Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 3401-3420 of 8149 results.

AKM Shahidul Hoque Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....l get a decree for 2,43,505 + 3,66,225.81 = Taka 6,09,730.81 with interest at the rate of 10% from the date of the decree till realisation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 538. ......tiff submitted tender at 4.95% above the estimated cost. The tender committee ultimately, accepted the tender of the plaintiff at 3% above the estimated cost and said defendant No. 16 issued the work order by his memo dated 15‑10‑88. In the work order, the plaintiff was asked to complete the wor..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99

Government of Bangladesh Vs. Syed Rashid Ahmed Ehsan @ Syed Abdur Rashid and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....er of stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. Let a copy of the judgment along with lower Courts record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 49.......l in the facts and circumstances of the case with regard to maintainability of the suit is plainly misconceived inasmuch as in this case the plaintiffs having not challenged the so-called requisition order of the then Pakistan Government. He adds that in the cited decisions namely the decisions repo..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Md. Mosharaf Hossain Sukani Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

....d for. Hence the Rule fails. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Order of stay stands vacated. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 35. ......ge of investigation on 08.09.2004. 7. The informant again filed an application before the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for investigation of the case by RAB and the learned Court vide order dated 06.10.2005 allowed the said application and withdrew the investigation from CID and dire..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76

Mollah Shabidul Islam Vs. Md. Monsur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....he application under Order XXI, rules 90 and 91 of the petitioner in accordance with law and with utmost expedition. No order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 164. ...... Md. Nazrul Islam, Advocate—For Respondent No.2. MB Taj Mohammad, Advocate—For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 5439 of 2003. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule arises out of an order dated 5‑8‑03 passed by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No...

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 61

Adilur Rahman Khan Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)

....hority and are of no legal effect. We are grateful to the members of the bar who have actively assisted us. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 3; 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 100. ......January, 1972. The High Court of Bangladesh Order 1972 (P.O. 5 of 1972) by which under Article 4 High Court declared to be a Court of record and defined its jurisdiction. By P.O. 91 of 1972 the above order was amended and a new Article 6A was inserted by which it was provided that there shall be an ..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 264

Babul Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....and he is acquitted of the same and set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Lower Court's Records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 158. ...... there must be mens rea or guilty knowledge. Existence of mens rea or guilty knowledge is the sine quan non for offence for possessing weapon of crime. 35. It can, thus, hardly be disputed that in order to award and sustain conviction for offence under sections 19(f) and 19(a) of the Act possessi..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Abdul Quddus Vs. Syed Moinul Ahsan Sajjad, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....ipt of this order.  Office is directed to communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 1, 15 BLC (HCD) (2010) 321, 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 166. ......vocate − For the petitioner. Mr. Yusuf HossainHumayun, Advocate, with Mr. Md. Matiar Rahman, Advocate − For the oppositeparty. Civil Revision No. 3056 of 2009. (Against the judgment and order dated 16.8.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Dhaka in Miscellaneous App..

Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 171

Eastern Bank Ltd. and another Vs. Sufia Re‑Rolling Mills and Steel Ltd. and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....d and order of stay granted therein is recalled and vacated. Parties are directed to bear their own cost. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 530. ......p was though beached at the 'Bhatiari' yard at Chittagong of the plaintiffs but was in overall control and management of the bank. The bank used to supply the scraps on the basis of issue of delivery order (DO). The weightage of the ship was 7880 metric ton but the bank gave them 3500 MT of scraps o..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92

Abdullah (Md) and others Vs. Majibul Huq and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....No. 14 dated 30‑5‑2001 be set aside and the application dated 20‑5‑2001 be allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 528. ......ab, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioners. No one ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3970 of 2001. Judgment M Hussain Haider J. - In this Rule the plaintiff petitioner challenged order No. 14 dated 30‑5‑2001 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Sonagazi, Feni in Title Suit..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 75

Dr. Ahmed Husain Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Telegraph and Telephone Board, Dhaka and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)

.... without any order as to cost. Stay order granted earlier in respect of realisation of the disputed portion of VAT is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 115. ......avit-in-opposition of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 6. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary to the Ministry of Finance and Internal Resources Division, who was added as the respondent No.3 by an order of this Court dated 21-10-97, also by filing an affidavit-in-opposition challenged the petitio..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 138

Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....h the observation that this judgment will have no bearing on the fate of the Partition Suit/Appeal . There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 525. ......adesh was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the respondents should not be directed to mutate the name of the petitioners in the records of right pursuant to the judgment and order dated 26‑7‑1995 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2819 of 1994 which..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67

Animal Protection Society Chittagong Vs. Laxman Chadra Das & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....he deposit account of the Public Account of the Republic as provided under section 10(2) of the Ordinance. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 522. ......eclaration is that the plaintiff alone has got the right to receive the compensation as awarded in LA Case No. 26 of 1998‑99. It has not prayed for any relief whatsoever against any action taken or order made in the acquisition proceeding. 9. The declaration was sought for on, amongst other ave..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61

Abdul Gafur alias Kana Mia and others Vs. Md Nurul Islam, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....ed Magistrate would be at liberty to consider the bail of the accused-petitioner. Communicate this order to the Court concerned at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 519. ......nder sections 464/465/467/468/469/471/109 of the Penal Code for forging the document dated 13‑3‑1997 (i.e. agreement) by false personation. Upon receipt of the complaint the learned Magistrate by order dated 21‑11‑1999 sent the complaint to the District Anti‑Corruption Officer (DACO), Habi..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 94

IFIC Bank Ltd. and others Vs. Beximco Holdings Ltd. and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....ion for temporary injunction is also dismissed. Connected Civil Rule No. 654 (FM) of 2004 is accordingly disposed of. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 154.......cates­—For the Respondents. First Miscellaneous Appeal No.304 of 2004 with Civil Rule No. 645(FM) of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- Defendants presented the appeal against an order dated 27‑10‑2004 passed by Joint District Judge, Court No.5 in Dhaka in Title Suit No.191 ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Abdur Rashid Chowdhury Vs. CA Hamid and Co. Ltd. and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....he register of members of the company. Respondent No.2, Registrar, is directed to rectify the share register of the company, accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 148. ......oner and approval of transfers of the shares by such reconstituted board could be considered in disposing of the application for rectification of share register under section 43 of the Act. 29. In order to appreciate the conflicting submissions of the learned Advocates on the issue, I must first ..

Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 232

Rafiqul Alam (Md.) MD Dhaka Mercantile Co‑operative Bank Ltd. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

.... is hereby quashed. The petitioner is discharged from the bail bond. The order of stay granted earlier by this court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 145. ......n under section 241A Cr.P.C. for discharge on the ground that the first information report, police report and the documents submitted therewith did not disclose any offence. The learned Magistrate by order dated 28‑9‑03 rejected the said application and framed charge against the petitioner under..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89

Safiqur Rahman (Md.) and others Vs. Ambia Khatoon and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

.... Case No.5 of 1998 as passed at the time of the issuance of the Rule for a period of 3(three) months and subsequently extended is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 143. ......Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.1436 of 2002. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- By this Rule the opposite parties Nos. 1‑7 were called upon to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order No.76 dated 30‑1‑2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, Court No.2, Noakhali in Miscella..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52

SMA Matin Sarker Vs. Bangladesh Jute Mills Association and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....judgment be sent to the Secretary, Ministry of Law, for his perusal and necessary action and the Secretary, Law Reforms Commission, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 128. ......was an employee of the Bangladesh Jute Mills Association (hereinafter called 'the Association'), the respondent No.1. His services has since been terminated. The petitioner has filed this case for an order for winding up of the Association pursuant to the provision of section 241(v) of the Act. It w..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 144

Chief Election Commi­ssioner and 3 others Vs. Controller and Auditor General of Bangladesh and 4 others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....already been deducted earlier, on account of pension. In the result, this Rule Nisi is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 113. ......ng the petitioners to refund and deduct the amount granted and paid/payable to the petitioners as gratuity and net pension and withholding payment of their monthly salary/remuneration pursuant to the orders vide (i) Memo dated 17‑3‑2002 issued by respondent No.2 (ii) Memo dated 21‑11‑2002 is..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 99

Daulatpur Ice Cold Storage Ltd. and another Vs. Chairman, Power Development Board and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)

....­1994 evidenced by Annexure 'H' to the application is declared to have been issued without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 109. ......d for bail. But their bail was rejected and the learned Magistrate ultimately, found that the petitioner has stolen 91,200 units of power and convicted the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 others and passed an order imposing a fine of Taka 10,000 upon each of the accused in default to suffer rigorous imprison..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 135