Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3741-3760 of 4376 results.
Shah Alam and ors. Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... doubt. In the result, therefore, I would dismiss this appeal. ORDER OF COURT By a majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 31 ......ported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 31 ....... Moreover evidence of eye-witness have been corroborated by a disinterested witness. So such evidence of eyewitnesses cannot be discarded………………..(47 & 54) Cases Referred to— Nazir Vs. State 14 DLR (SC) 159; Niaz Vs. State 12 DLR (SC) 289; Bhagwan Swarup Vs. State of Maharashtra, ...... doubt. In the result, therefore, I would dismiss this appeal. ORDER OF COURT By a majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 31 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Begum Motia Akhtar Khanam Vs. Shawkat Ara and Others, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....d by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 336 of 1985. 2. Facts are simple:—Plaintiff is the appellant. She filed the suit being Title Suit No. 554 of 1978 in the 1st Court of Munsif, Dhaka against the defendants for ejectment from the suit shop on the ground of being defaulter and...... Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Begum Motia Akhtar Khanam.................................Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. Shawkat Ara and Others...............................Defendant-Respondents Judgement June 11, 1989. Re......ision (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Begum Motia Akhtar Khanam.................................Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. Shawkat Ara and Others...............................Defendant-Respondents Judgement J......hout any order as to cost and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 26. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Arfan Ali alias Arfan Ali Khan and others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....For the Petitioners. Not Represented.-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 117 of 1986. (From the Judgment and order dated 14.7.86 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Criminal Appeal No. 178 of 1984). Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-Accused-petition......AD) (1990) 22 ......ised before the trial Court nor before the appellate Court, nor was it mentioned in the leave petition. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 22 ......ised before the trial Court nor before the appellate Court, nor was it mentioned in the leave petition. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 22 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Sk. A.K.M. Abdul Mannan Vs. M/s. Raj Textile Mills Ltd., 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
............Plaintiff-Respondent. Judgment December 13, 1988. Result: The Rule is discharged. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 104 This case is for transfer of the suit at Dhaka from Jessore on ground of inconvenience. Transfer of a case does not come within the ambit of ......Mills Limited, for recovery of Tk. 5.25 lacs on 24 November 1984. The respondent filed Money Suit No. 7 of 1984 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Jessore, against the petitioner for Tk. 19.62 lacs and odds on 5 December 1984. The petitioner alleged that respondent's suit was filed just to avoid t......er proceedings of the suit filed later in Jessore till disposal of the suit filed earlier in Dhaka. The Rule is discharged. No cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 11. ......er proceedings of the suit filed later in Jessore till disposal of the suit filed earlier in Dhaka. The Rule is discharged. No cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 11. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Ashraf Ali Mondal & Others Vs. State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 1987. Judgment ATM Afzal J.-This appeal by special leave by the four (4) accused-appellants is from order dated 17 June, 1987 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka rejecting summarily their application for bail under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Pro......1, 1987. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), sections 339C & 497 The appellant no. 1 has not been named in the FIR for doing any overt act and also he has not been named in the dying declaration. There is apprehension of delay in starting ......sain be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of trial of Sessions Case No. 6/87. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 08.......sain be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of trial of Sessions Case No. 6/87. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 08...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Aijuddin Matbar Vs. Fagu Matbar & others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....i Matbar are discharged from their bail bonds. Criminal Appeal No.8 of 1977 is disposed of without any separate order passed therein. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 101.......ers Involved: Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Backkar, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.8 of 1977). Abul Kashem, Advocate - For the Respondents No.1-3 and 5-7. B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by S.S. Huda, Advocate-on-R......in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 101.......i Matbar are discharged from their bail bonds. Criminal Appeal No.8 of 1977 is disposed of without any separate order passed therein. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 101...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Bangladesh Vs. Tan Kheng Heck and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....eedings to continue in accordance with law. The accused will continue on the same bail till an order is passed by the competent Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 69. ......rch 29, 1978. Cases Referred To- Emperor Vs. Khawaja Nazir Ahmed, AIR 1945 Privy Council 19; Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. A.T. Mridha, (1974) 26 DLR (SC) 17; Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 38; State of West Bengal Vs. S.N. Basak, AIR 1963 SC 44...... (1979) 69. ......eedings to continue in accordance with law. The accused will continue on the same bail till an order is passed by the competent Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 69. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dhury J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others…………………..... Respondents Ju......J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others…………………..... Respondents Judgment...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, ......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister's Office, Tejgaon, Dhaka & another...............Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed .................................................................................Respondent Judgment August 17, 2006. Case Referred to- AFB Jahan Mia (Md) Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 49 DLR (AD) 122. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Azim Khair, Deputy Attorney Gene......ul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister's Office, Tejgaon, Dhaka & another...............Petitioner Vs. Md. Sultan Ahmed ........................................................Respondent ......s, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 378. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nbsp; Not represented- Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 198 of 2o04. (From the judgment and order dated 21.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1891 of 1998.) ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... of contract and that has been rightly done…………………..(7 & 8) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (SC) 41; M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. vs. M/S. A.R.A.G. Ltd......., Section 73 As the plaintiff’s service was not regulated by any legal instrument or by any statutory provision no declaration or enforcement of contract as to the terms and conditions of service should be given and no such relief has been sought for by the plaintiff. ......laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.................................. Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangabhaban, Dhaka and others ............Respondents. Judgment May 8, 2004. Case Referred.............................. Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Bangabhaban, Dhaka and others ............Respondents. Judgment May 8, 2004. Case Referred to- ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Hare Krishna Das...................................................... Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, President Secretariat, Govt. of t......ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respon......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment February 23, 2003. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Tribunal Case No. 108 of 1999 allowing the same upon setting aside the judgment and order dated 20-11-1997 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka in Tribunal Case No. 228 of 1997 allowing the same. 2. The relevant facts are that th......bsp; Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Badsha Miah (Md)...............Appellant vs Sonali Bank and others.......Respondents Judgment &......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bunal under section 265C of the Code of Criminal Procedure, stating, that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and he was at Bar Council Rest House, Dhaka. The Tribunal rejected the said application and framed charge against the petitioner on 25-2-...... State……………………………..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocat......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......ocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain, QC Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mr. Mvi Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 25th June, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4134 of 200......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ah Manju Huda, Siddique Ali alias Sayeb Ali and Abdur Rahim died in the hospital and Mr Shah AMS Kibria, Advocate Abu Zahir, Abdullah Sardar, Abdul Hossain, Siddique Ali and Feroz Ali were taken to Dhaka for better treatment. In the meantime, Mr Kibria also died. On the basis of the aforesaid fi...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgment ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Result: The appeal is allow...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
19681966196419591957194619431929192519221919191819151914191319121911190919081903