Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3441-3460 of 6261 results.
....e Petitioners.
Md. Ashadullah, Advocate—For Respondent No. 1.
M Saleem Ullah, Advocate—For Respondent No. 3.
Writ Petition No. 8236 of 2002.
Judgment
Md. Muzammel Hossain J. - This Rule Nisi was issued at the instance of the petitioner calling upon the respondents to show cause as......arayanganj Vs. Bangladesh Bank & ors, 45 DLR 8; Shahajadi Begum Waqf Estate Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Communication (Roads and Railway), Dhaka & another, 2001 BLD (AD) 59 = 7 BLC (AD) 41.
Lawyers Involved:
Mainul Hosein with Hassan MS Azim, Bepul Bagman Advocates—For the Petitioners..
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 251
Dr. Md. Abu Obaidah Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....tted a return for the assessment year 1994-1995. The assessee claimed exemption of Taka 72,000 on account of house rent allowances drawn from Sonear Laboratories Limited according to the provision of Rule 33(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1984. The Deputy Commissioner of Taxes disallowed such exemption......hhab Mian J Zinat Ara J Dr. Md. Abu Obaidah……………………………..Applicant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes ……………………….Respondent. Judgment April 26, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mojibur Rahman with Md. Abdul Quddus, Advocates—For the Appellant. Kaz..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Huang Chia Hsiang Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Md. Sabed AH. Assistant Attorney-General. Sheikli Tainuir Reza Hasan, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 437 of 2001. Judgment Md. Muzammel Hossain J. - This Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioner calling upon the respondents to show cause as to w...... Bangladesh & others, 2004 BLD 365 = 9 BLC 613; Mahmudul Haque (Md.) Vs. Md. Hedayetullah and others, 48 DLR (AD) 128; Abu Bakkar Siddique Vs. Justice Shahabuddin Ahmed & others, 49 DLR 1. Lawyers Involved: Bashir Ahmed, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Zaman Akhter, Deputy Attorney-G..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Shawkat Ali (Md.) and others Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ndents. Writ Petition No. 1605 of 2000 with Writ Petition Nos. 1606, 1682, 1690, 1763, 1683, 1950, 1949, 1347, 1348, 1346, 1319, 1529, 1168, 1181-1183 of 2000. Judgment MM Hossain J. - These Rules have been issued in Writ Petition Nos. 1605, 1606, 1682, 1683,1690, 1763, 1950, 1949, 1950, 19......nd others………..Respondents. Judgment February 16, 2006. Cases Referred to- Jibendra Kishore Vs. East Pakistan, 9 DLR (SC) 21; Oali Ahad Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 26 DLR 376. Lawyers Involved: AF Hassan Ariff with Khaleda Zaman, Advocates— For the Petitioner (In Writ Pe..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 551
Ashique Jeans Apparels Ltd and another Vs. National Board of Revenue and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....lam, Assistant Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 2 (In Writ Petition No. 4084 of 2002). Writ Petition Nos. 4083 of 2002 and 4084 of 2002. Judgment Mirza Hussain Haider J. - In both these Rules, the parties and the fact in issue being the same and similar, both are taken up for hearing t......l-151, page 270; Alapati Venkataramiah Vs. CIT (1969) 57 ITR 185; Wabbing & Belting Factory Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT (1961) 43 ITR, 234, 238; CIT Vs. Indian Aluminum Co. Ltd. (1973) 88 ITR 257, 276. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Hoque for Rokonuddin Mahmud, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Kazi W..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Abdur Rahim Chowkider @ Abdur Rahman Sheikh Vs. Raji Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....han, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sadananda Rana, Advocate—For Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 10. Civil Revision No. 112 of 1991. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - Defendant No. 1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦ Petitioner Vs. Raji Haider and others…………………….Opposite Parties. Judgment June 28, 2006. Cases Referred to- 34 DLR (AD) 61; 49 DLR (AD) 73; 6 MLR 199. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mofizur Rahman for AH Md. Shahadat Ali Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Abu Musa Kutub (Md.) Vs. Secretary, Election Commission and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....€”For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 3013 of 2004 Judgment Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J. - In this application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the declaration of the can......Election Commission of India, 1984 SCR 1911; AKM Hasanuzzaman Vs. Election Commission I SCR 493; Election Commissioner of India Vs. Shivaji 1984 Supreme Court Cases 277; Shamsul Haque Vs. Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, 5 BLC (AD) 176. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshed A lam..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 87
....€”For Respondent No. 1.
