Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....le mother of Ataur Rahman Toni, namely, Hashimunnessa Khanam raised hue and cry the accused persons attacked them and assaulted them and that Ataur Rahman Toni being seriously injured was taken to Dhaka Medical College Hospital and was under treatment there and that on the basis of the aforesaid......2003) Not represented-Respondent Nos. 7 &8 (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 189 & 190 of 2003 (From the Judgment and Order Dated 26.11.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 of 2000 an......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ...... Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on- Record-For the Respondents (In Crl. A. No. 15-16/2001) Criminal Appeal No. 14-16 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated 9th December, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 22 of ......al Appeal No.14/2001) Sajjad Shaheen @ Prince...................Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 15/2001) Miraj Hossain...............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respond......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Appellant vs Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi..........Respondent (In all cases) Judgment October 20, 2005. Lawye......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... represented-Respondent Nos. 2-8 Civil Appeal No. 588 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated March 29, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2248 of 1991 (Dhaka)Civil Revision No. 271 of 1984 (Rangpur)) Judgment: &nbs......0/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board, Telejogajog Bhaban, 37/E, Eskaton Garden Road, P. S: Ramna, Dhaka-1000.................. Petitioner vs. Mohammad Toufique and others...................urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R Mudassir Husain CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board, Telejogajog Bhaban, 37/E, Eskaton Garden Road, P. S: Ramna, Dhaka-1000..............paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... one Abdul Jalil who got the same by way of lease from the Government. While possessing the same by making constructions thereon Abdul Jalil with his family members took shelter in Murapara Camp of Dhaka District during the war of liberation. During his temporary absence from the suit property so...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Republic Works and Urban Development…………………….........Appell......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Commissioner of Customs and anr......Appellants (In all the cases) Vs Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka…………………...Respondents (In all the cases) ......Ed. ......raders, Dhaka…………………...Respondents (In all the cases) Judgement October 20, 2003. Cases Referred to- Mr. Ayub and others Vs. Collector of Customs and others, Writ Petition No. 1495 of 1996; Rahmania Vanaspati Product Ltd......n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Bangladesh Krishi Bank Vs. A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.1994 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Administrative Appeal No. 80 of 1992 dismissing the appeal. 2. Short facts are that......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Bangladesh Krishi Bank…….......Appellant Vs A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others .........Respondents Judgement: May 19, 2004. Lawyers Involved: ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gross misconduct. During the pendency of their appeals before the Hon'ble Chief Justice they instituted Title Suit No. 167 of 1996 in the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Dhaka on 01.08.1996 for a declaration that the said order of dismissal was illegal. The learned tri...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.08.1996 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellan......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Resp...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....7 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal (AAT) in Appeal No. 87 of 1996 allowing the same. The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 10.8.1996 of the Administrative Tribunal (AT) Dhaka in Case No. 310 of 1994 dismissing the same. 2. Respondent filed the aforesaid case be......nd). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nts is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.7.2000 passed the High Court Division discharging the rule against judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Second Court, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 136 of 1997 reversing those dated 29.5.1997 of the Assistant Judge, Firs...... Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh & Ors……...Appellants vs A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. ......being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additio...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Rasheda Begum………………….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- ......ip;…….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2348 of 1991 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and decree dated June 29, 1991 of the 2nd Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Dhaka, in Title Appeal No. 77 of 1989 decreeing the suit upon reversing the judgment and decree da...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer, Bangladesh Railway……………......Appellant Vs A.P.M. Basher, Advocate and others .........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved:......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the suit land to the plaintiffs in Poush 1340 B.S. Since then the plaintiffs have possessed the suit land. By amicable partition amongst the co-sharer landlords the suit land fell in the saham of Dhaka Nawab Estate and the plaintiffs subsequently got separate khatian from the Nawab of Dhaka for......ourt of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Saidur Rahman Shahid………………………………...Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement ......r Rahman Shahid………………………………...Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... rule. 2. The relevant facts for disposal of this petition, in short, are that one Mossammat Ambia Khaton as the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.202 of 1965 in the Second Court of Munsif, Dhaka against 237 persons. The said suit was decreed in preliminary form on 22.8.1967 and the decre......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others................ (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others.................Respondents. Judgment M......is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Guru Charan Mondal and others Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ed. Ed. ......vision (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Hamidul Haque J Guru Charan Mondal and others..........................Petitioners Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others..................Respondents Judgment ......not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Shahanaz Begum Vs. Md. Kutubuddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ging the Rule. 2.The revisional application was filed under section 115(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and order dated August 28, 2006 of the Court of District Judge, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 400 of 2006 allowing the same and thereupon setting aside the order dat......Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Shahanaz Begum.....................Petitioner Vs Md. Kutubuddin and others.......Respondents Judgment August 29, 2007. Lawyers Involved: ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abdul Motalib Vs. Iman Ali Mollah and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ad Meher Ali Mondal V. Muhammad Karam Ali Laskar, 17 DLR 365; Muhammad Ewaz V. Birj Lai (ILR 1 All 465) Ajimuddin Pramanik V. Najemuddin Mondal, 17 DLR 231; Azimuddin Bhuiyan V. District Registrar, Dhaka 20 DLR 355; Abdur Rahman V. Baser Ali, 21 DLR 599; Abdur Rahman @ Abdul Rahman V. Maklis Ali, ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Motalib..................…………………...Pre-emptee-Appellant Vs. Iman Ali Mollah and others.....................Pre-emptor-Respondents Judgment March 14, 1990. Result: ...... (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Motalib..................…………………...Pre-emptee-Appellant Vs. Iman Ali Mollah and others.....................Pre-emptor-Respondents Judgment March...... Court and the lower appellate Court correctly decided the issue of limitation. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 123. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 119