Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3261-3280 of 6261 results.
Anika Ali Vs. Rezwanul Ahsan, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....ammad Imman Ali J. - This Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 23.02.2011 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4310 of 2010 disposing of the Rule, with observations and a direction upon the parties to strictly follow the terms and conditions......Laily Begum Jalil, 50 DLR (AD) 55; Abu Baker Siddique Vs. SMA Bakar, 38 DLR (AD) 106; Hossain Muhammad Ershad Vs. State, 21 BLD (AD) 69; The State Vs. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 60 DLR 660. Lawyers Involved: Md. Asaduzzaman, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 327
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Mustafizur Rahman Kanchan, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....ereby condoned. 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.04.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1086 of 2009 disposing of the Rule by some observation and directions upon the parties as follow: A. The petitioner is exempted......J Muhammad Imman Ali J Government of Bangladesh and others.................Petitioner Vs. Md. Mustafizur Rahman Kanchan.........................Respondent Judgment April 7, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Mustafa Jaman Islam, Deputy Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 96
M. Akbar Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... also prayed that the respondents No.2 and 3 be restrained from approving the Ad-hoc Committee which was submitted by the local Member of Parliament for approval. 3. At the time of issuance of the Rule on 19.10.2009 the parties were directed to maintain status quo in respect of Ad-hoc Committee o...... M. Akbar Ali, son of late Akel Ali...............Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment May 26, 2011. Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Sujan, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Rec..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 148
Bera Pourashava and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... Muhammad Imman Ali J. - Leave was granted to consider the judgment and order dated 11.05.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.5036 of 2002 discharging the Rule and thereby affirming the order of curtailment of an area of Bera Paurashava made under S.R.O. ......zid ..............................Petitioner (In Civil Appeal No.126 of 2006) Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others.......Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment June 07, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior advocate instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Lutfun Nessa and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ave to Appeal Nos. 1996 & 2029 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated the 6th day of July, 2009 passed by the High Court Division in Appeal from Original Decree No.387 of 2003 with Civil Rule No. 697(f) of 2003). Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ. - These Petitions for Leave to Ap......¦â€¦â€¦.........Petitioner (In Civil Petition No.1996 of 2009.) Vs. Lutfun Nessa and others………………………..........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment August 5, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Biswajit Das, Deputy Attorney General instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advocate-on..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Sudhansu Kumar Barai and others Vs. Abul Hashem and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....dvocates ‑For the Petitioners. Tapan Kumar Chakroborty, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Revision Case No. 211 of 1986. Judgment Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J. - This Rule is directed against an order dated 28.6.86 passed by Mr. Manjur Kader, Upazila Munsif, Banaripa......nt: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Sudhansu Kumar Barai and others........Petitioners Vs. Abul Hashem and others ...................Opposite Parties. Judgment February 7, 1990. Lawyers Involved: Mujibur Rahman Talukder for PC Guha, Advocates ‑For the Petitioners. Tapan..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Sadharan Bima Corporation Vs. Bangladesh Shipping CorÂporation and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....ependently in accordance with law. Parties are at liberty to take back their respective documents and Exhibits on giving proper receipt. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 322. ......D) 110; Albert David (Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. M/s. Nedlloyd Lijnel BV Rotterdam, 34 DLR (HC), 356; Kings Shipping Traders Vs. M/s. AS Line and others, 38 DLR (HC), 30; Batuit Vs. Hartley, (1872) Maritime Law Cases (QB), 337; Bengal Liner Ltd. Vs. Sadharan Bima Corporation and another, 1990 BLD 105. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Dulal and others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....s should be released on bail on furnishing fresh bail bond to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh within two (2) weeks. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 321. ......dul Bari Sarker J Dulal and others..............................Petitioners Vs. The State…………………………………………….Respondent. Judgment August 23, 1990. Lawyers Involved: S M G Amirullah Chowdhury, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioners. J K Paul, Advoc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mojibur Rahman Sarker and others Vs. Shafiqul Islam and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
.... am, therefore, of the opinion that the learned Assistant Judge committed an error of law resulting in an error in the decision occasioning failure of justice in passing the impugned order. 4. The Rule is thus made absolute and the impugned order set aside. I further allow the application for ame......ikash Roy Choudhury J Mojibur Rahman Sarker and others...............Petitioners Vs. Shafiqul Islam and others...........................Opposite Parties. Judgment February 7, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Bazlur Rahman Talukder, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented-the..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....1.91. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the legal position discussed above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed for a period of one (1) month from date. This Rule is made absolute accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 312...........................Opposite Party. Judgment February 12, 1991. Cases Referred to- Sh. Zahoor Ahmed Vs. State, PLD (1974) Lahore 256; Golam Sarwar Kamal Vs. State, 1985 BLD (AD) 110. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbub Hossain with Khandker Gulzar Hossain, Advocates ‑For the Peti..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Haque and Company Limited Vs. M/s. Western Soap Factory and others, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....er. Abdur Rashid Khan, Advocate ‑ For the Respondents. Matter No. 37 of 1988. Judgment Md. Mozammel Hoque J. -In this application under sections 37 and 46 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940 a Rule was issued directing the Respondents to show cause as to why the Registration No.23048 dated 31........Respondents. Judgment April 4, 1990. Cases Referred to- Chiswick Products Ltd. Vs. The Registrar of Trade Marks, Karachi and another, PLD 1975 (Kar) 421; 1899 Appeal Cases page 428. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Abdur Rashid Khan, Advocat..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 219