Md. Salahuddin, Advocate—For Respondent No. 4.
No one appeared—For Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Writ Petition No. 3548 of 2003.
Judgment
Md. Imman Ali J. - This Rule Nisi was issued on an application under Article 102 of the Constitution challenging the constru....... AW Mallik and others, 20 DLR (SC) 229; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Irrigation, Water Resources and Flood Control and others, 49 DLR (AD) 1.
Lawyers Involved:
Tanjibul Alam, Advocate—For the Petitioners.
Fida M Kamal, Additional Att..
Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 484
Nazrul Islam (Md.) and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Petitioners. Mrinal Kanti Biswas, Advocate—For Respondent. Writ Petition No. 6402 of 2004. Judgment Syed Mahmud Hossain J. - In this application under Article 102 of the Constitution a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents is show cause as to why the impugned order under l......…………………………………..Respondents. Judgment June 26, 2005. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Power Development Board and others Vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder 9 BLC (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Mrinal Kanti Biswas, Advo..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 186
Solaman Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....th Farhanat-ul-Alam—For the accused-Petitioner. Snigdha Huq, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 9665 of 2003. Judgment Mir Hashmat Ali J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner Khulna to show cause as to why the impugned jud...... Chowdhury Vs. State, 20 DLR 666; The Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Dhaka & another Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others, 1986 BLD (AD) 189; Shiplu and another Vs. State, 49 DLR 53. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Hasan with Farhanat-ul-Alam—For the accused-Petitioner. Snigdha..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Sk Md. Tariqul Alam and another Vs. ATM Matiul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ty Commissioner Vs. Kobad Ali, 39 DLR (AD) 205. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shahidul Islam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Majumder Saiful Islam, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Rule No. 577(con) of 2004. Judgment Siddiqur Rahman J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the......199 = 2 BLC 599; Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Wahab and others, 45 DLR 30; District Primary Education Officer Vs. Joynal Abedin and others, 40 DLR 328; Deputy Commissioner Vs. Kobad Ali, 39 DLR (AD) 205. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shahidul Islam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Majumder Saiful Isl..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Jamal Ahmed alias Jamal Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....the impugned judgment and order dated 1-11 -2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sylhet in Criminal Appeal No. 124 of 2004, the petitioner preferred this revisional application and obtained the Rule 9. Now, the point for determination is. Whether the judgment and order dated 1-11-2004 passe......te…………………………………………………………………….Opposite Party. Judgment June 29, 2005. Case Referred to- Hakim Rai Vs. State, AIR 1957 (Punjab) 134. Lawyers Involved: ASM Abdul Mobin with Md. Shafqut Hussain—For the Petitioner. Shamim Ara Do..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 65
....y Alam with JN Dcb and Ekramul Hoque. Advocates—For the Petitioner.
Rehana Malek, Advocate—For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 4559 of 2002.
Judgment
Md. Muzammel Hossain J. - This Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioner calling upon the respondents to show cause as to w......J
Engineer Md. Nurul Islam Chowdhury…………………..Petitioner
Vs.
GM, Dhaka Rural Electrification Samity 1 and another ……………Respondents.
Judgment
October 23, 2005.
Lawyers Involved:
Mobbubey Alam with JN Dcb and Ekramul Hoque. Advocates—For the Petitioner.
