Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3721-3740 of 4164 results.
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Sarat Chandra V. Bijoy Chand, AJR 1937 PC 46 atp.47. Kishore Chandra Vs. Ganesh Prasad, Am 1954 SC 316 at p 320; Jagir Kumar vs. Jaswant Singh, AIR 1963 SC 1521. Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Kazi Md. Amirul Islam vs. Bangladesh 16 BLD (AD) 110;Kazi Imamuddin Bhu......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......r Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 January 2006. Cases Referred To......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....was enlisted as enemy property and Abdul Latif Molla who was borgader applied for lease and was granted lease by the Government on 09.07.1970. After the liberation of the country Biraj came back to Bangladesh and filed objection against the lease granted in favour of defendant No.1 but his objec......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Abdul Majid Molla.......................................Petitioner Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others……….........Respondents. Judgment 11 F......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......sion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others.................itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Government of Bangladesh and others................................Petitioners Vs Md. Shahjahan Gazi.................cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- Idris Miah vs. Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyers Involved: Saiful Reza, Advocate......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......mmad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
Messers Chemico Laboratories Ltd. represented by its Chairman of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Internal Resources Division and others.......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......n of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Internal Resources Division and others................Respondents
Judgment
January 23, 2006.
Result:
The petition ......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Develo......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......uhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………........... MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others……&..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....resent: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bang......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad, Seni......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......nt: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Habibur Rahman.........................Appellant. Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., represented by its Managing Director and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismiss......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and ot......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......usain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgme......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....est bidder for Tk. 84,00,000/- (Tk. eighty four lacs) only; that Abdul Khaleque Bain was a citizen of Pakistan and the plaintiff No. 1 has created deeds from Abdul Khaleque Bain by bringing him to Bangladesh; that the terms and conditions of section 8 and 9 (D) of the tender form were not applic......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... No. 95 of 1970 claiming a sum of Rs. 1,35,000/-due on a contract for the construction of Rajshahi Medical College. The suit was pending after liberation and on application filed by the Government of Bangladesh, under Article 3(2) of the Bangladesh (Legal Proceedings) (Special Order), 1972, briefly ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ............................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senio......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....hahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reform......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... ......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. &n...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......so Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... (AD) (1980) 233 ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ...... F. K. M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. The State Acquisition and T......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Wahid Ali and ors Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ined for taking cognizance under Special Powers Act". 3. After hearing the learned Counsel on both sides we find that this case is fully covered by our decision in the case of Seraj Mia Vs. Bangladesh (C. A. 107 of 1977) decided on April 25, 1978. In the Seraj Mia's case it has been held t......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ...... is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ......e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
M/s. Hossain Ahmed Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....were not entitled to any relief by way of interlocutory injunction and as such the order of stay is not sustainable in law, Mr. Ahmed submitted that in the case of Mr. Nurul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh (Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 144 of 1976) this Court had expressed the...... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ......rul Haider Chowdhury J M/s. Hossain Ahmed represented by its proprietor Hossain Ahmed…… ...Appellant Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers represented by its proprietor Md. Delwar Hossain and others. ….. Respondents Judgment November 28, 1979. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (Ac...... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
Nasiruddin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....(Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, CJ Ruhul Islam, J Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J Shahabuddin Ahmed, J Nasiruddin …....Appellant Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors………….Respondent. Judgement April 14, 1980. The Bangladesh Abandoned......t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed, J Nasiruddin …....Appellant Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors………….Respondent. Judgement April 14, 1980. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (President Order No. 16 of 1972) a......t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
13071306130413011299129612951294129312921290128912881284127912761274127212711270