Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3241-3260 of 6261 results.
Munshi Mozammel Hossain Vs. Post Master, Faridpur Head Post Office, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....haklader, Advocate ‑For the Petitioner. Md. Delwar Hossain, Assistant Attorney‑General- For the Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 647 of 1987. Judgment Nurul Huque Bhuiyan J. - This Rule Nisi by the petitioner under Article 102 of the Constitution calls upon the respondents to show...... Class), Faridpur Head Post Office, District‑Faridpur and 4 others........Respondents. Judgment July 11, 1990. Case Referred to- Saifur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others, 41 DLR 538. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali for Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate ‑For the Petitioner. M..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Alamgir and others Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....espect of the convict petitioner Alamgir was allowed in part with modification of sentence from sentence of death to imprisonment for life and appeal in respect of petitioner Faruque was dismissed. Rule issued in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.3347 of 2006 having been preferred by petitioner Mamun......nha J Alamgir and others………………………….........Petitioners Vs. The State…………………………………………........Respondent Judgment January 31, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Nikhil Kumar Saint, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Mohammad Abdul Alim Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....). Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.04.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.16 of 2000 discharging the Rule relating to the Building and Premises situated within 922 Ajutangsha of land of Dhaka City Co...... Mohammad Abdul Alim………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……………………Respondents Judgment June 4, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Khondakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Government of Bangladesh and others. Vs. Md. Tarikh-ul-Islam and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ally stopped the MPO of the writ petitioners. III. Because the High Court Division failed to consider that the respondents filed the writ petition without filing departmental appeal provided under Rule 16 of the Non-Government Educational Institutions (College) Rules 1995 and thus the writ petiti......na, Dhaka and others ................Petitioners Vs. Md. Tarikh-ul-Islam and others ...............................................................Respondents Order November 11, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Chowdhury Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Md. Shamsul Alam..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Md. Mahfuzul Haque Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Amin CJ. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25th September, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2790 of 1999 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 344 of 1994 in the Court of......The People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Satkhira and others.............................................................Respondents Judgment June 3, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nondy, Advocate, instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-re..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 147
Jamshed Ali and others. Vs. Azman Ali, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....Ruhul Amin CJ. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20th May, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2407 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the opposite party as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 284 of 1......n J Jamshed Ali and others.............................................Petitioners Vs. Azman Ali being dead his heirs Putul Bibi and others........Respondents Judgment June 9, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record - For the Petitioners. Not represente..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Abdul Malek and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....delay and thereby dismissed the appeal which requires to interference by this Court. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk. 200/-. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: .......Appellants Vs. Md. Abdul Malek and others.............................Respondents Judgment January 14, 2009. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Vs. Jaheruddin, 6 BLD (1986) (AD) 180. Lawyers Involved: JBM Hasan, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-recor..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Government of Bangladesh and others. Vs. Bokul Mia and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....dgment MM Ruhul Amin CJ. - This appeal, by leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 16th January, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in writ Petition No. 6024 of 2004 making the Rule absolute. 2. The writ petition was filed seeking direction on the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka......Muzammel Hossain J Government of Bangladesh and others................Appellants Vs. Bokul Mia and others.......................................Respondents Judgment August 18, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Attorney General, instructed by Zainul Abedin, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Ali Ahmed Malaker @ Kunai @ Malaker & others Vs. The State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....llants are found not guilty to the charge levelled against them and they be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 401. ......@ Malaker & others..............Appellants Vs. The State……………………………………………………………………………..Respondent. Judgment June 26, 1990. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury ‑ For the Appellants. Enamul Hoque ‑For the State...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Giasuddin Ahmed and others vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....rit Petition No.1380 of 2009. An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Judgment Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J.- Initially on 22.2.2009 the Rule was issued calling upon the respondent to show cause as to why 5A as inserted in the Bangladesh......and others.................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others………………………Respondents Judgment October 11, 2010. Cases Referred To- 48 DLR (AD) 20; 49 DLR 257. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Mustafizur Rahman, Advocate-For the Peti..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 145
Sk. Abul Qasem and others Vs. Mayez uddin Mondal and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. ABM Nurul Islam with Md. Nawsher Ali Mollah, Advocates ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.2540 of 1990. Judgment Muhammad Ansar Ali J.- This Rule arises out of an application by the defendant‑petitioners under section 115(1) of the Code of.......................Petitioner Vs. Mayez uddin Mondal and others........................Opposite Parties Judgment January 15, 1992. Cases Referred To- 28 DLR 123; AIR 1928 (PC) 277. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. ABM Nurul Islam with Md. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 84
....the Petitioner.
Kh. Saiful Huque, Advocate ‑ For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No.345 of 1985 (Dhaka) and Writ Petition No.23 of 1989 (Rangpur).
Judgment
AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- By this Rule Nisi the respondents were called upon to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order p......Amin Choudhury J
North Bengal Paper Mills Ltd..............Petitioner
Vs.
The Chairman Labour Court, Lakshmipur, Rajshahi and others...............Respondents
Judgment
July 1, 1991.
Lawyers Involved:
Khalilur Rahman with Sheikh Abul Hossain and Syeda Afsar Jahan, Advocates ‑ F..
