Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3521-3540 of 8188 results.
Abdul Halim Ukil Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ignal unduly influencing the Magistrates attending his protocol duty to work in a particular manner to serve any purpose of his party or himself. 17. It is true that as per prevalent system of the Government District Administration is duty bound to arrange protocol duty by Magistrates to VIP pers......Learned Advocate refers to copy of petition filed in the Court by accused for time on 07-01‑2004 to move application under section 526 of the Code before the High Court Division and the copy of the order dated 07‑01‑2004 by the Court rejecting the prayer and proceeding with the case, examining..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Foez Ahmed Vs. Joynal Abedin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... and IV respectively, therefore, the concerned Sub-Registrar was bound to follow rule 48 of the Registration Rules. It is also pertinent to mention that the said Rules, 1973 were duly approved by the Government. In view of the discussions made above, I am of the view that noncompliance with the prov...... appeal and affirming the judgment and decree dated 18‑07‑1988 passed by the Assistant Judge, Ramgati in Title Suit No. 9 of 1988 decreeing the suit should not be set aside and/or pass such other order or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Opposite party No. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Jamal Uddin Vs. Mir Kashem Bahumukhi High School and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ot find any substance in the Rule. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 474. ......the Managing Committee and finally dismissed the plaintiff on the ground that on 24‑06‑96 the plaintiff entered into the room of the Head Master over the ceiling, that the plaintiff disobeyed the order of the authority, that he removed some valuable records including the resolution book of the s..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 96
MR Trading Co. Vs. Superintendent Engineer and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....rict Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit by 27‑7‑04, positively. Send down the lower Court's record within three days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 470. ...... First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 138 of 2004 with C. Rule No. 251 (fm) of 2004 and Civil Revision No. 1026 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - Plaintiff presented the above appeal against an order dated 15‑04‑04 passed by Joint District Judge and Arbitration Court at Dhaka in Title Suit..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Chitta Ranjan Mistry and others Vs. Radheshyam Mistry and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ny substance in the Rule. Accordingly, this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and decree is maintained. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 468.......affirming the judgment and decree dated 22‑8‑89 passed by the Assistant Judge, Nesarabad in Title Suit No. 16 of 1989 dismissing the suit should not be set aside and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioners as plaintiffs instit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Syed Abidur Reza and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ttend the office since 10‑9‑81. 6. The plaintiff was a member of the Uttara Bank Karmachari Union. The registration of the union was however, cancelled at the direction of defendant No. 6, the Government of Bangladesh, on 19‑9‑98. Cancellation of registration of the union violated section...... to be taken before the statutory Labour Court created by the Ordinance. 22. Proviso to unamended section 25(1) (b) of the Act at the time reads as follows: “No complaint shall lie against an order of termination of a worker under section 19, unless the worker concerned is an officer of a re..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 174
....urt, however, is directed to dispose of the concerned suit expeditiously.
Communicate this order to the concerned Court immediately.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 749.......ates ‑ For the Opposite Party No.7.
Civil Revision No. 2762 of 1992.
Judgment
Amirul Islam Chowdhury J.- This Rule was issued on the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 to show cause as to why the order dated 15.9.92 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 4th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.162 of 1992 s..
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 181
....n, Court of Settlement and others, 45 DLR 5; Hosne Ara Begum Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and another, Civil Petition Leave to Appeal No.290 of 1990; Civil Petition Leave to Appeal No.6 of 1991; Government of Bangladesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116.
