed. Not only that the complaint against the petitioner to the Criminal defendants already t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Mollah Shabidul Islam Vs. Md. Monsur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....2. MB Taj Mohammad, Advocate—For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 5439 of 2003. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 5‑8‑03 passed by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No.47 of 2003. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are th......MB Taj Mohammad, Advocate—For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 5439 of 2003. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 5‑8‑03 passed by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No.47 of 2003. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the......aj Mohammad, Advocate—For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 5439 of 2003. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 5‑8‑03 passed by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No.47 of 2003. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the res......on (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Md. Emdadul Huq J Mollah Shabidul Islam…………………………………….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Monsur Rahman and others.......................Respondents Judgment January 3, 2005. Result: The Rule ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 61
IFIC Bank Ltd. and others Vs. Beximco Holdings Ltd. and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....decree of several declarations including the ones that no amount was due from the plaintiffs to the defendants under the schedule 112 accounts and the Baghkhali Fisheries Ltd. under section 47 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, briefly, the Ain, and that no suit could be filed by the defendants agai...... of several declarations including the ones that no amount was due from the plaintiffs to the defendants under the schedule 112 accounts and the Baghkhali Fisheries Ltd. under section 47 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, briefly, the Ain, and that no suit could be filed by the defendants against th......several declarations including the ones that no amount was due from the plaintiffs to the defendants under the schedule 112 accounts and the Baghkhali Fisheries Ltd. under section 47 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, briefly, the Ain, and that no suit could be filed by the defendants against the pl......This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 154...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Noor Alam Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... contesting defendant No. 3 examined in all 3(three) witnesses and both the parties exhibited a series of documents to prove their respective cases. 5. The learned Subordinate Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.1 heard the learned Advocates of both the sides and ultimately, on consideration......sting defendant No. 3 examined in all 3(three) witnesses and both the parties exhibited a series of documents to prove their respective cases. 5. The learned Subordinate Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.1 heard the learned Advocates of both the sides and ultimately, on consideration of th......g defendant No. 3 examined in all 3(three) witnesses and both the parties exhibited a series of documents to prove their respective cases. 5. The learned Subordinate Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.1 heard the learned Advocates of both the sides and ultimately, on consideration of the ev......332...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Fatema Khatoon Vs. City Bank Ltd. and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
.... Golam Rabbani J.- Petitioner Fatema Khatun filed an application under Order 1 rule 10 CPC for adding her as a defendant in Title Suit No.225 of 1991 pending in the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat. Her application was rejected by the order dated 23-7-95 and so she has obtained th...... Rabbani J.- Petitioner Fatema Khatun filed an application under Order 1 rule 10 CPC for adding her as a defendant in Title Suit No.225 of 1991 pending in the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat. Her application was rejected by the order dated 23-7-95 and so she has obtained this Rul......bani J.- Petitioner Fatema Khatun filed an application under Order 1 rule 10 CPC for adding her as a defendant in Title Suit No.225 of 1991 pending in the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat. Her application was rejected by the order dated 23-7-95 and so she has obtained this Rule ag......al Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Gholam Rabbani J M Bazlur Rahman Talukder J Fatema Khatoon……………………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. City Bank Ltd. and others………………………………………..Opposite parties Judgment August 25, ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Ayar @ Ayaruddin and others Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....for taking necessary actions in this regard in the light of the observations made above within 7(seven) days from the date of receipt hereof. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 495.......for taking necessary actions in this regard in the light of the observations made above within 7(seven) days from the date of receipt hereof. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 495.......der special laws. When a convict is tried under the Special law, which prescribes a special period of limitation for appeal against an order or judgment by a Special Tribunal or Tribunal or a Bishesh Adalat, as the case may be, in view of section 29 of the Limitation Act, section 5 thereof cannot be......his Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 495...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Abdul Halim Ukil Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....e and Deputy Commissioner Sherpur, Jamalpur, and Druta Bichar Ain Adalat Sherpur and Jamalpur for information, guidance and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 281.......e and Deputy Commissioner Sherpur, Jamalpur, and Druta Bichar Ain Adalat Sherpur and Jamalpur for information, guidance and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 281.......f Nalitabari PS case dated 10‑11‑2003 under section 4(1) Ain Sringkhala Bignakari Aparad Druta Bichar Ain, 2002, now pending in the Court of Mr. Golam Kabir, Magistrate 1st Class Druta Bichar Ain Adalat Sherpur should not be transferred from that Court to any other appropriate Court for fair and......a Bichar Ain, 2002, now pending in the Court of Mr. Golam Kabir, Magistrate 1st Class Druta Bichar Ain Adalat Sherpur should not be transferred from that Court to any other appropriate Court for fair and impartial trial and disposal. 2. The matter being urgent service of notice upon State-opposit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