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Arshad Ali Vs. Momtaz Ali and another, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....page 349 (355) Lawyers Involved: SR Karmaker, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. No one ‑ For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.102 of 1986. Judgment Muhammad Ansar Ali J.- This Rule at the instance of the plaintiff-petitioner calls in question the judgment and order dated 19......titioner Vs. Momtaz Ali and another................. Opposite Party Judgment December 9, 1991. Cases Referred To- Ganeshmal Vs. Kesorain Cotton Mills Ltd., 55 CWN page 349 (355) Lawyers Involved: SR Karmaker, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. No one ‑ For the Opposite Pa..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Chittagong Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Chittagong and another, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....lehuzzaman, Deputy Attorney General‑ For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.524 of 1987. Judgment Mainur Reza Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the petitioner Chittagong Textile Mills Ltd. a Rule Nisi was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution calling upon the respondents to show caus......e State of West Bengal and another; Hemanta Kumar Bhattacharjee Vs. SN Mukherjee; Akloo Vs. Chief Engineer Officer, Corporation of Calcutta; R. Jeevaraninam Vs. State of Madras, AIR 1966 (SC) 951. Lawyers Involved: Khalilur Rahman with Syeda Afsar Jahan, Advocates‑ For the Petitioner. AY ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Moyezuddin Mondal Vs. Bena Rani Das & others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
.... Rajbari in Title Suit No.42 of 1988 rejecting the petitioner's prayers for admitting or receiving some documents in evidence and for amendment of the plaint. 2. Facts relevant for disposal of the Rule may briefly be stated as follows: The plaintiff‑petitioner instituted a suit being Title S......992. Cases Referred To- MA Jahangir and others Vs. Abdul Hakk and others, 41 DLR page 389; Kanda and others Vs. Waghu, 3 DLR (PC) 310; Fazal Elahi @ Sk. Fazat Elahi Vs. Shah Alam, 25 DLR 62. Lawyers Involved: ABM Nurul Islam with Md. Nawasher Al Mollah, Advocates ‑ For the Petitioner. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Mansur Ali (Md.) Vs. Janata Bank and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
.... Involved: MA Rahim, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Sheikh Razzaque Ali, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 136 of 1987. Judgment Habibur Rahman Khan J. - This Rule was issued at the instance of the plaintiff No. 2 petitioner calling upon the opposite parties ......d Sons Lid, Vs. Damodar Corporation, AIR 1967 (SC) (Pat) 96; Tirkha Vs. Ghosi Ram, AIR 1955 (All) 842; Demur Mohan Vs. Jagdip Mohon, AIR 1936 Patna 535; AIR 1966 (Cal) 272(277); 8 PLR (Dhaka) 820. Lawyers Involved: MA Rahim, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Sheikh Razzaque Ali, Advocate ‑..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Naogaon Chitrabani Ltd. Vs. Naogaon Cinema Hall Sramajibi Union and another, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
.... Syeda Afsar Islam, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioners. ML Bhowmik with SN Goswami, Advocates For the Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 563 of 1987. Judgment Nurul Huque Bhuiyan J. - This Rule Nisi obtained by the petitioner under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic ......bani Ltd. a limited liability Co. & others……….........Petitioners Vs. Naogaon Cinema Hall Sramajibi Union and another.....................Respondents. Judgment June 26, 1990. Lawyers Involved: Khalilur Rahman with Sk. Abul Hossain and Syeda Afsar Islam, Advocate ‑ For t..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 115
....
Aminul Huq, Attorney‑General with Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, Assistant Attorney General ‑ For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 12 of 1991.
Judgment
Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J. - This Rule Nisi was issued upon an application under Article 102(2)(b)(i) of the Constitution of the Peopl......Bengal (AIR 1973 (SC) 844); Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 31 DLR (AD) 1; Mrs. Tahera Chowdhury Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 40 DLR 193.
Lawyers Involved:
Rafiq‑ul‑Huq with Md. Azizul Huq, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner.
Aminu..
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Silver Estate Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim Mia and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....the defendants over the title of the suit property. In that view of the matter cross‑objection filed by the respondent No. 1 is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 360. ......ah Vs. Ezazuddin Ahmed, 13 DLR 554; Administrator of Wakfs Vs. Mst. Sahere Khatun, 28 DLR 238; Pitchayya Vs. Venkataramayya, AIR 1943 Mad 497; Jaggo Bai Vs. Hari Har Prosad Singh, PLD 1947 PC 406. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with HR Sharif with Shima Jahur, Advocates ‑ For t..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abul Hashem alias Bachhu Vs. Abdul Latif, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....d. Abul Hashem alias Bachhu……………..Petitioner Vs. Abdul Latif being dead his heirs (Ka) Rojia Khatun and others……….Opposite parties Judgment May 21, 2009. Result: The Rule is made absolut. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta-For the petitioner. No one-For the......u……………..Petitioner Vs. Abdul Latif being dead his heirs (Ka) Rojia Khatun and others……….Opposite parties Judgment May 21, 2009. Result: The Rule is made absolut. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta-For the petitioner. No one-For the opposite parties. Civi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
51795177517651755171517051695168516451625156515551545153515251515150514851475146