Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3661-3680 of 4719 results.
Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....or Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Review Petition No. 47 of 2005 (From the judgment and Order dated December 4, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Mahfuzul Hoque and ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....880, 1416-1420, 1390, 109, 1099, 1352-1357 of 2002, and 135-138, 289, 765, 868, 288, 620 of 2003 and 214-218 of 2004). Civil Appeal Nos.76 & 77 of 1994 (From the judgment and order dated 15th August 1994 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1104 and 1152 of 199...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....n-Record- For the Appellants. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 68 of 2004 (From the Judgment and Order dated 12th November 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2468 of 2001) ...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Lawyers Involved: Abu Sayeed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-For the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No. 60 of 2005 (From the judgment and Order dated February 2, 2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1470 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 16th. May, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3948 of 2002) ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ui, Advocate instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-18. Civil Appeal No. 61 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 25.05.1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1233 of 1996.) Jud......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Mokbul Hossain (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Advocate, instructed by Amir Hossain Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Ex parte-The Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 236 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 14-12-2000 passed by the Administrative Tribunal in Appeal No. 51 of 1998). Judgment: ...... Appellate Tribunal did not consider the matter in its proper perspective and accordingly, arrived at a wrong decision. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Appellate Tribunal did not consider the matter in its proper perspective and accordingly, arrived at a wrong decision. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....fia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No.135 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 23rd March, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.1265 of 2000) J......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Mir Kalimuddin and others Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For Respondent No. 1. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 632 of 2002 (From the judgment and decree dated 5-2-2002 passed by the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 205 of 1979). Judgment......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Advocate (Probir Neogi, Advocate with him) instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondents Civil Appeal No. 582 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 17-8-2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2363 of 1998). Judgm......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....-ul Alam, Advocate with him) instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 34 of 1997). Civil Appeal No. 40 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 20-7-1994 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 298 of 1987). and Civil......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No.1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-13. Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2003. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 17, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 876 of 2002). Ju...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....y Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No.1. Not represented— Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Civil Appeal No. 161 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 12-8-2003 passed by the Administrative Appellant Tribunal in AAT Appeal No.147 of 2003). ......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Kadam Rosul Silicate Works and others Vs. Sonali Bank, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....)—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1986. (From the Judgment and Order dated 14th September, 1984 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 287 of 1......is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294.......is set aside. The Money Execution case be struck off and the attachment of the appellants' property shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 294...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Upendra Chandra Rishi and ors. Vs. Sufia Begum and ors., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....h, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent Nos. 1-4. Ex part — Respondent No. 5. Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1985. (From the Judgment and order dated 13.2.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Order No. 98 of 1985). Judgment.......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. .......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Azizul Huq @ Azizul Haque and ors. Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... the Appellants B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by AW Mallik, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent (State). Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1987. (From the judgment and order dated 26 October, 1986 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Criminal Appeal No. 215 of 1986)......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ......he appellants may make a prayer for bail to the High Court Division which should then consider it. This appeal is thus disposed of. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 284 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....enior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-3. Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated May 11 and 12 of 1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2621 of 1998) ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Rabia Bhuiyan, MP Vs. Ministry of LGRD & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....nior Advocate, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte—The Respondents Civil Appeal No.118 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 3-8-1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2879 of 1999) Judgment:......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No.101 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated May 15, 2005 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No.1 of 1999) Judgment Md......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondents Civil Review Petition No. 47 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.19......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
23432342234123402339233823372336233423332332233123302329232723262324232323182317