..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 146
Suratjan Bewa Vs. Md. Abdul Mannaf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... SM Rezaul Karim, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 4932 of 1999. Judgment Syed Refaat Ahmed J. - In this application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite-parties to show cause as to why judgment and decree dated ......t page 750, A Rahman Vs. A Rahim Gazi, 35 DLR 132; Rashida Begum Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement, 1 BLC 138; Miaruddin Vs. Saleh Meher Bibi, 11 DLR 44; AB Sikder Vs. Monowara Begum, 40 DLR 392. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mozammel Haque Bhuiya, Advocate- For the Petitioner. Habibul Islam Bhui..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Aftab Ali Sheikh (Md.) Vs. Director, Land Records and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....i Mohammad Ali, Advocates—For Respondent No. 4. Syeda Afsar Jahan, Deputy Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 4068 of 2002. Judgment Afzal Hossain Ahmed J. - This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order dated 10-7-2001 ......h (Md.).............................................................Petitioner Vs. Director, Land Records and others………………………….Respondents. Judgment April 18, 2006. Lawyers Involved: ABM Nurul Islam with Afifa Begum, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Hasan Foez..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
State Vs. Mokammel Hyeath Khan, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....nment for life. Therefore, it appears that sentence was not given according to the formula devised by the learned Judge. Government, however, did not file any appeal for enhancement of sentence or no Rule for enhancement of sentence was issued at the time of admission of the appeals. 104. We find......n Nahar Begum Vs. State, 27 DLR (AD) 29; Amir Hossain Howlader Vs. The State, 1984 BLD (AD) 193; Bhagat Singh and another Vs. Emperor, AIR 1930 (Lahore) 266; State Vs. Mukbul Hossain, 26 DLR 419. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek with Asaduzzaman, SM Shujahan, Advocates—For the Condemned Prison..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 236
Nasima Akhter Banu Vs. Abu Taher Masud and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....s Involved: Samiron Das Gupta, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Omar Farook, Advocate—For Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 2315 of 2004. Judgment Syed Md. Ziaul Karim J. - This Rule, at the instance of plaintiff-petitioner, calls in question the legality and propriety of the o......rs, 1994 BLD 229 = 46 DLR 273; Moyjuddin Mondol Vs. Bena Rani Das and others, 45 DLR 154; MA Jahangir and others Vs. Abdul Malek and others, 41 DLR 389; Md. Sirajuddin Vs. Mahibunnesa and others, The Lawyers Volume I (AD) 136 and 31 DLR (AD) 133. Lawyers Involved: Samiron Das Gupta, Advocateâ€..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Alauddin (Md.) Vs. State and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....For Opposite-Party No. 1. (In both cases) Snigdha Huq, Deputy Attorney-General -For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case Nos. 118, 8422 of 2003. Judgment Mir Hashmat Ali J. - Both these Rules were issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why impugned order dated 23-...... Nader Ali Sheikh Vs. State and others, 35 DLR 180; Md. Ali Asgar Vs. Md. Esrail and others, 1999 BLD 517; State Vs. Khan Khawas, PLD 1967 Peshawar 23; Osman Gani Vs. Besharuddin Ahmed, 32 DLR 53. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Mostafa, Advocate—For the accused-Petitioner. (In both cases) Md..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Rafiqul Islam (Md.) Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Shamsul Hoque. Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Jamil Akhter Elahi, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal Revision No. 757 of 2001. Judgment Md. Imman Ali J. - This Rule was issued upon an application filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure callin......afiqul Islam (Md.)…………………………………..Petitioner Vs. State…………………………………………………………Opposite Party. Judgment March 6, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamsul Hoque. Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Jamil Akhter Elahi, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Firoz Hossain Shah (Md.) Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Shaflquel Islam Siddique, Advocate—For the Opposite Party No. 2. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 4846 of 2004. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This Rule was obtained for quashment of the proceeding of CR Case No. 85 of 2003 pending in the Court of ...... Vs. State ………………………………………………Opposite Party. Judgment November 16, 2005. Cases Referred to- 1990 BLD (AD) 141; 14 DLR (SC) 18; 51 DLR (AD) 14. Lawyers Involved: Md. Osman Chuni, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Shaflquel Islam Siddique..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
48184817481648144813481248114810480848074806480548024801480047984797479647954794