Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Sirajuddin Vs. Mohibunessa and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....l Huq, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on Record-Respondent No. 2. Ex-parte-Respondent Nos. 1, 3-5. Civil Appeal Nos. 95 of 1994. (From the Judgment and order dated 20.6.1994 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 56 of 1992). Judgmen......he appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. No order is made as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 136. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsu Miah and othÂers Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....zak, Additional attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the respondents (In all the appeals). Civil Appeal Nos.75-86 of 2002. (From the Judgment and order dated June 28, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No. 5756 of 2000 [heard alon...... of those and the Annexure (f), copy of which was not made available to the writ petitioners. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 109. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Abdul Hai and others Vs. Atar Islam and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....yers Involved: Md. Amir Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent No. 10. Civil Appeal No. 170 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 15.02.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3023 of 1994.) Judg......egal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 107. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Gazi Gaiasuddin Vs. Bangladesh Power Development Board and other, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....by, Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Amir Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal Nos. 68 of 2000. From the Judgment and order dated 2nd March, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1845 of 1996.) ...... under the signature of the respondent No.3 is declared to have been passed without lawful authority. There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 103. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Raushan Akhter @ Moharaji Bibi and others Vs. Khandakar Mosharraf Hossian & Ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ts. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-12. Civil Appeal No. 190 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 11th June 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2588 of 1993). ......e presumption that the official has been done regularly in the absence of any evidence to the contrary carry a presumption of regularity to hold that the notice was issued on 21.1.1981. On scrutiny there being no substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants for ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Md. Shamir @ Shamir Khan and others Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-Record-For appellants. Not represented-the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 4.5.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1933 of 1993) Judgme...... period of imprisonment already undergone with a fine of Tk. 1,000/- each in default to suffer imprisonment for one month more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 89. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Dhaka University Vs. Gias Kamal Chowdhury and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....shy;sented-Respondents. (In Civil Petition No. 9 of 2001). Civil Appeal No. 54 of 2001. With Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.9 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 12.7.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2314 of 1999) Judgmen......re the date of publication of preliminary voters list and last date for objections and correction; the last date by which the nomination papers should reach the Registrar; date, time and place for scrutiny of nomination papers; the last date for withdrawal of nomination and date, time ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Arun Karmakar Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....puty Attorney General, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- Respondents No. 1. Not Represented-Respondents No. 2. Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 12th December, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6858 ......n the result, this appeal is allowed setting aside the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 63; 8 MLR (AD) 162; 7 BLC (AD) 61. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Khoka Mollah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ate 46 DLR (HC) page 630; Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-in-Record-For the appellant. Ex-parte-the respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 15.07.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Misc, Case No. 5980 of 1998). Judg......asons and discussions made above, we find no merits in this appeal and as such, it is dismissed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 57; 22 BLD (AD) 229; 8 BLC (AD) 176. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Military Estate officer, Dhaka Cantonment Vs. Sk. Mohammad Ali and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-Respondent Nos. 2 to 27. Not represented-Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal No. 29 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 25th March, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 206 of 1995). J......ed for. 9. There is, therefore, no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 46. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Md. Anisur Rahman and others Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....s Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Not represented-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1997. (From the Judgment and Order dated August 8, 1995 passed by the High Court Division Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2560 of 1995......d he signed the same. The seizure list has been marked as Ext-5. The learned Advocate-on-record submits that prosecution case of stealing bricks by the appellants on November 2, 1990 does not stand scrutiny, rather it is seen from the evidence on record that prosecution case has been disproved by..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Laisur Rahman Vs. Most. Nayma Ara Begum and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....r the Appellant. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondents No. 2. Not represented-Respondents No. 1. Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1996. (From the Judgment and Order dated 21.1994 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.1512 of 1992) Judgme......eal is allowed on modification of substantive sentence to the period already under gone, but the sentence of fine is maintained. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 25. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Abdul Aziz Vs. Khaja Abdul Gani and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....or the Appellant. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte- Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 22.6.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3325 of 1997).......ion 561 A of the Criminal Procedure Code. In view of the above the criminal appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 23. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Golam Ambia Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....Md. Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 238 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 4.5.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4559 of 1999). Judgmen...... any person notwithstanding that such person is licensed to possess the same, and may detain the same for such time as it things necessary for the public safety." 6. On a scrutiny of section 26 of the Arms Act we find that the Government is empowered to seize any arms, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Misir Ali and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.129 of 2006 (From the judgment and order dated 19.11.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.878 of 2003.) Judg......shy;ment of the High Court Division calling for interference by this Court. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 258. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Nantu Biswas and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....puty Attorney General instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Not represented- the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2000. (From the order dated 23.07.1995 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.343 of 1990.) Judgm......rt rightly believed the evidence of the PW 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7,11 and 17 against the respondents and rightly acquitted others having found them not guilty while convicting the respondents on proper scrutiny of evidence but the High Court Division set aside the judgment on allowing the appeal with..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Giasuddin Chowdhury & anr Vs. Military Estate Officer, Central Circle, Dhk, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Munsur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 109 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1810 of 2005) ......any cogent reason to differ with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 248. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Mst. Sufia Khanam Mst. @ Sufia Khatun & another Vs. Md. Abdul Rouf @ Tara Miah, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rd-For the Petitioner (Appeared with the leave of the Court). Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 182 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 13.12.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2716 of 2001.) Judg......ecord arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 217. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 20
Mst. Dorae Anwara Khatun Chowdhury Vs. Shekerernessa and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 729-732 of 2007. (From the judgment dated 24.04.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 3427, 3388, 3391 and 338...... should have been decreed by the appellate court. We find no merit in these petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 214. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Md. Murtoza Ali & anr Vs. Renu Bibi @ Saifur Nessa & ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....For Respondent No.1 (In both the cases). Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1055 and 1056 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 29.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 1805 and 1806 of 1994.) ......e-emption in favour of the respondent pre-emptor. We find no merit in these petitions which are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 203. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25