Lawyers Involved:
M I Far......page 9762 (26) against serial number 62 under the caption "Name of areas" Mohammadpur, Block 'F' Dhaka" shall not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and as to why the judgment and order dated 23rd May7 1989 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No.668/88 (Annexure E annexed t..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Madina Vegetable and Oil Refinery Industries (Private) Limited Vs. M T Dolores, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....sistance rendered to me by the learned Counsels in deciding the case. In the facts and circumstances of the case I award no costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 740. ......atements made therein does not disclose any cause of action to attract the jurisdiction of the High Court of Admiralty under section 6 of the Admiralty Court Act, 1861 and consequently the ad interim order of arrest was without jurisdiction and the ship is to be released from arrest and the plaint m..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 383
Raquibuddin Ahmed Vs. Syndicate, Dhaka University and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....on" as claimed by the University Authority in their affidavit-in-opposition. This view of ours is supported by the decision in the case of Hamidul Huq Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh, where a law called the Government‑owned Newspaper (Management) Act (Act XLI of 1975) made provisions for dissolution of s...... Syndicate was required under section 31(3) to send a draft proposal to the Chancellor for amendment of the said clause of the First Statutes setting out the reasons and the object for such change in order that the Chancellor before giving his assent was satisfied that such change in the name of the..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdur Rahman (Md.) & another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....upreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mahmud Hossain J Syed Refaat Ahmed J Abdur Rahman (Md.) & another...........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..............Respondents Judgment July 10, 2004. Result......Miscellaneous Case No. 20 of 2002‑2003 by the respondent No.3 (as contained in Annexure‑'I') shall not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and or such order or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The case of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 113
KM Akhtaruzzaman Vs. Agrani Bank and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... down the records at once. The money deposited by the appellant for filing appeal in the Bankruptcy Court be refunded to the defendant No.3. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 57. ......aled Ahamed, Advocate-For the Respondents. First Appeal No.114 of 2003. Judgment Md. Abdul Matin J.- This appeal under section 96 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 is directed against judgment and order (adjudication) dated 27‑1‑2003 passed by the Additional District Judge and Bankruptcy Cour..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Nur Kader (Md.) Vs. Commissioner of Customs & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....S Paripoornam Vs. State of Kerala, AIR 1995 (SC) 1012; Collector of Central Excise & Land Customs, East Zone, Chittagong and others Vs. Azizuddin Industries Ltd., 23 DLR (SC) 73 and Md. Shoib Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh through the Secretary, Ministry of Industries, Dha......y Attorney‑General-For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.1052 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J.- This Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order dated 1‑3‑2004 passed by respondent No.1 in the file under bill of entry No.C‑3187 dated..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 111
....overy of khas possession therein. The plaintiff alleged that the first schedule land appertaining to Dag No. 5557 belonged to their grandfather, namely, Haji Abdur Rahman who while in possession, the Government temporarily requisitioned the first schedule land vide Case No. 13/B-1947‑1948 and ......Not one appears- For the Opposite Parties.
Civil Revision No. 3699 of 2002.
Judgment
Bijan Kumar Das J.- By this Rule the opposite party No.1 was called upon to show cause as to why impugned order No.104 dated 10‑6‑2002 passed by the Assistant Judge, Gowainghat, Sylhet in Title Suit No...
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Rafia Begum Vs. Afroza Bewa and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....and decree appealed from is hereby affirmed. Send down the lower court’s records at once with a copy of this judgment for information. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 48. ......suit the defendant died and his legal heirs were substituted as defendant Nos. 1(ka) to 1(chha) who contested the suit adopting the written statement filed by their predecessor. 5. At the trial in order to prove the plaint case, the appellant alone deposed as P.W.1. No document was admitted into ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
A Halim (Md.) Vs. Mafijul Islam Tarafder alias Kalu and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....er vacant possession of the suit land to the plaintiff within 30(thirty) days from this date. Send down the lower courts records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 43. ......ed. It was instituted on 29‑9‑1994 before the Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Mymensingh and was registered as Title Suit No.263 of 1994. The PW1 was examined on 2‑3‑1996 in part. On a general order, passed by the District Judge, Mymensingh on 3‑3‑1996 the suit was transferred to the Cour..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Shahid Ali (Md.) and others Vs. Reza Mohammad & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....y. Communicate the order to the courts below at once. Also send down the lower Court's records with a copy of this judgment expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 39. ...... Ali J.- On an application by the petitioner under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon opposite party No. 1 to show cause as to why the Mentioned judgment and order dated 11‑3‑1989 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Nawabganj in Miscellaneous Appeal..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Azam Reza Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....il of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the finding of this case will have no bearing in the trial of the case by the trial Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 36. ......sections 302 and 201 of the Penal Code. The petitioner made prayer for bail and lastly, his prayer for bail was rejected by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka by his order dated 30‑3‑2004 passed in Metropolitan Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.440 of 2004. Thereaf..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 96
....chool) and others reported in 46 DLR 485. Mr. Nurul Amin by referring to regulations 7(1) and 7(2) of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Dhaka (Managing Committee of the Recognised Non-Government Secondary Schools) Regulations, 1977, shortly Regulations, submits that the authority of ...... Advocates-For the Opposite Parties.
Civil Revision No. 4430 of 2002.
Judgment
MA Wahhab Miah J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 8‑6‑2002 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Sirajdikhan, Munshigonj in Title Suit..
Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 72
One Bank Limited and others Vs. Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Limited and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....Developer (Pvt.) Limited and others................Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 620 of 2011) Chaya Developer (Pvt.) Ltd. .........Petitioner (In Civil Petition No. 1428 of 2011) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others ... ……………………………………..Respondents (In ...... Petition No. 620 of 2011). Not represented-For the respondents (In Civil Petition No. 1428 of 2011). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 620 & 1428 of 2011. (From the judgment and order dated 19th January, 2011 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1376 of 2009) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 59
57645763576257615760575957585757575657555754575357525751575057495748574757465745