Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3281-3300 of 8188 results.
....y ground to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 9 ADC (2012) 169.
......te-on-Record- For the Appellants.
Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.1.
Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-3.
Civil Appeal No. 223 of 2007.
(From the judgment and order dated 06.02.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.5599 of 2004).
Judgm..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 739
....
(Civil)
Present:
Md. Muzammel Hossain CJ
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J
Nazmun Ara Sultana J
Syed Mahmud Hossain J
Muhammad Imman Ali J
Md. Shamsul Huda J
Government of Bangladesh and others.................Petitioners
Vs.
Dhaka Match Industries Co.......Petitioners.
Anisul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents.
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 996 of 2011.
(From the judgment and order dated 28.04.2011 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2676 of 2011).
Judgm..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Engineer A. B. Siddique Vs. Kazi Akramuddin and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....tself on 20.11.2003 within the knowledge of the writ-petitioner and they submitted their reports in the matter. Both the inquiry reports revealed that R.S. plot No.1435 is not an acquired land of the Government and that it is owned by writ-respondent No.7. The inquiry reports also disclosed that the......tructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1193 of 2011. (From the judgment and order dated 03.10.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.6864 of 2004). Order..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
....llate Division
(Civil)
Present:
Md. Muzammel Hossain CJ
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
Md. Abdul Wahab Miah J
Nazmun Ara Sultana J
Syed Mahmud Hossain J
Md. Shamsul Huda J
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and another.........Appellants
Vs.
Md. Sha......
Rokunuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate (with Mahbub Ali, Advocate), instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents.
Civil Appeal No.59 of 2011.
(From the judgment and order dated 23.11.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.7625 of 2009.)
Judgm..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 138
Mampower Ltd. Vs. Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....tions made by the High Court Division could not be sustained and accordingly they are expunged. The petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ....... Yusuf Hossain Humayun, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.682 of 2011. (From the judgment and order dated 17.1.2011 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.6477 of 2010.) Judgme..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
....uzammel Hossain CJ
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J
Nazmun Ara Sultana J
Syed Mahmud Hossain J
Muhammad Imman Ali J
Md. Shamsul Huda J
The Chief Engineer, the Local Government and Engineering Department LGED Bhaban, Agargaon, Shere-E-Bangla Nagar,Dhaka...................117-120 (In Civil Petition No.1084 of 2011)
Not represented-Respondent Nos.13-18 (In Civil Petition No.1085 of 2011)
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.767 of 2011.
(From the judgment and order dated 18.08.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.5667 of 2008.)
With
..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 172
....High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Mainur Reza Chowdhury J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Ali Hossain Fakir (Md.) and 5 others………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs,......p; 4134 of 1997.
Judgment
Mainur Reza Chowdhury J.- These applications under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh by the petitioners are directed against the order contained in Memo No. Swa: Ma/Pv-1 Bibidha-7/96/279, Memo No. Swa: Ma/Pv.1 Bibidha-7/96/280, M..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Khairul Bashar (Md.) and 8 others Vs. Collector of Customs and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....on the basis of tariff value which was in force on the date when the Bill of Entry was presented for assessment of customs duty. In that decision it has been noticed that tariff value is fixed by the Government according to the suggestions of the high powered committee. In that case it has been held......ing at the time of opening of the letters of credit on the basis of SROs published before the date of opening of the letters of credit has been adversely affected. Since under the impugned assessment orders customs duties have been charged on the basis of SROs issued subsequent to the date of openin..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Kamal Miah (Md.) alias Nasim Vs. State and another, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....nal Procedure, in a criminal appeal notice is required to be given to the appellant after the appeal is ready regarding the time and place where the appeal will be heard and also to an officer as the Government may appoint in this behalf. Except section 422 of the Code of Procedure, there is no othe......e home, the local chowkider told him that his appeal was dismissed and warrant of arrest was issued then he went to the Court and came to learn that his appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order of the Court. The learned Advocate has also submitted that as the Court exempted the petitione..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Sentu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....LR (HCD) (1998) 220.......ney‑General‑ For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.2243 of 1997. Judgment Mahfuzur Rahman J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon respondents to show cause as to why the judgment and order passed by Special Tribunal No.5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Dhaka on 4‑5‑13..