Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Bibi Marium and other, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Government of Bangladesh and others ............................Petitioners ......ause delay to the prejudice to the parties. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 100. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Mahbubur Rahman and others Vs. Taslimuddin Ahmad and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....996 has been filed by Bangladesh. Both the appeals are disposed of by a common judgment. 3. Respondent No. 1 filed the aforesaid Administrative Tribunal case impleading the Government of Bangladesh and one Babul Rabbani as respondent No. 2 describing him as. &...... For the reasons stated above, both the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 97. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. SM Fariduddin, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....; Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh........................Petitioner &nb......Nos. 4165 and 4380 of 2000 respectively are hereby set aside and the writ petitions are found to be not maintainable. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 95. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Hyundai Corporation Vs. Sumikin Bussan Corporation & others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....aking authority is a recognised matter. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, in support of his submission that the Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction of judicial review of the action of the Government in the discharge of executive functions as well as activities of State functionary in res......he High Court Division. In aforestated view of the matter this petition is dismissed with the observations made hereinbefore. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 88. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 130
Bangabir Kader Siddiqui, Bir Uttam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Bangabir Kader Siddiqui, Bir Uttam ………….……………. Petitioner Vs. Government Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Law & others… ...…....... There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 64. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 158
BRAC and others Vs. Professor Mozaffar Ahmed and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....A 1860. The Memorandum of the Society of BRAC clearly permits the BRAC to invest money in purchasing shares of a corporate entity be it a banking company or otherwise to obtain permission from the Government or any public body for exercise of its right to sponsor a banking company which in its j......se appeals. Accordingly, the same are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 36. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 199
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ramananda Sarker, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....Roy Choudhury J AMM Rahman J Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Government of Bangladesh………..Petitioner Vs. ...... wronged. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 35. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka Vs. Ujala Match Factory, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... The Income Tax Act, 1922 (XII of 1922), Sections 10(2)(X) & 16(2)(XVI) Since the respondent assessee paid the bonus to the employees as per direction of the Government under the provisions of the above Ordinance and Notification, the question of earning p...... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of Bangladesh and other Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....sp; Government of Bangladesh and other…… Petitioners Vs. ......e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... Act, 1908 (IX of 1908) Section 5 Condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act is a highly discretionary matter and the High Court Division exercised the discretion in favour of the Government respondent so the Appellate Division has nothing to interfere. Lawyers Involved: ...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he door of the Plaintiff in the present case to file and maintain the suit……………….(33 & 34) If an immovable property is acquired validly by the Government the plea of non using it by the requiring body for the purpose for which it was acquired....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n question the judgment and order dated 15.04.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2918 of 1998 thereby declaring the order passed by the respondent No. 1 Government of Bangladesh on 07.09.1998 to be without lawful authority. 2. The case of the w......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....returned to this country and she died in India as Indian National. The suit land was enlisted as enemy property and Abdul Latif Molla who was borgader applied for lease and was granted lease by the Government on 09.07.1970. After the liberation of the country Biraj came back to Bangladesh and fi......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ality of section 4(2) and (3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 1990 (Act IV of 1990) and appointment of Mr.Md Amirul Islam, Subordinate Judge as a Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka by the Government and also challenging the continuation of Title Suit No. 258 of 2000 filed by the respond......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others&hell......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120