Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Managing Director, Rupali Bank Limited and others Vs. Tafazal Hossain and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Record-For the Respondent No. 1. Not Represented-Respondent Nos. 2-3. Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1991. From the judgment and order dated 25.2.90 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Civil Order No. 579 of 1990) Judgment: &nbs......a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Assistant Manager, Rupali Bank Vs. Nurul Islam 39 DLR 167. One such decision is that employees of the Rupali Bank were not workers because there was no Gazette Notification bringing them into the definition of "worker" under the Standing Ord..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Sonali Bank and others Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Represented - Respondent Nos. 2-5 in CA No. 61/90. Civil Appeal Nos. 61 & 68 of 1990. (From the Judgment and Order dated 25.3.90 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in first Appeal No. 17 and 19 of 1985 and cross objection No. 18 of 1985). J......not allowed but we allow interest on the decretal sum of Tk. 15,39,300.00 @ 7.1/2% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit upto the date of decree of this Court. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... For the Appellants. M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1990 (From the Judgment and order dated 15th March, 1990 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 204 of 1998 (Sylhet) Judgment: Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by ...... person entitled to execute the decree and that stage did not reach fill then. Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Mozahar Ali Howlader Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......dated 24 April, 1992 (Criminal Revision No. 311 of 1991) refused to quash the proceedings but directed that the trial should be held by the Divisional Special Judge, Khulna, taking the ground that no Gazette Notification was produced by the prosecution showing that the Sessions Judge Jhalakati had b..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 100
AKM Mosharaf Hossain Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hoque, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 1991 (From the Judgment and order dated 18.7.91 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Misc. Case No. 508 of 1991). Judgment: Latifur Rahman J : This appeal is d......are of the view that the appellant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 92
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....d by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 32 of 1990. (From the judgment and order dated 20th November, 1990 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision Case No, 60 of 1986). Judgment:  ......thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Not Represented -For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for leave to appeal No. 17 of 1992. (From the judgment and order dated 22‑1‑92 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Criminal Appeal No. 194 of 1982). Judgment:  ...... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....t before PW 2 China Ranjan Barua, Magistrate, 1st Class, Sadar, Noakhali, which was exculpatory in nature. He stated that he accompanied Abul Khair who was his ex‑colleague as an Army MP from Dhaka to Lakshmipur on a motor cycle for the purpose of seeing his new‑born daughter at Laks......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 2 (State). Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 1990. (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 October, 1989 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Revision No. 90 of 1985). Judgment:  ......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....9;" Special Judges" by the Government. By a notification dated 4 August, 1979 the Government created four temporary Courts of Special Judges, one at each Divisional Head Quarters namely, Dhaka, Rajshahi, Chittagong and Khulna, and they were given jurisdiction to try Special Cases ari...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....epresented‑Respondent No. 2 (In CA 36/1991) Civil Appeal Nos. 100 of 1990 and 36 of 1991 (From the Judgment and Order dated 16th August, 1990 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka In Matter No. 44 of 1988). Judgment: &......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and another .....................Respondent Judgment March 16th, 1992 Law......the existing laws‑that is, "all laws that were in force in Bangladesh on 25th March 1971." Provisional Constitution of Bangladesh Order 1972 was made and published in the Bangladesh Gazette Extraordinary, dated 11th January 1972. This Order, among other things, provided: "Th..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....J Ishaque Khan (Md) and another…………..Appellants Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment October 31st,......rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....r the Respondent No. 1. Ex parte‑Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 16 of‑1989. (From the judgment and order dated 28.5.1989 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Suo Motu Contempt Rule No. 189 of 1989) Judgment:  ......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....#8209;Record‑For the Respondent in both the appeals Criminal Appeal No. 21 & 22 of 1991. (From the Judgment and Order dated 21 August 1991 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Misc. Case No. 506 and 507/91). Judgment: ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....ver got possession of the suit land and that the defendant had been possessing the suit land from the date of this bainapatra i.e., 30.12.72. 5. On appeal the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka by his judgment and decree dated 30.8.84 in Title Appeal No. 301 of 1982, concurred with the f...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Wahidulla, Advocate-on‑Record ‑ For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1991 (From the judgment and order dated 30.10.89 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Criminal Appeal No. 261 of 1986). Judgment: &......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....late Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company ......l be levied on goods specified in the Third Schedule of the Octroi Rules. Item No. 22 of this Schedule provides for exemption of certain Government properties on production of a certificate from a Gazetted Officer of the concerned Department of the Government. Part one of Item No. 22, which is r..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92