MR Trading Co. Vs. Superintendent Engineer and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....t, submitted that being hard pressed for capital to continue the works, the plaintiff had to borrow money from the Uttara Bank. Uttara Bank instituted Money Suit No. 496 of 2002 in the Third Court of Artha Rin Adalat at Dhaka for recovery of Taka 3,89,00,000. The plaintiff has to pay huge amount of ......mitted that being hard pressed for capital to continue the works, the plaintiff had to borrow money from the Uttara Bank. Uttara Bank instituted Money Suit No. 496 of 2002 in the Third Court of Artha Rin Adalat at Dhaka for recovery of Taka 3,89,00,000. The plaintiff has to pay huge amount of intere......ed that being hard pressed for capital to continue the works, the plaintiff had to borrow money from the Uttara Bank. Uttara Bank instituted Money Suit No. 496 of 2002 in the Third Court of Artha Rin Adalat at Dhaka for recovery of Taka 3,89,00,000. The plaintiff has to pay huge amount of interest o...... ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
One Bank Limited and others Vs. Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Limited and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... 4. The writ petitioner, namely Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Limited filed the writ petition challenging order No.1 dated 23.01.2008, order No.13 dated 6.4.2008 and order No.49 dated 19.01.2009 passed in Artha Rin Suit No.7 of 2008, now pending before the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong. It wa......The writ petitioner, namely Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Limited filed the writ petition challenging order No.1 dated 23.01.2008, order No.13 dated 6.4.2008 and order No.49 dated 19.01.2009 passed in Artha Rin Suit No.7 of 2008, now pending before the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong. It was cont...... filed the writ petition challenging order No.1 dated 23.01.2008, order No.13 dated 6.4.2008 and order No.49 dated 19.01.2009 passed in Artha Rin Suit No.7 of 2008, now pending before the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong. It was contended that the presiding Judge was not authorised to pas......Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Md. Shamsul Huda J One Bank Limited…………................Petitioner (In Civil Petition No.620 of 2011) Vs. Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Limited and others................Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 620 of 2011) Chaya Developer (Pvt.)..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 59
....ndant No.1 preferred Other Appeal No.35 of 1990 in the Court of the learned District Judge, Chittagong which was ultimately heard and disposed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court and Artharin Adalat, Chittagong.
8. The appellate court though upheld the finding and decision of the...... and decisions of the High Court Division and in the circumstances this appeal be dismissed on contest without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 921.
......1 preferred Other Appeal No.35 of 1990 in the Court of the learned District Judge, Chittagong which was ultimately heard and disposed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court and Artharin Adalat, Chittagong.
8. The appellate court though upheld the finding and decision of the trial co......ana J
Syed Mahmud Hossain J
Muhammad Imman Ali J
Muhammad Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J
Md. Shamsul Huda J
Roy Mohan Dey ........................................Appellant
Vs.
Jogesh Chandra Dey being died his legal heirs: Snehabala Dey and others........................................
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Md. Hossain Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....07. 2. Facts necessary for disposal of this leave petition, in short, are that respondent No.1, Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation instituted Miscellaneous Case No.16 of 1991 before the Artha Rin Adalat at Jessore under the provision of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Ord...... 2. Facts necessary for disposal of this leave petition, in short, are that respondent No.1, Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation instituted Miscellaneous Case No.16 of 1991 before the Artha Rin Adalat at Jessore under the provision of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Order, 19......Facts necessary for disposal of this leave petition, in short, are that respondent No.1, Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation instituted Miscellaneous Case No.16 of 1991 before the Artha Rin Adalat at Jessore under the provision of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Order, 1973 (......hhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Md. Hossain Ahmed.........................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation and another……….........Respondents Judgment February 27, 2011. Result: The ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Afzal Hossain Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... act for the same avowed purpose of free and fair election. We find no illegality in the order and hence the petition is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 701. ......didate as in section 7(2)(g) when he or she had defaulted in paying any loan taken by him or her from any specified bank which has been explained to mean Sonali Bank, Agrani Bank, Janata Bank, Shilpa Rin Sangstha, Shilpa Bank, House Building Finance Corporation, Bangladesh Krishi Bank, Rajshahi Kris...... act for the same avowed purpose of free and fair election. We find no illegality in the order and hence the petition is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 701. ......rt Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Anwarul Hoque Choudhury J KM Hasan J Afzal Hossain…………………………Petitioner Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and others…………………………Respondents Judgment December 1, 1992. Result: T..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 153
Md. Saidur Rahman Vs. Farid Uddin Mahmud and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....t debtors who seeks leave to appeal from the judgment of this Division in Civil Appeal No.177 of 2009 mainly on the ground that Mr. Moshiur Rahman Chowdhury, having not been appointed as Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chiltagong in accordance with section 4(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, the o......ors who seeks leave to appeal from the judgment of this Division in Civil Appeal No.177 of 2009 mainly on the ground that Mr. Moshiur Rahman Chowdhury, having not been appointed as Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chiltagong in accordance with section 4(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, the order o......who seeks leave to appeal from the judgment of this Division in Civil Appeal No.177 of 2009 mainly on the ground that Mr. Moshiur Rahman Chowdhury, having not been appointed as Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Chiltagong in accordance with section 4(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, the order of th...... Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Md. Saidur Rahman………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Farid Uddin Mahmud and others………………………Respondents Judgment March 9, 2011. Result: The pe..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
.... No.2750 of 2009 discharging the Rule.
