Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3241-3260 of 3261 results.
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; M.M. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave directed against the judgment and order dated 06.11.2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2999 of 1999 discharging the Rule. &......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....se No. 2179 of 1994.) Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J:- Accused Abdul Jalil Khan, the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 11.04.2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2179 of 1994 discharging the Rul......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J.- The accused petitioner seeks for leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 06-04-2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 879 of 1998 under 561A of the Co......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Syed J R Mudassir Husain J.- This Criminal Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19-04-2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 2527 of 1997 upholding the order convic......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Md. Ruhul Amin J:- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed by the accused-petitioner against the judgment and order dated 10th June, 1999 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule obtained in Criminal Revision No. 529 of ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Syed J. R. Mudassir Hussain J:- The accused leave petitioners in custody have sought for a leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 5-2-2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1819 of 1994 dismissing the same by upholdin......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 02.06.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 2777 of 1998 dismissing the appeal of t......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 31.07.1997 in Civil Revision No. 1730 of 1992 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division the defendant appellants preferred this appeal. 2. The facts......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- All these petitions for leave to appeal arise out of the judgments and orders dated 03.03.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 3142 of 1999, 4469 of 1999, 4470 of 1999, 447......six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....tion in issuing the Rule in the writ petition only to grant interim order of injunction to the writ petitioners. It was also the contention that in the background of the facts that another Division Bench of the High Court Division by the Judgment on November 24, 1998 discharged the Rule in writ pe......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Latifur Rahman J. - This appeal by leave by the plaintiff-appellant is against the judgment and decree dated 5.3.89 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 40 of 1985 reversing the judgment and decree da......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Sujit Chandra Roy and others Vs. Abdur Rouf and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, J:- This Criminal Petition for leave to Appeal No.81 of 2001 has arisen out of a judgment and order dated 28-4-2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division summarily rejecting the application filed under Section 561A o......udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; M. M. Ruhul Amin, J:- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment and order dated 02.11.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 377 of 1996 allowing the appeal. 2. The ......sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal is against the order dated December 6, 2000 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4666 of 1999 rejecting the application filed b......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J.: Accused petitioner Kamal Uddin seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 08.08.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3446 of 2003 discharging the rul......commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....; M. M. Ruhul Amin, J.:- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.02.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 40 of 2001 and Criminal Appeal No. 3428 of 2......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Syed J R Modassir Hossain, J: Anil Ranjan Deb defendant-petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 17 April, 2001 passed in Civil Revision No. 576 of 1991 by a Single Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31-1-1......agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s Civil Petition for leave to Appeal is hereby condoned. 2. This Civil Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 1998 with Civil Rule No. 41......ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin, J.- This appeal, by leave, is against the judgment and order dated June 8, 2000 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 of 1998 discharging the Rule obtained a......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ted- Respondent Nos. 9-10 & 14-23. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 2003 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin, J. - This appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated August 7, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 800 (condonation) of 2000 discharging the Rule wh......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
364363361357356355354350348346345341337334332331325323306303