Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Moyezuddin and another Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ...... witness is not material for our purpose. Mr. Khandker has found it difficult to show any contradicĀtion in his evidence, though he has other submissions to make but they are beyond the scope of the leave order. 13. It is also to be observed that the court of appeal below has taken note of all ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chittagong Vs. Mst. Safiya Bai, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....n of the applicants as the question has been rightly answered by the High Court. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 41. ......vil Appeal No.72 of 1977. On appeal from the judgment dated May 18, 1973 pasted by the High Court Division in Reference Case No. 1 of 1972. Judgment Ruhul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave arises out of the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Reference Case No..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Bangladesh Vs. Moslem Mia, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......Appeal No. 139 of 1977. On appeal from the judgment and order dated July 26, 1970 passed by the High Court in Civil Rule No.729(f) of 1970. Judgment Rahul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave is from the judgment dated July 20, 1970 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of East ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 19.03.2003 8s 23.03.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 2344 of 1998.) Judgment M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal. is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 19.03...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......gh Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2542 of 2000.) Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J.- Delay of 08 days is condoned. 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2002 passed by ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1740 of 1995). Judgment: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - The added defendant No. 3 as the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 3rd August, 2003 passed by the High Court Divi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ......d 25.10.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5732 of 2004). Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 25.10.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the H..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ......inistrative Appellate Tribunal in Miscellaneous Appeal No.04 of 2003.) Judgment MM Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.06.2005 passed by the Administ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rammonhat Road, four persons came out of a tea stall and asked them whose names were Zaved and Sohel and there was a white micro-bus nearby and those persons told that the mother of Murad Huzur was sick and as such they took Sohel and Zaved inside the micro-bus and he (P.W.) ran to the School an......ed 21.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1891 of 1998.) Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.03.2004 passed by a Division Be..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 29-8-2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 9 of 1993). Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.08.2003 passed by a Division Be..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......d 1st June 2002 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. 69 of 1995). Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This civil petition for leave to appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 1.6.2002 passed by the Administrative Ap..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Abdul Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Jahura Khatun and Others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s any instance of misreading and non-reading. So the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below can not be disturbed. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......ted 19th January, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1178 of 1990). Judgment: Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This civil petition for leave to appeal at the instance of the defendant-petitioner arises out of the judgment and order da..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......d 15.04.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 492 of 2001). Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Defendant-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.04.2003 passed by a Single Bench of the Hig..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated December 13, 1995 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2130 of 1993) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated December 13, 1995 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Not represented- For respondent No. 2. Civil Review Petition No.43 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 13th August, 2001 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 1030 of 1997). Judgment: &n..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ondent No.1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-4 Civil Appeal No. 353 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 14-8-2002 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 1290 of 2000). Judgment: &nbs..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Case No. 12532 of 2003). Judgment: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ.- This criminal petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th January, 2005 passed by the ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......d—For the Respondent. Judgment: Md Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant's appeal by leave against the judgment of June 12, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......Revision No. 809 of 1991). Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendants' appeal by leave against the judgment dated June 24, 1996 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 809..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36