Rustom Ali Vs. Jamila Khatun, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....of Mulla's Principles of Mohamedan Law providing that past maintenance is not available to a Muslim wife is applicable in this country. 12. In the result, this revisional application succeeds. The Rule is, accordingly, made absolute. 13. The judgment and order of the learned Subordinate Judge ......mmad Bashir, Defendant‑respondent, PLD, 1958 (WP) (Lahore), 596; A Fulteh Moulvie, defendant Vs. Zabunnessa Khatun, plaintiff, Indian decision (Cal) 1881, Vol‑III and ILR 6 and 7 Calcutta 631. Lawyers Involved: Gour Gopal Saha, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 253
Captain Shamsul Alam Chowdhury Vs. Shirin Alam Chowdhury, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....nur Reza Chowdhury J Captain Shamsul Alam Chowdhury ..........Petitioner Vs. Shirin Alam Chowdhury..........................Opposite Party. Judgment January 24, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Moinuddin (Md.) Vs. Amina Khan Majlish, 42 DLR 483. ......hury..........................Opposite Party. Judgment January 24, 1991. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Moinuddin (Md.) Vs. Amina Khan Majlish, 42 DLR 483. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim with Kazi Anowar Hossain, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 230
AHM Kamaluddin another Vs. The State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... Judgment Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J. - This is an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure by accused petitioners. AHM Kamaluddin and MA Karim for issuing a Rule calling upon the State to show cause why the order dated 6.8.89 passed by Mr. Munsif Ali, Divis......an J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J AHM Kamaluddin another……………….Petitioners Vs. The State....................................Opposite Party. Judgment August 21, 1989. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Khandker, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented-the O..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Hakim and others Vs. The State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....wyers Involved: Lutfur Rahman Mondal, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented-the Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 243 of 1986. Judgment Anwarul Hoque Choudhury J. - This Rule is directed against an order admitting into record, in a pending trial, certain statements, rec................................Opposite Party. Judgment February 15, 1990. Cases Referred to- Zeheda Bewa and another Vs. The State, 37 DLR at page 66; AIR 1936 Privy Council at page 253. Lawyers Involved: Lutfur Rahman Mondal, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented-the O..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
...., Advocates‑For the Petitioner.
Shamsul Huq Chowdhury with Abdur Rahman Advocates‑ For the Opposite Parties.
Civil Revision No. 391 of 1990.
Judgment
Mahmudul Amin Chowdhury J. - This Rule was earlier issued under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 15â€......Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Mia, 29 DLR (SC) 311; Sultan Ahmed Vs. Puma Chandra Karmakar and others, 28 DLR 131; Alokeshi Bank Vs. Aftabuddin, 13 DLR 871; Daguram Mandal Vs. Omela Sundari Bewa, 12 DLR 626.
Lawyers Involved:
Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Md. Shahidul Alam Chowdhury, Advocates‑For th..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Abdur Rashid Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....he above Criminal Revision No. 8 of 1988 before the learned Sessions Judge who by the impugned order rejected the prayer for referring the case to this Court. The petitioner then obtained the present Rule. 4. Mr. Syed Ziaul Karim, the learned Advocate for the petitioner first contended that as th......thers, 28 DLR 1; Abdus Salam Master alias Salam and another Vs. The State, 36 DLR (AD) 58; Falak Sher and others Vs. State, 19 DLR (SC) 426; Abdul Hossain Sana Vs. Swalal Agarwala, 14 DLR (SC) 96. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. AKM Zahirul Huq with MA R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Birendra Nath Chakraborty Vs. Subal Chandra Biswas and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... SS Halder, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. BN Chowdhury with Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocates ‑ For the Opposite Party No. 2. Civil Revision No. 72 of 1978. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J. - This Rule obtained u/s. 115(old) of the Code of Civil Procedure arises out of an application u/s. 96 of t......ed to- Salimuddin Mondal Vs. Mohitosh Biswas, 14 DLR 796; Diam‑Hossain Vs. Haran Das, 13 DLR 283; Asimannessa Vs. Md. Asebar Sheikh, 19 DLR 659; Tamizuddin Ahmed Vs. Gu1jan Bibi; 26 DLR 93. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. BN Chowdhury with Kazi Ebadul Hu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 78
State Vs.Joynal Abedin and another, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....l Haque, Advocate ‑For the State. Joynal Abedin and Abdul Malek Sardar, Contemners (appeared in person). Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 19 of 1989. Judgment Abdul Bari Sarker J. - This Rule was issued on the basis of Memo No. 428 dated 6.12.78 of the Court of District Judge, Jhalakati......i Sarker J Abdul Hasib J State...................................................Petitioner Vs. Joynal Abedin and another......................Other Party. Judgment May 17, 1990. Lawyers Involved: M Shamsul Alam, Deputy Attorney General with AKM Zahirul Haque, Advocate ‑For..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
....formance of contract is dismissed.
There will, however, be no order as to costs. Let the lower Court's records be sent down immediately.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 256.
......ical Industries Corporation & others................Appellants
Vs.
Grand Basia Company Limited & others ...................................Respondents.
Judgment
March 12, 1990.
Lawyers Involved:
M Zahir with Ferdousi Shahab, Md. Firoz Shaha and FKMA Mahabub, Advocates ‑ F..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
51455144514351425140513851365135513351325130512951285127512651245123512251205119