2. The present petitioners filed the writ petition before the High Court Division impugning the order dated 05.02.2009 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Artha Rin Decree Execution Case No.149 of 2005 rejecting their appl......50 of 2009 discharging the Rule.
2. The present petitioners filed the writ petition before the High Court Division impugning the order dated 05.02.2009 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Artha Rin Decree Execution Case No.149 of 2005 rejecting their applicatio......f 2009 discharging the Rule.
2. The present petitioners filed the writ petition before the High Court Division impugning the order dated 05.02.2009 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Artha Rin Decree Execution Case No.149 of 2005 rejecting their application un...... (2011) 685.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Agrani Bank Limited Vs. M/S. Kalipada Saha & Brothers and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....he High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5201 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts necessary for disposal of this petition for leave to appeal are that the petitioner as plaintiff filed Artha Rin Case No.1 8 of 2004 in the Court of Joint District Judge, Second Court, Rajbari against th......h Court Division in Civil Revision No.5201 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts necessary for disposal of this petition for leave to appeal are that the petitioner as plaintiff filed Artha Rin Case No.1 8 of 2004 in the Court of Joint District Judge, Second Court, Rajbari against the pred......of fact arrived at by the appellate Court, consequently, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 637.......n Ali J Muhammad Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Md. Shamsul Huda J Agrani Bank Limited………………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. M/S. Kalipada Saha & Brothers and others………………..Respondents Judgment June 22, 2011. Result: The petition i..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Md. Bande Ali Miah Vs. Chief Engineer, Housing and Settlement, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....d Settlement, Directorate of Housing and Settlement filed Title Appeal No.99 of 2000 in the Court of the District Judge, Dhaka, which was ultimately heard and disposed of by the Subordinate Judge and Artharin Adalat No.4, Dhaka. 7. The appellate court affirmed the judgment and decree of the tri......leave to appeal, therefore, does not merit any consideration. In the circumstances this civil petition for leave to appeal be dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 604.......ent, Directorate of Housing and Settlement filed Title Appeal No.99 of 2000 in the Court of the District Judge, Dhaka, which was ultimately heard and disposed of by the Subordinate Judge and Artharin Adalat No.4, Dhaka. 7. The appellate court affirmed the judgment and decree of the trial court ...... Present: Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Muhammad Mamtaj Uddin Ahmed J Md. Shamsul Huda J Md. Bande Ali Miah being dead his heirs: 1(a) Payesy Begum and others .........Petitioners Vs. The ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Mizanur Rahman Khan (Md.) and another Vs. Jinnatul Ferdous and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.797 of 1998. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 19-10-97 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.20 of 1997 rejecting the application o......tes — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.797 of 1998. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 19-10-97 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.20 of 1997 rejecting the application of the ......— For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.797 of 1998. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against the order dated 19-10-97 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.20 of 1997 rejecting the application of the peti......Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 493. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Falu Mia Vs. Md. Nazrul Islam and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....er. Not Represented - the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.2670 of 1992. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 14-9-92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Suit No.393 of 1987 exempting the plaintiff from the necessity...... Not Represented - the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.2670 of 1992. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 14-9-92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Suit No.393 of 1987 exempting the plaintiff from the necessity of im...... Represented - the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.2670 of 1992. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 14-9-92 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Suit No.393 of 1987 exempting the plaintiff from the necessity of implea......in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 486. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Shahidul Islam Vs. Mahbubul Alam and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ified apology with the above direction to publish this judgment on the front page of the respective newspaper within 15 days from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 485.......ould not be punished for committing contempt of this Court for publishing news item under the heading ‘Mystery of secret bank papers in the hands of unauthorised people’ in the Independent and ‘Rin Parishode Prati bandhakata’ in the Muktakantha on 2-3-99. All the three entered appearance and......ified apology with the above direction to publish this judgment on the front page of the respective newspaper within 15 days from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 485.......High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Kazi Ebadul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Shahidul Islam………………………….Petitioner Vs. Mahbubul Alam and others…………………………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 10, 1999. Resu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Agrani Bank Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....2003) 389. ......389. ...... ......me Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Agrani Bank………………………Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others…………..Respondents Judgment March 19, 2003. Result: The writ petition ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 200
62926286595458415813576757645761574557435691567356575655563656235597559555945563