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Dr. Professor MA Hadi Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....edies are available, to the petitioner under Article 52 of the Presidents Order No.11 of 1973 by way of appeal to the Vice-Chancellor or by going to the Administrative Tribunal as the petitioner is a Government servant. But the petitioner did not exhaust them before coming to this Court. He further ...... Chaklader, Advocate - For Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Writ Petition No.3471 of 1996. Judgment KM Hasan J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the impugned order as contained in Annexure-C should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority a..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Raquibuddin Ahmed Vs. SAM Iqbal and another, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....contemner No.1 asked one of his subordinates to write to Shipping Ministry for necessary instruction. But the concerned officer was not authorised to make such correspondence with the Ministry as per Government’s directives which is annexed as Annexure-7 in the affidavit-in-reply. On 7-5-94 the Go......he Petitioner. Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with SM Moonir, Advocates - For the Contemner-Opposite Parties. Civil Rule No.130 (R) of 1994 (Contempt). Judgment Md. Mozammel Hoque J.- As per order of this Court dated 29-7-97 the contemner-opposite party No.1 is present in Court in person. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 142
Kafiluddin (Md.) Vs. Sukkur Ali Mia, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
.... do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 208. ......er. Not Represented - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 430 of 1992. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- In this Rule simple question calls for determination as to why the impugned order dated 7-1-92 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Narsingdi is valid in law or otherw..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
....pecial Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Md. Mozammel Hoque J
Md. Abdul Matin J
Rieta Rahman…………Petitioner
Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others……………Respondents
Judgment
......ic incident of the 15th August, 1975, he became shocked and worried and left the training school in Ahmed Nagar, India, with the consent of the Commandant and returned to Bangladesh through Benapole Border on 20th August, 1975 and as per the Army Rules and Regulations be reported to 55 Brigade Head ..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Bashir Kha Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....et aside. The petitioner is acquitted of the charge and also discharged from his bail bonds. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 199.......torney-General - For the State. Civil Revision No.3141 of 1991 (Dhaka) Civil Revision No.76 of 1985 (Sylhet) Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Session Judge, Sylhet in Criminal Appeal No.16(II)85 affirming the judgm..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 58
....n in any Court or by any authority.”
In section 2(b) of the Ordinance “Authorised Officer” has been defined as “Authorised Officer” means a Magistrate of the First Class appointed by the Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, to exercise all or any of the powers of an Auth......For the Respondent No.1.
Writ Petition No.189 of 1992.
Judgment
Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This Rule has been obtained by the petitioner Chairman, Chittagong Port Authority, against the judgment and order dated 18-6-1991 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Chittagong as an appellate autho..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 103
....on case fails and the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs.
Send down the LC records, at once.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 55; 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 193.
...... For the Petitioners.
Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate - For the Opposite Parties.
Civil Revision No.686 of 1992.
Judgment
Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule calls in question the judgment and order dated 6-2-1992 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Patuakhali in Miscellaneous..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Ibrahim Khalil Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... this section the expression ‘Court of Sessions’ has been used. A Court of Sessions is established under section 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and under sub-section (1) of that section, the Government may appoint a Judge for such a Court and that Judge is called the Sessions Judge. Under s......ey-General - For the State. Criminal Revision No. 2205 of 1991 (Dhaka) Criminal Revision No.28 of 1987 (Jessore) Judgment Hamidul Haque J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Sessions Judge, Satkhira in Criminal Appeal No.31 of 1987 upholding with modific..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 69
....native village Kakabo PS Savar District Dhaka leaving the plain as his only heir to succeed him and since then he has been owning and possessing the suit property peacefully on payment of rent to the Government Acquired Estate. The plaintiffs further case is that while he has been in rightful posses...... releasing the suit property from the list of vested property. It has further been contended by the plaintiff that the SDO, Dhaka who is defendant No.2 in the suit proper enquiry clearly found in his order dated 5-10-76 Ext. 5 that the original tenant Laksham Mondal had died 15 years ago at his nati..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Khodeja Begum & others Vs. Md. Sadeq Sarkar, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....stitution of conjugal rights at present and in future filing of such suits. Let the records of this case be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 181. ...... by any Counter affidavit. 12. The learned Advocate submits that the defendants denied the marriage in their clear and specific pleadings in the written statement. He submits that the plaintiff in order to prove the marriage submitted a forged Kabinnama Exhibit 1 but the register of marriage, the..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
68596858685768566855685468536852685168506849684868476846684568446843684268416840